Where your favorite blogs come alive
Three?? Are we not allowed to have permissions??
Okay but seriously, (I think) I know what they meant. But long permission lists AREN'T a bad thing! Most just list basic stuff and guidelines. In fact, having set permissions is helpful...
I judge on how strict it is. If you have a long ass permission list but it's all general 'don't draw hateful stuff', 'you can/can't do gore', 'you're allowed to genderbend' THATS OKAY!!
But if someone is acting like I'm on thin ice for even attempting to draw their oc, I'm iffy....the ice shouldn't be cracking already boo šāāļø calm down
Its all about the context!
I'm gonna be real if your permissions/ requirements list has more than 3 sentences I'm not touching your oc
.
I got bored at work and remembered this reblog, I HAD to sketch it
I canāt stand some Arther Lester designs, not because they arenāt good or the drawings are bad, but because they all look like my debate coach. The other day I saw one and had to do a double take because it was literally just my teacher MY WHOLE ASS TEACHER but with a few scars. I fear this fandom is a prison š¹š¹š¹
Debate is weird. We switch sides everyother round and there is no correct answer. As long as you have better evidence or reasoning, you can win. In my last meet, (it was virtual) the judge for that round had her camera on and I saw a child running around in the background. So, I used most of my last speech leaning heavily on how if the judge chooses the other side's plan of action, our children will die. It worked and I won. The other people on the debate team are now a little bit more scared of me. I don't regret my actions. I hate children.
How I be defending female characters
All these because someone said they don't like Annette Castlevania
internet meme, I don't side with them even with my flaws. I have so many of that, but I do not side for many reasons.
first they always use words "subversion" and "subtelty"
as if personal choice and ignorance are victim card. I am not subverted, it is my fault personally.
It is feminine ideology, "words" "words" kind of argument, ignoring any reasonable cause.
and also , it is made for SUCKERS. for sacrifical sheep (except they're male - tautological joke). how many of these roman citizens were rich and happy? How many, compared to the oligarchs who have ruled the country through fear and hired mercenaries, who was happier? Absolute power. Will not help me white male, only your full humility is what I want. Otherwise, don't talk to me about it.
I've also seen that study. Apparently, Super-spunk would be the equivalent of a shotgun shot and would blow right through the top of Lois's skull! Definitely don't forget something like that anytime soon
Well Iāve been thinking more about it and you know what Iāve come up with?
They both shouldnāt have sex with each other. Like ever.
Hereās my reasoning.
Top!Clark & Bottom!Bruce
Clark could easily break Bruceās pelvis/jaw/any other limb that is being used by simply forgetting to be careful (which is kind of easy when youāre going at it. Even love making has its moments.)
Bruce is impatient and likes things his way. So if he wants Clark to go harder or faster or deeper, Clark doesnāt want to disappoint. But what Clark does may feel different on both ends. Bruce might feel like Clark is going too hard, too fast, and too deep but to Clark thatās what Bruce asked. And so they would be battling back and forth about what they want and need.
If Clark has to be careful during everything he does, I really doubt heās enjoying it like heās suppose to. Imagine wanting to smack dat ass but you donāt get the satisfaction of really hitting it while your partner is complaining you hit too hard even though you didnāt even try?
Again with the different feelings, maybe Clark is going the right speed for Bruce but Clark may be feeling nothing on his side. He has super senses but the feeling heās suppose to get during sex needs to be higher than what he feels on a daily basis. (Ex: Feeling a soft item might feel amazing to someone who doesnāt have Clarkās powers but to Clark itās just that feeling)
If Clark can blow away a building without straining a single vein, who says his spunk aināt gonna do some damage to Bruce if itās still inside him, even with Latex wrapped around?
Top!Bruce & Bottom!Clark
Bruce isnāt as strong or as fast so his 100% may feel like his 25% to Clark. Having super senses doesnāt mean everything is super sensed. It just means you feel things differently. He really needs something to jar him to feel that full effect of sex.
doES HE HAVE A PROSTATE?! WHAT SAYS HE EVEN HAS THE SAME HUMAN MALE REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM AND EROTIC ZONES!??!
Super butt meets Human dick. That shit gonna get broken into two or get squeezed off.
Clarkās sex drive might be far beyond Bruceās. Bruce might not be able to satisfy Clark the way he should without knowing it.
What if Clark is riding Bruce? And Clark slams a little too hard?? And Bruce is in agony over his dick but Clark doesnāt realize it because heās in dick heaven???
Conclusion
They shouldnāt fuck each other but should find other ways of pleasuring each other that doesnāt include penetration.
Hereās some other activities they could do!
Really detailed massages
Oral
Lots and lots of kissing and mouthing
Dirty Talking
Dry humping (Intense cuddling)
Really detailed care (This is more of a kink than anything but I find it hot)
Near by masturbation
These two really shouldnāt fuck. Like ever. Too dangerous and not satisfy.
