153 posts
Am a stag not a cuck
I devised a test for cuckolds based on my ex boyfriend’s profile. Would love to hear about other indicators if I missed any. Take the test if you dare.
1. Do you view more than an hour of porn everyday?
2. Do you seek out cuckold/cheating porn more than any other category?
3. Do you fantasize about other guys fucking your girl?
4. Are you much more likely to cum while jerking off if the subject of the porn is cheating or cuckolding?
5. Do you buy your girlfriend sexy clothes to wear out in public whether you are with her or not?
6. Do you fantasize about another guy fucking your girl during sex?
7. During sex do you try to get her to talk about past boyfriends or ask her what she thinks about current men either your friends, neighbors, or celebrities?
8. Are you insecure about your cock size?
9. Do you look through her phone or computer secretly hoping to find her being naughty with another guy?
10. Finally, do you want to watch her rub, tug, and suck a bigger cock than yours?
If you answered yes to 5 or more of these questions you are definitely a cuck!
Gorgeous
VW bus
If he apologized...it might count
Sure...if they stop killing israelies.
Downloadable poster
11x17 (8.5x11 available on demand)
FREE AHED TAMIMI
FREE PALESTINE
FREE POLITICAL PRISONERS
56 de soto
Traitor
Jane Fonda applies lipstick using a handheld mirror on the set of director Peter Tewksbury’s film, ‘Sunday in New York,’ New York City. Fonda is sitting on a bench next to a makeup case [1963].
No but I'd love to
Wtf
Cadillac Series 62 Coupe (1953) at Viva Las Vegas (als272)
That was before he took office. As they say, the job makes the man.
Another one of Trump’s tweets that didn’t age well
me: *sees a fat cat*
me, in tears: you are so fucking big i love you…
Traitor
Jane Fonda
Traitor
Jane Fonda
She is just gorgeous
Marilu Henner
Start by learning how to spell
How can I turn my conservative girlfriend into a sult? You konw, I want her accept that she is a sult and not force her.
By having a conversation about it.
#sack up and tell her
So...beghazi didn't work, Russia didn't work, stormy didn't work, so now it's kids of illegal aliens. Pitiful. This assures a red sweep in next election.
The Trump administration border crackdown that has separated thousands of children from their parents is built on a mountain of small-time criminal prosecutions that typically end with people sentenced to spend no additional time in jail and pay a $10 fee, according to a USA TODAY analysis of thousands of cases.
The “zero tolerance” push along the U.S. border with Mexico was meant to deter migrants by bringing criminal charges against everyone caught entering the United States illegally. In addition, it served as the legal machinery for splitting children from parents who were accompanying them across the border. Since the crackdown began in May, border agents have separated about 2,300 children from their families.
The administration gave little sign that it would ease that stance Thursday despite an international backlash so intense that even some of the president’s allies had threatened to break with the White House. The Justice Department said there would be “no change” in its enforcement push, and Trump insisted the government must to maintain “a very tough policy” along the border.
The crackdown has produced a high-velocity assembly line of prosecutions that has sped thousands of migrants through crowded federal courtrooms to answer for the misdemeanor of having entered the United States illegally
An examination of thousands of pages of federal court records show that those cases are seldom more than a symbolic undertaking. In many cases, migrants are taken from an immigration holding facility, bused to federal court, quickly plead guilty to having entered the country illegally, and are sentenced to whatever time they have already spent in the government’s custody and a $10 court fee. Then they’re returned to immigration authorities to be processed for deportation.
USA TODAY examined 2,598 written judgments in border-crossing cases filed in federal courts along the border since mid-May. In nearly 70 percent of those cases, migrants pleaded guilty and immediately received a sentence of time served, meaning they would spend no additional time in jail. Another 13 percent were sentenced to unsupervised probation, including a condition that they not illegally re-enter the United States. In both cases, that meant they would immediately be returned to immigration officials to be processed for deportation, leaving them in essentially the same position as if they had not been prosecuted.
Still, Meyers and other defense lawyers said that by the time some of their clients returned to the immigration facilities where they had been held, their children were gone.
So far, there’s no sign that the separated families that were put in the system before Trump pumped the brakes have been grandfathered into the new “keep them together” executive order. Those kids are still stuck, and there’s a possibility that some of them may never be reunited. All over an infraction that only warrants a fine and an absolute maximum of six months in prison.
That is a coyote not a fox
Being detained is a lot different than being killed
Popular opinion: you can’t be vegan/pro-life and claim you care about human life when undocumented immigrant labor exploitation is a nonissue for you.
Who said it was a non-issue?
Writer has bad case of TDS
[Conservative commentator Matt] Schlapp said the Trump administration’s policy of separating families is “the same way Barack Obama did it.”
Obama’s immigration policy specifically sought to avoid breaking up families. While some children were separated from their parents under Obama, this was relatively rare, and occurred at a far lower rate than under Trump, where the practice flows from a zero tolerance approach to illegal border-crossings.
We rate this False.
That’s not to say Obama didn’t have bad immigration policies. He just didn’t have fucking baby jails.
See also: NBC News digs a little bit deeper into why people like Schlapp are wrong, wrong, wrong.
Indeed I will
False concept. Income is not a right. Therefore it cannot be disparate.
Define open
Delicious
In her transparent bikini and showing her boobs and pussy
Clearly the photoshoppers have sad cases of TDS
So apparently a couple of photoshop artists are similarly inspired by this photo.
A thing of beauty
I like the fat fendered Fords a lot, and this ‘53 certainly is a doozy. And he says that the flathead V8 in it has never been touched by a wrench, but runs like a sewing machine!
False based ideology.
Bs