Ashurbanipal: The Coming King – Part II (1987)

Nefertum, god of the lotus and son of Ptah and Sekhmet.

podbean.com

36: Eridu at the dawn of time: interview with Karrar Sabah

I interviewed Karrar Sabah Al Ramahi, PhD student at Baghdad University, about his research on the city of Eridu! Furqan Salam helped with t

interview episode!

Painted clay figure of an equestrienne, ca 7th-9th century AD. Excavated from Tomb No.187, Astana Turfan, Xinjiang

Spiritual Potency, the Loss & the Recovery thereof: from Adapa (Adam) to Gilgamesh to the End Times

How God created Man and men in Sumer, Akkad and Egypt fashioned the mankind by creating gods

Emperor Ashurnasirpal II (883-859 BCE) appears twice, dressed in ritual robes and holding the mace symbolizing authority; he makes a gesture of worship to Ashur depicted in a winged disc. In front of him there is the Sacred Tree of Life. Excavated by: Sir Austen Henry Layard (May 1846) in the North West Palace of Kalhu (today's Nimrud), North Iraq (then Ottoman Empire)

The present text is not a concise essay; it does not therefore cover all the topics related to the series of historical developments herein mentioned. Being part of a long exchange of emails with a friend, it merely offers readers the chance to become better acquainted with historic events that are mentioned in almost all sacred texts but comprehended poorly and confusingly. A constant but truly disastrous human mistake is the projection of assumptions, conventional thoughts, and situations from our environment onto past circumstances that were however very different. In this regard, the present text will be very helpful as it will instigate the conscious reader into active reconsidering and systematic reassessing several hitherto unquestioned conclusions that are certainly wrong.

Contents

Introduction

I. Ra, Isis and Kabbalah

II. Messiah-Christ-Mahdi: a pre-Biblical, eschatological concept

III. The Tree of Life, its loss, and its eschatological recovery

IV. Two kinds of priesthood for the descendants of Noah and a separate, third, priesthood for the incestuous remnants of sinful descendants of Adam

V. Creation, spirituality, the loss thereof (as consequence of successive falls), and its eschatological recovery

VI. Spirituality from the Flood to the Late Antiquity

VII. Spirituality, the five elements, and the wrong sources of modern Western mystics

Introduction

Many people today confuse the human soul with the mind, the heart, and the solar plexus that are the pillars on which the human character is founded, built, gradually developed and ultimately formed; that is wrong. The human character is definitely not the human soul. Only few days after the death, the body and the character start getting disintegrated, whereas the soul is immortal. As part of the spiritual universe, the human soul is a particular spiritual entity, which is ascribed to a nascent body (embryo) at the very moment of its birth.

Due to conscious (and at times unconscious) synergy between the soul and the body, a human can perform 'miracles'. All those 'miracles', like every similar act that was performed by Jesus and described in Gospels, were not truly speaking miracles but the result of spiritual potency, i.e. spiritual-material (bodily) synergy. 

In fact, the narratives are true, but miracles do not exist. Simply, humans have been first fooled about the spiritual universe, which is also inside each being, because we all have souls and everything created within the material universe corresponds to its spiritual hypostasis (or soul); and at a second (and worst) level, humans have been deceived and dissociated from their souls, which in turn results in lack of spiritual potency and in the subsequent formation of the belief in 'miracles'. I will now offer few practical examples of spiritual potency, so that no one has any doubt about my approach to the topic:

A man with spiritual potency is able not to allow a bullet shot at him to penetrate his body and kill him. Back in the 1930s, it was reported that the great Hindu sage and mystic Mahatma Gandhi used to just watch English military airplanes (targeting the people of a city that had revolted against the English rule) and make it sure that the bombs dropped fell elsewhere without killing anyone.

A man with spiritual potency is able to physically walk on the sea or lake water or in the air, to be corporeally present somewhere without being seen by those who are present there, to instantly transfer himself bodily to a remote location, to literarily walk nearby wild beasts without being attacked or threatened by them, as well as to naturally stay in the depths of the oceans and deep inside the Earth without any difficulty, consequence or side-effect.

Furthermore, a man with spiritual potency is able to hide objects or physically transfer them to remote locations, make them speak, and instantly change their shape, to interact (or 'speak') with many spiritual beings, souls, spirits, intelligences and hierarchies, to bodily move back in time and invisibly attend a well-known or an unknown historical scene (meeting, conference, battle, liturgy or other event); and so on.   

--------------------- Response to a friend -------------------------

My dear friend,

Thank you for the attachments, your continuous interest, your comprehensive response, and the critical points of discussion that you raise!   

Recently, I wrote extensive letters to you because I wanted you to have an accurate understanding of my encounter with the spiritual universe, and of my explorations, ruminations and polarizations in view of a methodically ameliorated comprehension of the interaction between the spiritual and the material halves of all humans. For me, it is this interaction that generated History. That's why I don't believe that what people call "History" has been only the outcome of material components and constituents. I therefore try to always highlight the spiritual dimensions of the developments that took place on Earth. Consequently, it is only normal that with great joy I read your sentence "As I see you have already the basis for spiritual science, it would be a pleasure for me to give you a few hints".  

I. Ra, Isis and Kabbalah

Speaking about Kabbalah, you refer to the "the magic of the word"; to me, this fact became first understood through Ancient Egyptian sacred texts as per which Isis is the only to know the true name of Ra. I interpret this narrative as revelatory that only the spiritual ancestors of the Ancient Freemasons and Rosicrucians (i.e. Isis) had this knowledge, whereas the spiritual ancestors of the Jesuits (Nephthys) did not. I understand the beginning of the Gospel by John; in fact, it is a Gnostic text. From this point to the Jesuit-promoted concept, heretic Russian Orthodox dogma, and Catholic infiltration attempt of Imiaslavie (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imiaslavie) the distance is small.

All the same, it is my conviction that, by using the term 'word" for the description of Kabbalah-related exercises and endeavors, people only get confused. I believe that the truly correct term should be "sound"; this is the correct meaning of all formulas collected and analyzed by Franz Bardon. Their spiritual value is effective when they are uttered / pronounced; not when they are merely evoked in the mind of a person!

And yes! I fully agree with what you say "The book by Franz Bardon about the Kabbalah is the only one on our globe teaching the spiritual practice of this science.".

II. Messiah-Christ-Mahdi: a pre-Biblical, eschatological concept

Following my historical researches on Jesus, which were spearheaded by my studies of Robert Ambelain's books, I realized that Jesus was not the Messiah or Christ whom the Ancient Hebrews were said to expect to come at the End of Time. But when I studied Assyriology and Egyptology, I realized (as early as 1980) that the Biblical and later the Christian and then Islamic concepts of Messiah-Christ-Mahdi are nothing more than adaptations and localizations of the Ancient Assyrian-Babylonian monotheistic concepts of Ninurta and Etana (two parallel perceptions of the concept of a Savior coming at the end of Times), and of the (equally monotheistic) Ancient Egyptian concept of Horus. Furthermore, several episodes of the Anatolian Hittite eschatological myth and sacred text 'Ullikummi' have been passed onto the Christian Book of the Revelation, whereas the Hittite Messiah Tasmisu managed to save the central city of the End Time days at the last moment, finally vanquishing Ullikummi, the monster that came out of the Sea (: the Antichrist).

That this approach to the Ancient Oriental civilizations is embarrassing to all, namely the Zionists, the Freemasons and the Jesuits, I can understand easily. The traditional method of academic interpretation renders all these eschatological texts mere myths that no specialist truly attempts to systematically interpret and analyze.