THATS WHAT IM SAYING ššš
I strongly disagree with this.Ā
Your first argument āThe prisoners in Arkham need somebody like Bolton to keep them in line. Lyle does that, extremely well.ā āThe Prisonersā, the people held within Arkham Asylum are mental patients, they are mentally ill. Harley Quinn has HPD (histrionic personality disorder) and was stuck in an extremely abusive relationship leading to her life of crime, Arnold Wesker has DID (dissociative identity disorder) and doesnāt believe that he committed the crimes but the puppet on his hand. Jonathan Crane has ASPD (as well as other personality disorders), however, in the Btas, it is quite clear he is a very disturbed individual.Ā Ā
Your second argument āJust because he jerked them around a little, doesnāt mean heās some hellian. Also, that kind of treatment improves behavior.ā Perhaps you may have not noticed because the BTAS is a kids show from the 90s but it is heavily implied that Bolton abuses the patients of Arkham, this has been shown in other media in recent years. To suggest that ājerking patients around (ā¦) improves behaviour.ā Is the stupidest thing Iāve ever heard. It doesnāt work in real life, why would it work in Batman? The Batman universe (ignoring all the supernatural stuff, weāre just talking about Batman n Gotham) reflects real life, corruption, mental illness and (yada yada)Ā Ā
Your third statement āI donāt agree with how he was kidnapping pretty random people though, like a news reporter, Commissioner Gordon, etcā¦. If he hadnāt done so he'd be innocent in my eyes.ā Obviously, you watched the show with your eyes closed, Lyle Bolton, was a character supposed to represent a republican extremist. You can tell by his room and by his use of the wording āliberal mediaā. Him kidnapping ārandomā people is him trying to control the city of Gotham to become what he thinks will be better.Ā Ā
Andā¦Commissioner Gordonā¦a random person?? HEāS THE POLICE COMMISSIONER!!!
Fourth statement āI also donāt understand the hate for him. The other Batman villains have done way worse. At least Lyle does something beneficial for Gothams societyā Ā Again, the reason for his hate is because he abuses the patients of Arkham Asylum and other fans of the series actually have empathy. I think the crimes of Lyle Bolton vs The Rogues Gallery can be debated but someone else can do that. The entirety of Gotham Society is corrupted, That's why itās the most crime filled place on earth. yknow what would make it better? An abusive head of security, so he can make the mentally ill patients even more mentally ill, so they can break out and reek havoc on the good people of Gotham.Ā Ā
Fifth statement āI donāt understand why Bruce wouldnāt buy a better security system for Arkham in the first place. Bolton knows what heās doing soooā That's why Bolton got the job in the first place, because of his record but Bruce fired him because he mistreated mentally ill people. Arkham, while also holding mentally ill people holds geniuses, I find it difficult to believe that, letās say The Riddler, a self-proclaimed genius would have a difficult time with a new āhigh techā security in Arkham, the reason it was a wasn't a "revolving door" was because of the abuse. I personally, donāt think the entire problem with Arkham is the security but the doctors, funding, and the system itself.
I strongly disagree with this.Ā
Your first argument āThe prisoners in Arkham need somebody like Bolton to keep them in line. Lyle does that, extremely well.ā āThe Prisonersā, the people held within Arkham Asylum are mental patients, they are mentally ill. Harley Quinn has HPD (histrionic personality disorder) and was stuck in an extremely abusive relationship leading to her life of crime, Arnold Wesker has DID (dissociative identity disorder) and doesnāt believe that he committed the crimes but the puppet on his hand. Jonathan Crane has ASPD (as well as other personality disorders), however, in the Btas, it is quite clear he is a very disturbed individual.Ā Ā
Your second argument āJust because he jerked them around a little, doesnāt mean heās some hellian. Also, that kind of treatment improves behavior.ā Perhaps you may have not noticed because the BTAS is a kids show from the 90s but it is heavily implied that Bolton abuses the patients of Arkham, this has been shown in other media in recent years. To suggest that ājerking patients around (ā¦) improves behaviour.ā Is the stupidest thing Iāve ever heard. It doesnāt work in real life, why would it work in Batman? The Batman universe (ignoring all the supernatural stuff, weāre just talking about Batman n Gotham) reflects real life, corruption, mental illness and (yada yada)Ā Ā
Your third statement āI donāt agree with how he was kidnapping pretty random people though, like a news reporter, Commissioner Gordon, etcā¦. If he hadnāt done so he'd be innocent in my eyes.ā Obviously, you watched the show with your eyes closed, Lyle Bolton, was a character supposed to represent a republican extremist. You can tell by his room and by his use of the wording āliberal mediaā. Him kidnapping ārandomā people is him trying to control the city of Gotham to become what he thinks will be better.Ā Ā
Andā¦Commissioner Gordonā¦a random person?? HEāS THE POLICE COMMISSIONER!!!
Fourth statement āI also donāt understand the hate for him. The other Batman villains have done way worse. At least Lyle does something beneficial for Gothams societyā Ā Again, the reason for his hate is because he abuses the patients of Arkham Asylum and other fans of the series actually have empathy. I think the crimes of Lyle Bolton vs The Rogues Gallery can be debated but someone else can do that. The entirety of Gotham Society is corrupted, That's why itās the most crime filled place on earth. yknow what would make it better? An abusive head of security, so he can make the mentally ill patients even more mentally ill, so they can break out and reek havoc on the good people of Gotham.Ā Ā
Fifth statement āI donāt understand why Bruce wouldnāt buy a better security system for Arkham in the first place. Bolton knows what heās doing soooā That's why Bolton got the job in the first place, because of his record but Bruce fired him because he mistreated mentally ill people. Arkham, while also holding mentally ill people holds geniuses, I find it difficult to believe that, letās say The Riddler, a self-proclaimed genius would have a difficult time with a new āhigh techā security in Arkham, the reason it was a wasn't a "revolving door" was because of the abuse. I personally, donāt think the entire problem with Arkham is the security but the doctors, funding, and the system itself.
IMPORTANT QUESTION FOR ANYONE WHO SEES THIS ā¼ļø Can you theoretically, simultaneously whip and nae nae? Me and my friends have been having a heated 2 HOUR DISCUSSION on this topic, bringing in science and math. So please say youāre intricate thoughts!!
@m0ldybreadd
@thedeanguy-exe
When I don't agree with someone's take on something but I shut my mouth instead of arguing because I don't like conflict that invovles me and I'm not good with getting my points across in an arguement.