This situation was a constant parameter and a question that I repeatedly made to myself during my postgraduate and doctoral studies:

- Why do Biblical theologians, who study a Biblical text during the seminar (first discussing issues pertaining to the script, the language-lexicography, the grammar and the syntax), offer also a historico-religious interpretation of the text under study (of let's say Isaiah 53), whereas Orientalists teaching the Descent of Ishtar to the Nether world limit their courses only to the first section of analysis? 

In any case, the fact that Jesus was not the Messiah-Christ is also confirmed by a simple fact: there cannot be a Messiah (or Savior) without the End of Time; and apparently, the time of the Roman Emperor Tiberius was not the End of Time – which means that no Messiah appeared then.

III. The Tree of Life, its loss, and its eschatological recovery

I can perhaps accept your statement ("In Kabbalah the hierarchy is called 'Tree of Life'.") but only as a metaphor. It is my absolute conviction that the Tree of Life is a real, material and spiritual, Tree, which was at the epicenter of the original Paradise. By preferring the Tree of Knowledge to the Tree of Life, Adapa (Adam in Hebrew) only condemned his posterity to 'fall'. By so doing, he provoked a series of other falls, which will be outmaneuvered and canceled only at the End of Time, following many unprecedented destructions and ruinations. Actually, this is the nucleus of every known eschatological concept and soteriological dogma from the times of the Sumerians, the Akkadians-Assyrians-Babylonians, the Egyptians and the Hittites down to our days. Further 'falls' occurred to Mankind, more paragraphs were added to the apocalyptic myths and the soteriological texts.

Many people understand that "as above so below", but few people realize that "as before so after". There is no such thing as "doomsday"; it is not an independent event or a terminal development; those who believe such nonsense are either fools or liars. A rather early phase of the End Times may eventually be described as "doomsday", but this is only the gate to the original Paradise re-established. That is why Fathers of the Christian Church and Christian theologians (thinking that he was the Messiah) named Jesus "New (or Last) Adam" (1 Corinthians 15:45-58). The final Savior will be as spiritually powerful as Adam before the original sin (which caused the fall).

Every well-founded spiritual quest is therefore the search for the Tree of Life; I surely understand very well why so many mystics in so many, different, socio-cultural environments were so obstinately determined not to allow thoughts in their minds. This is a paramount effort of self-purification. Thoughts are useless forms of self-destruction. Adam, before his sin, did not 'think'; he did not need to. Angels do not think; souls, spirits, spiritual intelligences, and other hierarchies of the non-material universe do not think. Will (voluntas) is unrelated to thinking.

Cogito ergo non sum: this truth demonstrates the rotten foundations of the Western world. And you, my dear friend, as a consistent and experienced mystic, certainly know very well that Siegfried's death in Götterdämmerung is only the result of 'thinking' (and betrayal). But this was  already very well known to the Ancient Mesopotamians, who used to identify 'thinking' as a parameter of the perilous domain of Enlil (: Air) and, to avert all troubles, recognized 'wisdom' as possible without thinking and as a dimension of the realm of Ea (: Soft Waters).

And by eliminating all thoughts and evacuating their subconscious, the Assyrian emperors and high priests were able to bring the Tree of Life back to Nineveh. They even were spiritually conscious and empowered to stipulate that the Tree of Life was one and three at the same time, as it was reflected at the center of the City of the Nether World and at the Gates of the Firmament.

I believe that real spiritual potency combined with transcendental moral (which is inherent to all created beings) enables humans to rise to the level of sanctity; then, the materialization (: the material appearance) of the 'Sole Tree' (: Tree of Life) in a spot, which is part of the -secret and unknown to most- holy land, can take place. But this is not up to anyone. When it happens, it will have worldwide impact and it will bring forth incalculable changes, totally changing everything in the everyday life of all the people. This is what happened in Nineveh in the 9th-8th c. BCE and for this development to be completed Prophet Jonah was dispatched there, having the absolute success that he had and contributing to the subsequent events, which irrevocably linked Assyria to the End Times. For this reason Jesus and the Quran referred to the Men of Nineveh as returning at the End Times, and to the conclusive role that they will play in rejecting and terminating "this generation" (: the prevailing system before the eschatological termin).

IV. Two kinds of priesthood for the descendants of Noah and a separate, third, priesthood for the incestuous remnants of sinful descendants of Adam

I am glad to know that you agree with the concept of the "two kinds of priesthood" which is a constituent element of my approach to World History and a constant point of reference in many of my articles. Identifying the "good ones" with Isis (namely the spiritual ancestors of pre-modern Freemasonry) and the "evil ones" with Nephthys (i.e. the predecessors of the modern Jesuits), I exclude Zionism from both.

Actually, I don’t believe that Zionism has anything to do with historical Judaism and the descendants of the Hasmonean Jews. In fact, Zionists hijacked Judaism, stripping (Sephardic, Romaniote, Mizrahi and Yemenite) Jews of all of their Biblical and eschatological visions and expectations, and making them theirs. Actually, Zionism is the filthy product of a bastard population which does not originate from Noah but from Adam, but has been contaminated with the seed of one generation of Giants.

Early known as the (antediluvian) Guti, they infiltrated among the early Turanian Kassites whom they helped (after the Hittite sack of Babylon - 1596 BCE) by means of treachery and black magic to invade Babylon and establish a counterfeit and devilish dynasty in Mesopotamia. After Elam overthrew the Kassites and the Assyrians invaded and annexed Babylon, the Kassites formed a powerful polytheistic and idolatrous clique of priests who fueled anti-Assyrian paroxysm and survived all Assyrian invasions.

They induced Nebuchadnezzar to invade the tiny, marginal and unimportant Judah enclave in order to deliberately transport the totality of the Jewish population to Babylonia and thus expose them to efficient Kassite Zionist infiltration. By nominally accepting 7th c. BCE Judaism as religion and by arranging intermarriages, the Kassite Zionists (later known as Gog and Magog and more recently identified as Khazars) intended to substitute themselves to the Jews, rewrite and readjust the Bible at will, thus removing and adding paragraphs and sentences; they were the moving force behind the composition of Talmud to which not one pre-Exilic layman, priest, king or prophet would have ever ascribed himself.

V. Creation, spirituality, the loss thereof (as consequence of successive falls), and its eschatological recovery

Yes, I accept everything that you say in your paragraph about Christian Rosenkreuz and the earlier stages of spiritual initiation, but I find it very brief as diagram and very modest as description particularly if we take it into account, when exploring the spiritual potency which existed as inherent to all humans but later vanished from among the average people. That is why I intend now to present to you for the first time my complete perception and interpretation of the topic, namely the presence or absence of spiritual potency among humans and the true destination of Life and Creation. This is going to be the main part of my present response.    

The present average human was not created by God; his condition is the result of many, successive falls, which correspond to different sins (in terms of thoughts, sentiments, desires, words and deeds) that contravened the Divine Order of Creation which is inherent to any being and which is called 'Moral' within religious context. So, to be accurate, today's man is the product of the consequences of earlier generations that go back to Adapa (Adam), the early Man whom God created.

And while all parts of the Creation have their spiritual counterparts (and this renders the division of the modern discipline of Chemistry into Organic and Inorganic a vicious and deliberate trickery), Adam was an outstanding marvel as he was able to perform hitherto unfathomable 'miracles', which are not at all extraordinary or unbelievable (as today's fallen, trivial, miserable, idiotic and pathetic humans think), but simply ordinary, regular deeds that may be absolutely necessary for the purpose of the Creation.

Naming animals, reptiles and birds (but not the fish) is an activity reported as part of the Creation, because by designating the name of these creatures, in fact Adam attributed to them their functions and traits as if he had been in a way their creator.

However, a considerable part of this spiritual potency was lost due to the early sin, which clearly involved thought, calculation, interest, and exposure to desire and lust. This is not only a simple matter of narrative, but also a clear indication of how the inherent (to all beings) code of the Creation functions. It is not God who punishes, but man who, by indulging himself into what he was not created for, gets exposed to the consequences of his 'impermissible' thoughts, sentiments, desires, words and deeds.

In fact, there is nothing 'impermissible' to humans, because Man was created free, but for everything there is an inevitable consequence. What the story of Adam and Eve reveals is that sex is evil, and therefore human reproduction as per the Order of the Creation was absolutely unrelated to the sexual intercourse, as this act has been viewed in the Late Antiquity and during the Christian, Islamic and Modern times.

All the same, the pictorial representation of the Ancient Egyptian concepts of fertility and reproduction lets us understand that the body members, which are used for reproduction, are the same, but their original functionality differed greatly from the paradisiac times to the post-paradisiac epochs. In this regard, it is essential to state that the act of reproduction was void of lust, because it was performed in total synergy between soul and body.

For this reason, according to the Ancient Egyptian Iwnw Heliopolitan dogma, when after the dismemberment of Osiris by Seth, Isis recollected the parts of the Human Well Being (: this is the real meaning of the Ancient Egypt name 'Wser', which was later distorted to 'Osiris' in Ancient Greek and Latin), she made a replica for the lost male part, which was "tossed into the river, and the lepidotus, the sea-bream, and the pike had fed upon it" (Plutarch's Moralia, De Iside et Osiride 18). Isis consecrated the phallus, but it is explicitly said that the phallus is only a simulacrum of the original male member.

The first fall must have had an enormous impact notably on the fauna; it would be absurd to think that God created wild animals. Simply, the successive falls of the Man affected them greatly; there are plenty of Biblical passages and eschatological literature as per which the original condition will be reestablished after the End Times (example: "The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the young goat, and the calf and the lion and the fattened calf together; and a little child shall lead them"; Isaiah 11, 6).

In spite of the loss of spiritual potency, the original humans were still extraordinarily formidable and dreadful to all animals; the evolutionist scheme as per which the early humanoids had to permanently fight hard for their survival is sheer nonsense and utter aberration. In fact, various absurd theories, inconsistent assumptions, and scientific frauds, such as Darwinism, Marxism-Leninism (historical materialism), evolutionism and several other absolutely preposterous philosophical systems were treacherously adopted by academic circles thus conditioning the direct and pertinent understanding of ancient sacred texts, other historical sources, and the archaeological record.

Despite the loss of spiritual potency, the early humans were still omnipotent beings that could carry out prodigious exploits and magnificent works; this was due to the fact that they were still able to master their own electromagnetic fluids far better than the Latvian-American mystic and scientist Edward Leedskalnin (1887-1951), who first quarried and sculpted, and then transported to another location (Homestead, Florida) more than 1100 short tons of limestone (1 short ton is 907 kg) completely alone with the use of modest tools and the help of a truck driver. Explaining how he was doing the monumental structure, he called upon the skills and the capacities of the early pyramid architects and builders.

Many people admire Leedskalnin's exploits, but unfortunately, few people manage to notice (let alone assess and evaluate) key points of his life example; even fewer are capable of making the equation. Abstinence and celibacy (or chastity), rigorousness and austerity were evident to all who met him. But this means exactly what I already stated for the original Man; he was apparently created to steer clear of thought, calculation, interest, desire and lust. And this is exactly what the life examples of the prophets, as well as the behavioral standards left by selected emperors, high priests, and mystics, demonstrate. 

Consequently, it is safe to claim the following:

1- Lust triggered the fall, which brought about a significant loss of spiritual potency;

2- Loss of spiritual potency caused further lust and other sins (thus starting a vicious circle); and

3- Spiritual potency recovery is impossible without elimination of lust and other sins.

As a matter of fact, numerous conspiracy theories, earlier unheard fallacies, such as the assumption about the existence of the so-called 'Extraterrestrials', and many other fraudulent postulations started being propagated in the late 19th c.: this was due to the fact that people have been gradually approaching to the End Times, when the most complicated lies and the most absurd delusions will be propagated. These monstrously devilish attempts occurred because of the determination of the evil priesthoods, which rule today's world, to permanently keep all the humans captive of deceptions, which prevent them from liberating themselves from the compact falsehood in which they have been living.

For these counterfeit and blasphemous religious leaders, it is definitely essential to prevent humans from attempting to reestablish synergy of the body and the soul in themselves. So, you understand that almost all those, who speak today against the so-called New World Order and the established academic disciplines, are integral parts of the evil system, as long as they do not admonish all the humans to focus on abstinence, celibacy, and departure (lit. exodus) from today's Western societies, as well as to deploy an overwhelming effort in order to achieve spiritual consciousness. Deception, delusion and lie were the first acts of this demoniacal priesthood, and the same nature will characterize their last acts, when they will perish in the years of upheaval during the End Times.

All the same, in spite of the existence of masterful paragons of faith like Enoch (Idris), the original fall generated conditions of life in which humans started being prone to further sins. The quintessence of those transgressions were due to the slow formation of what people now call "ego", which grows fed on thoughts, calculations, interests, sentiments, and desires, thus dragging the spiritual-material individual far from the purpose of the Creation and the inherent code of the Creation. This nefarious situation proved to be extremely useful to some evil people.

It is in Mesopotamia around the middle of the 4th millennium BCE, when we first notice that within the same early urban center some edifices start becoming larger than the rest. There are only two per agglomeration: the palace and the temple. This rivalry, as it is documented first due to archaeological data and second thanks to the early historical sources (3250-2750 BCE), bears witness to the first tensions within the then united priesthood, enabling us to correctly interpret the rise of the polytheism as an heresy and an effort to personalize, depict and humanize the Divine.

In striking opposition to the early kings and the monotheistic priesthoods that were associated to them, the devious clergy, which supported the primary sacerdotal forerunners, intended to enslave the local population and by means of falsehood to render them dependent on intermediaries between the so-called 'gods' and the humans. This was the foremost postulation of the wicked priesthood: the humans alone cannot contact God. It goes without saying that this aberration is direct rejection of the Creation.  

The malicious attempt of subordination and enslavement of the early humans to some supposedly necessary 'priests' is called 'religion'; it killed spirituality, limiting the humans to merely material functions and therefore bestializing them. The evil, absurd, and inhuman claim that Man necessitates an intermediary between him and God is the epitome of Satanism. From the deeds of those days to the final split of the early sacerdotal college in Sumer, several hundreds of years passed. Insane attempts and numerous trials of promiscuous intermarriages took place back at those days, and they left an impact on the local societies, as they were repeatedly mentioned in posterior historical sources; for example, the Assyrians, considering themselves as the only true humans (in Mesopotamia), namely the descendants of the Sumerians and the Akkadians, irrevocably denounced several unclean races, notably the Guti, the Elamites, and the Kassites, as abnormal and inhuman.

It was only normal that these calamitous developments totally dissociated humans from their souls and caused further detrimental loss of spiritual potency. The evil priesthood -of which the terminal continuity is represented today by Vatican and the Jesuits- wanted to also destroy the link between men and animals, which goes back to Adam. That is why they forced the fallen humans of the antediluvian world to kill animals in order to hypothetically obtain spiritual power by taking possession of their souls. This was a lie; it could never happen and it never happened. But due to this delusion, an unnecessary, yet enormous, bloodshed took place, plunging the disoriented and victimized human into grave immorality, polytheistic superstitions, exorbitant delusions, abject materialism, black magic (representation of animals that had to be sacrificed), and utter misery.

VI. Spirituality from the Flood to the Late Antiquity

The divine punishment and the dissolution of the early society were narrated in several sacred texts as the Flood; erroneous readings, naïve considerations, and superficial approaches to Assyrian-Babylonian and other, posterior, historical sources and divine literature led to tremendous misjudgment and protracted confusion as regards this disproportionate event and phenomenal circumstance, which left an irrevocable stamp on the History of Mankind. Actually, it is not for nothing that Jesus established a parallel between the days of Ut Napishtim (Noah / Nuh) and those of the End Times.

Gullible researchers and foolish scholars, who still accept the narrative, think that the Flood was due to intense and overwhelming rain; that's hilarious! Even if all the lands and seas, continents and oceans are covered by clouds and if it rains all over the surface of the Earth, it will be practically impossible for the level of water to rise by 200 or 300 m, let alone thousands of meters as various sacred texts stipulate.

The deliberate disregard for, if not concealment of, the Biblical text (Genesis 7, 11) only contributes to the cosmological and geological bewilderment of mankind; but the text is very accurate: "on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened" (Septuagint: τῇ ἡμέρᾳ ταύτῃ ἐῤῥάγησαν πᾶσαι αἱ πηγαὶ τῆς ἀβύσσου, καὶ οἱ καταῤῥάκται τοῦ οὐρανοῦ ἠνεῴχθησαν; Vulgata: rupti sunt omnes fontes abyssi magnae et cataractae caeli apertae sunt; Masoretic text: בַּיּ֣וֹם הַזֶּ֗ה נִבְקְעוּ֙ כׇּֽל־מַעְיְנֹת֙ תְּה֣וֹם רַבָּ֔ה וַאֲרֻבֹּ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם נִפְתָּֽחוּ׃). In fact, it was a stern and formidable development, which involved unprecedented fractures of the Earth's crust and the break (: opening) of the Firmament.

Many people fail to notice that the descriptions attested in sacred texts about the antediluvian world present a natural environment totally different from the one that we see today; even worse, they fail to understand that this contrast is actually true and that the Earth that God created was also very distinct in shape and contents from what surrounds us now. In other words, it is completely wrong to imagine or believe that God created deserts, steppes, savannahs, and swamps, and that the seas (salt waters) occupied a so vast surface as in the postdiluvian world. There too, the perfect world after the End Times, a topic that is the object of several soteriological narratives, presents considerable analogies with the original antediluvian environment, which is what God created.

In Ancient Mesopotamia, which is the cradle of World History, we find

a- 'prophetic' or 'apocalyptic' texts about the Flood (which were written before the event),

b- historical texts about the Flood (which were written after the event but detailed the downward spiral of circumstances that had occurred in the antediluvian society of Akkad, leading it to ultimate collapse and decomposition), and

c- mythological texts about the Flood (which were written later for spiritual, religious and educational purposes, therefore involving symbols, analogies, specific terms, and codified descriptions that became the foundations of the transcendental comprehension of the facts by later generations).

Although the cosmological-geological changes were unprecedented, the spiritual, socio-cultural, religious, and imperial transformations were apparently even more overwhelming. The polytheistic priesthood prevailed almost worldwide, forcing therefore the true believers (: the monotheistic sacerdotal colleges) to be organized in defensive mode in order to avoid infiltration. This is how what we call now 'societies of initiation' or 'spiritual orders' came to existence. It was apparently detrimental for the entire mankind, because due to this situation, spirituality depended almost exclusively on participation in some priesthood.

Societies, nations or countries with hierarchical priesthoods and spiritual orders are abnormal, inhuman, and impossible to maintain; that is why the present world order is inevitably perishable. There cannot be any hierarchy among humans, involving the absurd withholding of information, knowledge, wisdom, and spiritual potency. This is so, because if this condition had been tolerable, God would have not created one but many Adams – one per hierarchy level.

There cannot be secrecy among humans and there cannot be secluded groups with interests common only to them within a society; this is so because such conditions of life breach the divine commandment of fraternity. The structure of the postdiluvian world is therefore unsustainable, because it is morally indefensible. The only means that prevented its total collapse was the war; the conditions of sin, injustice and inequality -in and by themselves- bring forth the end. This is so because dissociation from one person's soul and formation of egoistic, egocentric and egotistic characters cause confusion, misjudgment, failure and putrefaction.

In the postdiluvian world, people could not reestablish spiritual-material synergy except by becoming members of a priestly college. Within such an environment, the incessant clash between the polytheistic and the monotheistic priesthoods took the form of invariably composing and decomposing myths, epics, and transcendental narratives, attributing different traits to the same god (thus disfiguring God), and elaborating dissimilar variants and opposite versions of sacred texts. There has never been a religion with an unaltered holy book.

Physically strong and spiritually dwarf, Gilgamesh was an anti-Akkadian king or, if you prefer, a counterfeit Sargon whom the polytheistic and idolatrous priesthood of the Neo-Sumerian times fashioned in order to divulge, and ensure the prevalence of, the concept of Papo-Caesarism. Projecting his past at will, they made of their creature a foremost king, a legendary hero, and a divine human with a material perspective and an anti-universal worldview.

Justifying the increasing urbanism of late 3rd millennium BCE Mesopotamia and the subsequent disconnection from nature, Gilgamesh became the object of many sacred texts and narratives which promoted the counterfeit and idolatrous notion of a city being the microcosm of the universe. Consequently, the original literature about Gilgamesh facilitated evil spiritual policies of the type 'urbi et orbi'. That is why in striking contrast to the genuine Akkadian imperial universalism (or ecumenism) of Sargon of Akkad, the religious-educational cycle of Gilgamesh attempted to foster an 'internationalism' based on the interconnection of urban centers, solid disrespect for the nature, deliberate promotion of ethnic amalgamation and acculturation, and lack of any temporal dimension.  

Quite contrarily, the Akkadian (and later the Assyrian) imperial universalism was founded on the sanctity of various locations (geographical determinism), exemplary respect for the nature viewed as remnant of the original Paradise, singularity of the Chosen People, namely the Akkadians-Assyrians, uniqueness of the Emperor (King of the Universe / Caesaropapism) as the permanent embodiment of the Messiah (Ninurta or Etana: two monotheistic cycles of religious-eschatological Mesopotamian literature), adoration of God in front of the Tree of Life, and endless exaltation of the Sacred Moment (as identification element on the axis of Being and Becoming).

The interminable friendliness and rivalry between Gilgamesh and Enkidu, as an odd spiritual-literary pattern, reveals the morbidity of Gilgamesh as prototype; in fact, all the Biblical and Islamic prophets followed the example of Enkidu, the paramount non-urban human. The wretchedness of the evil model of Gilgamesh can be best understood when specifying that the Mesopotamian hero-king is none other than the Biblical-Islamic Nimrud (also spelled as Nimrod & Namrud), who forced Abram-Abraham-Ibrahim to exile.

But, when we comprehensively examine all the related literary excerpts, we are certainly able to conclude that no utterance surpasses the detrimental rejection of Gilgamesh by the real vanquisher of the Flood Atrahasis (Ut Napishtim/Noah-Nuh), who lived eternally in Dilmun, having preserved around him the likeness of the antediluvian world; the fact that Gilgamesh would never attain immortality heralded the inevitable termination of the system, which produced this monster.

The predilection for the imperial model and the rejection of the priestly model was not only a fervent choice of the Mesopotamian monotheists, but also an explicit statement made by the Biblical God: "the more priests there were, the more they sinned against me; they exchanged their glorious God for something disgraceful" (Hosea 4:7).

Maintaining the material yoke over the captives was a permanent concern for the sacerdotal colleges that propagated one delusion after the other; despite the fact that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was preserved as narrative in the Torah, a) the ritualistic use of sex, b) the extraction of energy from the human lasciviousness and debauchery, and c) the utilization of the material-spiritual potency of all the initiates for purposes of social-religious prevalence and material control remained a practice for all types of priesthood. The advanced decay and the loss of the original faith were the reasons for which the ancient religions were practically dissolved or could not have a serious impact anymore.

VII. Spirituality, the five elements, and the wrong sources of modern Western mystics

During the Late Antiquity, spirituality turned out to mean desecrated spiritual potency exerted by immoral mystics, Gnostics, and high priests who had to perform always more miracles in order to attract more followers. In this regard, Christianity was only a smart project of two colleges of Iranian and Egyptian priests settled in Rome. These Mithraists and the Memphists intended to extract the energy of their believers, i.e. fanaticized people whose total dedication was offered to narratives about Jesus rather than to Jesus' preaching itself. The rise of Roman Christianity was a disaster for the Gnostics and the earlier monotheistic priesthoods, whereas the rise of Constantinopolitan and Cappadocian Christianity, as an ingenious and impetuous reaction, consisted in stark rejection of the Roman fallacy.

The arrival of Islam, which in its original form was not another religion properly speaking, but a rejection of the heretical narratives about Jesus, a strong devotion to his preaching, and an effort to ascertain his faith, consisted in an effort to offer people another chance to reestablish synergy of the body and the soul in themselves after the examples of Moses, Elijah, Jonah, Jesus, Muhammad and Ali.

From the Brethren of Purity (إخوان‌ الصفا /Ikhwan al-Ṣafa) to Muḥyiddin Ibn Arabi to Safi-ad-Din Ardabili, a great number of mystics founded tariqas (orders) that do not differ essentially from the Hesychast esotericism of St. Gregory Palamas. But their failure to oppose and eliminate a) the theological dogmatism (within both, Islamic and Christian, contexts), b) the numerous yet absurd versions of rationalism, c) the treacherous and impious notions of nominalism, and d) the persistent but calamitous impact of Greco-Roman philosophy prevented a great number of Christian and Muslim mystics from bringing spirituality back to the epicenter of human life.

It was only a matter of time for fanatics to take possession of Islam and spread darkness and ignorance from Ottoman Constantinople; when the Observatory of Taqi ad-Din Muhammad ibn Maaruf was attacked and destroyed (1580) by a lunatic mob guided by ignorant, silly, and vicious Sunni theologians, the indivisible corpus of Islamic science and spirituality was considered as the enemy of the prevailing bogus-Islamic dogma and therefore persecuted by the Satanic sheikhulislams.

In Western Europe both, secular spiritual movements (like the Cathars, the Templars, the Rosicrucians, etc.) and Christian orders (Benedictines, Jesuits), originated from the Gnostics and several religious priesthoods of the Late Antiquity. It was inevitable for the former to lose a large part of their documentation and spiritual potency as they were clandestine organizations and for the latter -as the winners- to indulge themselves in very immoral and sinful mindset, attitude and behavior. Even worse, the persistent clash of the two spiritual nebulae brought forth disproportionate hatred, abysmal negativity, and further spiritual loss.

There is no spirituality wherever the lie exists, let alone prevails; there is only the curse of God (קִלְלַת אלוהים/kalalt Elohim) there. This concerns not only the Jesuits and the pseudo-Freemasons (launched in England in 1717; about whom we have already discussed), but also the fake Rosicrucian orders of our times, namely the so-called Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross (1750s–1790s), the bogus-Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (1887–1903), and the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (1865–present). They all usurped the name of Christian Rosenkreuz with whom they have nothing in common and whose spiritual heritage they viciously loath. On the contrary, the early 17th c. German Rosicrucians trustworthily reflected the spiritual inheritance left and the masterful example of life offered by Christian Rosenkreuz, although I don't accept all three manifestos as unbiased.

By having Late Antiquity Gnostics as their masters and points of reference, almost all the modern European mystics, psychics and magicians failed to perceive accurately and comprehensively the spiritual universe. Few great scholars and mystics make the exception in this regard, the likes of Herman of Karantania (Carinthia; 1105-1154) and Christian Rosenkreuz (1378-1484); this is so, because they traveled in Africa and Asia and contacted Muslim, Jewish, Oriental Christian, Parsi Zoroastrian masters and scholars there.

In terms of Spiritual Ontology, the most common mistake that deceitful mystics, occultists, and spiritual fraudsters, such as Helena Blavatsky, Rudolf Steiner, George Gurdjieff, Aleister Crowley, Alice Bailey, and many others made was the absurd acceptance of the following four as the basic elements in nature: Earth, Water, Air and Fire. Franz Bardon certainly broke with this erroneous and misleading tradition, by systematically stating that at the origin of all is Ether. All the same, when their sources were wrong, they were predestined to spiritual failure, moral misconduct, and final damnation.

As a matter of fact, they could not perform better, because their readings and their references were misleading. All these authors were not in a position to go through authoritative sacred texts of superior societies like those of 3rd millennium BCE Mesopotamia and Egypt and have thus access to original spirituality. The cuneiform and hieroglyphic sources, which would help them best comprehend and sense the spiritual universe, were not yet deciphered or they were deciphered but few texts were published, transliterated, and translated - let alone analyzed.

Even more importantly, Water cannot be considered as one element, but two. Late Antiquity Gnostics were totally disoriented and misled in this regard. In striking contrast, early cosmological narratives and sacred texts clearly differentiate between Soft Waters (Apsu/Ocean) and Salt Waters (Tiamat/Sea). The latter is in fact the 'survival' (or 'maintenance') of the pre-creational chaos within the Order of the Creation. Salt Waters (Sea) is what humans must most categorically abstain from; this is what Jesus named "the Father of the Devil" (John 8:44). At this point, Modern English translations are wrong, because they repeat a mistake already made in the Vulgate. And by using this phrase, Jesus takes position against the theory as per which Elohim created the Devil; by so doing, Jesus is evidently closer to Assyrian-Babylonian cosmological standards and concepts than to Old Testament notions.  

On the other hand, Fire is not an original element; it is a subordinate or derivative element that emanates from the Salt Waters. As such, Fire is a soiling substance that was duly reviled by all the early humans. Indeed, it was forcefully introduced as 'holy' element by the devilish, early Mithraic priesthood in Central Asia. Zoroaster and the Achaemenid dynasty of Iran engaged in ferocious and merciless battles against the abominable Mithraic Magi, who intended to impose their polytheistic dogma in Iran and to make the Iranians consider Fire as a 'holy' element. 

It goes without saying that the ontological differentiation is considerable and stern; it impacts Spiritual Anthropology in a most disastrous way. "Four Elements" (Earth, Water, Air and Fire) instead of "Five Elements" (Ether, Earth, Soft Waters, Air and Salt Waters): this is enough to cause detrimental changes in the spiritual exercises one may make, and this development may impact enormously the ascetic soldier.

I read with great interest your email's last paragraphs about your life; for me there are not 'better' or 'worse' persons in this life. Even if many sins are involved in the life of a person, while another person committed only few and minor transgressions, the lives of the humans are independent trajectories like comets the deeper meaning and function of which only God knows. I therefore find it very normal to always expect to learn from anyone and from anything; consequently, I never comment on others' lives and life models, merely accepting or rejecting at the very personal level and on the basis of my standards (that I have progressively established during my life). That is why I admire always the people, who can offer life examples whatever their socio-professional life or economic status may be - either they lived in Iran like me or they explored India like you!

Many thanks for your time, responses, advice and attachments!

Best regards,

Shamsaddin

================

Download the article in PDF:

megalommatiscomments

Spiritual Potency, the Loss & the Recovery thereof: from Adapa (Adam) to Gilgamesh to the End Times

How God created Man and men in Sumer, Akkad and Egypt fashioned the mankind by creating gods Духовная сила, ее утрата и восстановление: от А

academia.edu

Spiritual Potency, the Loss & the Recovery thereof: from Adapa (Adam) to Gilgamesh to the End Times

How God created Man and men in Sumer, Akkad and Egypt fashioned the mankind by creating gods Духовная сила, ее утрата и восстановление: от А

Patreon

Spiritual Potency, the Loss & the Recovery thereof: from Adapa (Adam) to Gilgamesh to the End Times | Megalommatis

Get more from Megalommatis on Patreon

Scythian mummy tomb (Fifth Pazyryk Kurgan), Pazyryk culture 3rd C. BCE. More pictures on my blog, link at bottom.

"The pair were buried alongside nine horses, a huge cache of cannabis and a stash of priceless treasures - including the world's oldest carpet and an ornate carriage.

The man had curly hair and was aged between 55 and 60 when he died, whilst the woman was about ten years younger.

It is believed he was a chieftain or king of the Pazyryk civilisation, which lived in Kazakhstan, Siberia and Mongolia from the 6th to 3rd centuries BC."

...

"The attractive log cabin was a prefabricated construction by the prehistoric Pazyryk culture to house an elite tomb - in which was buried a mummified curly-haired potentate and his younger wife or concubine.

The mound in the Altai Mountains was originally 42 metres in diameter, and this tattooed couple went to the next life alongside nine geldings, saddled and harnessed.

The house itself, recently reconstructed, was not built as a dwelling but nevertheless is seen by archeologists as showing the style of domestic architecture more than two millennia ago.

This structure was the outer of two wooden houses in the large burial mound in the valley of the River Bolshoy Ulagan at an altitude of around 1,600 metres above sea level.

The core of the mound including the ice-preserved bodies of the elite couple had been excavated by Soviet archeologists in 1949, and many of the finds are on on display in the world famous State Hermitage Museum in St Petersburg.

As we have previously written, the pair - who owned perhaps the world’s oldest carpets - are currently undergoing an ultra modern medical scan to establish the cause of death, and reconstruct the appearance of the ancient pair, and to study the techniques of mummification in more detail.

Yet in 1949 this fascinating house was left in the permafrost ground - and only retrieved now from the so-called Fifth Pazyryk Barrow, to the excitement of archeologists.

Head of the excavation Dr Nikita Konstantinov from Gorno-Altaisk State University, was full of admiration about the skills of the ancient craftsmen.

‘We took out the log house and reassembled it right next to the mound,’ he said.

‘We made kind of express reconstruction, which made it possible to study the log house in detail.

‘Notches were made on each of its logs - building marks…’.

This was like IKEA instructions today for building their products, telling modern day excavation volunteers how to correctly construct the prehistoric building kit.

The result is seen in the pictures shown here.

‘This log house was first built somewhere away from the mound, then it was dismantled, brought and reassembled in the pit,’ said Dr Konstantinov.

‘Today we build in similar way, using Roman numerals, as a rule.

‘In those times they simply made different numbers of notches.’

The archeological team followed the code left by the ancient craftsmen and reassembled the house without problems.

‘The Pazyryks knitted the corners of the building in a masterly way and chopped the attachment points of these logs.

‘They fitted very cleanly….

‘When we built the log house and began to measure the height, it turned out that the height difference in the angles is only one centimetre.’

In modern constructions, a difference of 7 cm is allowed which showed how skilful were the ancient craftsmen.

He said: ‘This is a funerary structure, but we can say with a high degree of probability that the log cabin was created in the image and likeness of the houses in which the Pazyryks lived."

-taken from siberiantimes and thesun

paganimagevault.blogspot.com

Scythian mummy tomb (Fifth Pazyryk Kurgan), Pazyryk culture 4th-3rd C. BCE

From Ferdowsi to the Seljuk Turks, Nizam al Mulk, Nizami Ganjavi, Jalal ad-Din Rumi & Haji Bektash  

By Prof. Muhammet Şemsettin Gözübüyükoğlu (Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis)

Pre-publication of chapter XXIII of my forthcoming book “Turkey is Iran and Iran is Turkey – 2500 Years of indivisible Turanian – Iranian Civilization distorted and estranged by Anglo-French Orientalists”; chapter XXIII constitutes the Part Nine (Fallacies about the Golden Era of the Islamic Civilization). The book is made of 12 parts and 33 chapters.

----------------------------------------------------  

Read and download the chapter here:

Continental Empires

From Ferdowsi to the Seljuk Turks, Nizam al Mulk, Nizami Ganjavi, Jalal ad-Din Rumi & Haji Bektash

History, Ancient History, Silk-, Spice- Perfume Roads, Spirituality, Faith,

historikon.substack.com

From Ferdowsi to the Seljuk Turks, Nizam al Mulk, Nizami Ganjavi, Jalal ad-Din Rumi & Haji Bektash

By Prof. Muhammet Şemsettin Gözübüyükoğlu (Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis)

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989

Кузьма Мегаломматис, Энлиль: мировая мифология, Греческая педагогическая энциклопедия, 1989

Kosmas Megalommatis, Enlil: Weltmythologie, Griechische Pädagogische Enzyklopädie, 1989

Kosmas Gözübüyükoğlu, Enlil: Dünya Mitolojisi, Yunan Pedagoji Ansiklopedisi, 1989

قزمان ميغالوماتيس، انلیل : اساطیر جهانی، دایره المعارف آموزشی یونانی، 1989

Côme Megalommatis, Enlil: Mythologie mondiale, Encyclopédie pédagogique grecque, 1989

1989 قزمان ميغالوماتيس، إنليل: الأساطير العالمية، الموسوعة التربوية اليونانية،

Cosimo Megalommatis, Enlil: mitologia mondiale, Enciclopedia pedagogica greca, 1989

Cosimo Megalommatis, Enlil: mitología mundial, Enciclopedia pedagógica griega, 1989

Cosmas Megalommatis, Enlil: World Mythology, Greek Pedagogical Encyclopedia, 1989

--------------------

Скачать PDF-файл: / PDF-Datei herunterladen: / Télécharger le fichier PDF : / PDF dosyasını indirin: / :PDF قم بتنزيل ملف / Download PDF file: / : یک فایل دانلود کنید / Κατεβάστε το PDF:

slideshare.net

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία-1989 - Download as a PDF or view online for free

Patreon

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989 | Megalommatis

Get more from Megalommatis on Patreon

calameo.com

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία - 1989

Κοσμάς Μεγαλομμάτης, Ενλίλ: Παγκόσμια Μυθολογία, Ελληνική Εκπαιδευτική Εγκυκλοπαίδεια, 1989 Кузьма Мегаломматис, Энлиль: мировая мифология,

The Collective West, its Mysteries, Illusions and Threats against the Mankind

Contents

Introduction

I. Colonization: worldwide imposition of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model

II. The Western world: an abnormal self-denial and a terrorist rebuff of the History of mankind

III. The interminable internecine wars of the West, its composite nature, and the ensuing concerns for the rest of the world

IV. Westernization is not 'à la carte'

V. Westernization is part of eschatological agendas

De-Westernization for Russia, Africa, the Muslim world, India, China and Latin America means a) replacement of the fallacious 'Greco-Roman' and 'Judeo-Christian' material from academic curricula and educational manuals and b) substitution of the past documentation with major specimens of Asiatic and African Art, which bear witness to the historical interaction of the world's major civilizations. Example: back panels from the couch found in the tomb of the Sogdian merchant and nobleman An Jia (安伽), who was buried in Chang'an (長安), today's Xi'an (西安市), great Chinese capital, in 579 CE, founding year of the Daxiang (大象) era, during the reign of Emperor Jing; currently in the Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology; the representations of few significant moments of the deceased nobleman's life involve scenes of cult, meetings with nomad leaders, and conclusion of agreements.

In a previous article published few days ago under the title "World Politics as Black & White: Iran and Israel or how people fall victims of delusions intentionally projected on them", I made it clear that every sectarian thought does not only constitute a sin, but it also leads to misunderstanding, ultimately plunging the foolish guy, who thinks in this manner, into a delusion. From such traps there is usually no comeback.

Simple people and world-known statesmen are equally concerned in this regard, but the latter may destroy their respective countries in the process. You can read the article here: https://megalommatiscomments.wordpress.com/2024/05/16/world-politics-as-black-white-iran-and-israel-or-how-people-fall-victims-of-delusions-intentionally-projected-on-them/

There are many foolish guys worldwide, who persistently do not see the historical truth in Palestine; they believe a genocide that they never saw and they don’t believe a genocide that they see with their own eyes. And there are numerous inane people, who imagine that the ongoing war in Ukraine has -practically speaking- ended with the victory of Russia. More advanced daydreamers are convinced that the "collective West" has collapsed and that the BRICS+ are about to establish a new world order – or, if this expression embarrasses you, a multipolar world community. There is nothing more delusional than this.

I must however admit that a large part of my readers have been accustomed (and pleased) to reading my devastating attacks, denunciations and rejections of the colonial deeds of the maritime kingdoms which are -exclusively- responsible for every single problem that occurs in the world nowadays. But …….

Because I totally, overwhelmingly and comprehensively decry the evildoing of the colonial powers across the Earth, this does not mean that I expect their opponents to prevail anytime soon. Not at all! At least, not without major changes coming from the side of the BRICS+!

Introduction

Actually, my personal evaluation of the current situation is very negative; I am convinced that the world affairs are very ambiguous, very grim and very ominous, because the major continental states, their elites, and their governments are unable to accurately assess where the overall problem lies and to subsequently find the correct remedy.

It is correct to conclude nowadays that the "collective West" is in disarray, discord, disorder and decay. But so they were in 1492, in 1520, and in 1532, when they sailed to the so-called 'New World' (which was already known for thousands of years to ancient Oriental nations) and, in the name of the Satanic Anti-Christ of the Catholic Church, they intentionally performed the first two of a really long series of abhorrent genocides against the highly civilized Aztecs and Incas, also enslaving numerous other nations and ethnic-religious groups in the process.

All the same; this has always been the fate of the 'West', which consists in an abysmal anomaly in the History of Mankind. The barbarians of Western Europe always exported their problems to the rest of the world in order to survive. As a matter of fact, the Western elites accept as 'civilized nations' only the slaves of their fabrication, i.e. the so-called 'Western Civilization'.

When it comes to the non-Western world, the perverse idiots, who believe in the existence of a so-called Western Civilization, are the worst enemies of mankind and the most unrepentant traitors of their nations.

All the same, the so-called 'Western Civilization' is a villainous fabrication of the Western European barbarians, which was incessantly propagated, tyrannically imposed, preached as the 'sole civilization', praised as an all-human acquisition, declared as 'universal', and therefore meant (or hinted) as 'compulsory for every civilized human being'. This is of course entirely racist, but this is still a minor issue.

In fact, if the fabrication 'Western Civilization' stayed only within the circumference of the 15th–16th c. Western European states, it would never become a worldwide problem and, even more happily for the rest of the world, it would soon disintegrate, driving the Western European nations to extinction. When it comes to the vicious and premeditated propagation, imposition and acclamation of this construct, people all over the world must take into account the following five crucial aspects of the phenomenon:

a. Colonization is tantamount to Westernization;

b. The 'Western world' is first, an abnormal self-denial and second, a terrorist rebuff of the historical evolution of mankind;

c. The permanent internecine wars of the West demonstrate its composite nature;  

d. Westernization cannot be 'à la carte' for anyone anytime anywhere and under any circumstances whatsoever; and

e. Westernization is part of eschatological agendas - not an intellectual caprice, an academic arrogance, a moral deviation or a mental degeneration 

I. Colonization: worldwide imposition of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model

Extensively but deliberately propagated as an economic affair, colonization is basically the premeditated exportation and the brutal imposition of the inhuman Western European civilizational model on the rest of the world. As a matter of fact, Colonization is Westernization. The first crucial aspect of the nefarious phenomenon is that, by means of military, political, economic, educational, religious, spiritual, intellectual, academic, scientific, cultural, technological, socio-behavioral and mental colonization, the aforementioned construct was repressively imposed worldwide.

After five centuries of persistent, mendacious, and oppressive effort, Westernization became finally inherent (in different degree) to everyone - with the only exception of the blessed people who happened to live in remote areas and remained unaffected from or immune to it.

The calamitous process started in Western Europe (namely the territories of today's Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, Holland, Belgium, England, Scotland, and Ireland) and then it was transferred / relocated to the Occupied Territories which conventionally are now called 'USA', 'Canada' and 'Australia'; for this reason, all these lands (along with French Polynesia, New Caledonia, New Zealand, etc.) are called the 'Collective West'. It was from those lands that emanated the multifaceted and multilayered colonization process that can also be called 'Westernization'.

Quite contrarily, Latin America -from Mexico to Argentina and Chile- is not part of the 'Collective West', although undoubtedly many Western Europeans settled there. The continent where the great civilizations of the Mayas, the Aztecs and the Incas had grown is a colonized continent, and the indigenous populations which de facto constitute the majority of the people must take their land back, impose their culture, religions and values, and terminate the colonial shame that started before 500 years.

Decolonization-de-Westernization is necessary to Latin America too.

Similarly and more critically, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Central Europe, the Balkan Peninsula, and the Scandinavian Peninsula do not truly constitute part of the 'Collective West; it is well-known that Austria-Hungary was aptly dragged by the Catholic Church into interminable wars against the Ottoman Empire, but this fact was the mistake of both imperial administrations which failed to assess the ignominious plans elaborated by the Anti-Christian Church of Rome against Constantinople and Vienna at the same time.

Later, Imperial Germany became also the victim of the papal plots, entering into academic, intellectual, economic and military competition with the then 'Collective West'; but this was exactly the trap! Attempting to acquire material gains against the English and the French, Germany started becoming part of the 'Club of the Evil', whereas it would be pertinent for the interests of the German Nation to fully oppose it. As a matter of fact, by competing with the Westerners in any sense, you simply get westernized, i.e. colonized – without even understanding it. Clearly, decolonization-de-Westernization is necessary to those parts of Europe too.

For the above reasons and due to many other parameters, it is safe to claim that every discussion about the 'economic motives' and the 'political predominance' of the colonial powers is merely a smokescreen. The same is valid for the often evoked 'missionary work'; it was only the camouflage. In fact, the Western countries invaded most of the other nations, lands and continents only to impose their construct, namely the inhuman Western European civilizational model.

Establishing an oligarchical economic system of social exploitation and arbitrarily imposing a parliamentary system of social deception in one colonized land are not enough for the devilish and criminal elites of the 'Collective West'! The colonized countries must always be in phase with the Western metropolises, when it comes to educational, religious, spiritual, intellectual, academic, scientific, cultural, technological, socio-behavioral matters.    

II. The Western world: an abnormal self-denial and a terrorist rebuff of the History of mankind

The second crucial aspect concerns the formation of the West itself. This is a most concealed topic, as a systematic, comprehensive and monstrous misinterpretation of the historical facts was composed and propagated to compactly confuse people in the West and in the rest of the world. Because Western universities and museums, libraries, mass media, intellectuals and governments gave to the 'Collective West' a fallacious historicity, numerous explorers, investigators, commentators and historians were driven to the confusion that the divide between East and West existed always. This is entirely wrong.

The appellation "Ancient Oriental Empires" is the beginning of the historical fallacy. The great civilizations of Mesopotamia (Sumer, Elam, Akkad, Assyria, Babylonia, Hurrians, Aramaeans, etc.), the Nile Valley (Egypt/Kemet, Cush/Sudan), Anatolia (Hittites, Hatti, Luwians, etc.), Syria-Palestine (Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Hebrews, etc.), the Iranian plateau, the Caucasus region, Central Asia, Siberia and Mongolia, the African Atlas (Berbers, Carthaginians, etc.), India, Bengal, the Deccan, and China were all "central to the world", according to their own standards, sources and world conceptualization.

Designating these civilizations, peoples and empires as "Oriental" necessitates the preposterous anticipation that the center of the world was situated elsewhere and these entities were located east of the center. Limiting considerations at the purely natural and geographical level is certainly normal, and it was done by all in the Antiquity. But extending the geographical notion to the cultural-civilizational level constitutes an absurd categorization and a discriminatory distinction. And on this racist foundation has been built the pseudo-historical dogma of the 'Collective West'. But in order to be close to factual data, I have to continue. 

What is now called 'Ancient Greece' was an unimportant, marginal and mostly uncivilized circumference to the Ancient so-called 'Oriental' world; the distinctive tribes that are now conventionally called 'Ancient Greeks' failed to establish an empire of universal vocation. Culturally, morally and spiritually different from them, Alexander the Great of Macedonia invaded part of Greece and forced some of the local worthless states to contribute to the exploit of substituting the ailing Achaemenid Iran with a more genuine universal empire.

Ancient Rome was also a peripheral and insignificant city that was transformed from kingdom to 'res publica' and later to empire; the Roman expansion was mainly due to the rivalry with Carthage, which was the ancient world's most democratic and most republican state. However, after the disintegration of the shameful 'res publica', the Romans failed to build a genuine and universal empire after the example of Egypt, Babylonia or Assyria, despite Rome's unprecedented contest and endless wars with the Arsacid and the Sassanid empires of Iran. These wars lasted almost 700 years (54 BCE – 628 CE), but their echo lasted until 1453, as Mehmet II the Conqueror viewed in himself an Iranian vanquisher of the Romans.

The Christianization of the Roman Empire demonstrated its limits; in fact, despite of a very sophisticated administrative-military organization, the state could not hold together. The main reason for this situation was the fact that no empire can possibly be created around a sea; there was never an empire around the Black Sea or the Caspian Sea. And when all the coastlands of the Red Sea belonged to the Islamic Caliphates, the gravitational center of all these different states (Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid, Mamluk, and Ottoman) was not situated in the Red Sea region. 

However, due to the universal or ecumenical vocation of the Christian faith as per the Fathers of the Christian Church, following the division of the Christian Roman Empire (395 CE), the Eastern Roman Empire developed an ecumenical character that it retained for several centuries. But the terms used for the division of the Roman Empire were purely geographical, having no cultural-civilizational meaning. The same was also valid after the schisms (Photian: 863-867; final: 1054); the differences between the Eastern Roman Empire (Orthodox Christianity) and the Catholic Church were only religious, canonical and imperial, because the Roman pope interfered in the various states of Western Europe in order to generate opponents to the Eastern Roman Emperor. And it so continued until the Fall of Constantinople (1453) to the Ottomans.

In other words, prior to the Renaissance, there was never a cultural-civilizational differentiation between 'East' and 'West', because the Western Europeans, like all the civilized humans across the Earth, viewed the world civilizations across the Earth as a unitary phenomenon.  

It is the entire Renaissance phenomenon that changed the Western Europeans, but as such, it first led them to an absurd self-denial. In its nucleus, Renaissance is an arbitrary approach to the Western Europeans' pre-Christian past, involving a deliberate idealization of the daily life and the activities of the pagan ancestors of the 14th, 15th and 16th c. Western Europeans. In real terms, it is an illusion that they produced and believed, before exporting it to the unfortunate others. But this totally ahistorical illusion was at the same time a full and complete rejection of the Western Europeans themselves, i.e. of their own Christian identity.

The progressive imposition of the illusory Antiquity on the 14th, 15th and 16th c. Western Europeans was carried out by different mystical, religious, intellectual and academic elites in a way that worsened the trouble caused because of the apparent detachment from reality. Rejecting their true, Christian identity and adopting an unreal ideal, the Renaissance elites went from disbelief to degeneracy, from deviation to corruption, from paranoia to madness, from delusion to disorder, and from being to non-being. Viewed in terms of massive social phenomenon, Renaissance is the only true Holocaust in the History of Mankind. It consists in a most comprehensive spiritual genocide that the then Western European ruling classes performed against themselves and their own peoples.

Being cut off from their identity and recent past which they 'excommunicated', the sick elites of Western European Renaissance were left with only one option: they had to

a) unquestionably, inevitably, and unrepentantly conquer and massacre the others,

b) forcefully change the identity of the survivors (: make them look like 'copies' of Western Europeans), and

c) flee ahead to even more unreal, more inhuman, and more absurd notions.

This means that they subsequently produced even more unrealistic schemes, lunatic concepts, illusory descriptions, and delusional suggestions, which ultimately led to worse types of colonization, repression, bloodshed, cruelty, and wars.

It goes without saying that these elites will inevitably resort to nuclear conflagration and total annihilation of mankind if they fail to materialize the incessantly more unrealistic projects, which are mere paragraphs of their ominous agendas.

We can therefore easily understand that the East-West (Orient vs. Occident) dilemma is a forgery; in fact, what we call nowadays the 'Collective West' consists in

1) the corruption of a part of the Mankind (namely the Western Europe),

2) the subsequent secession of that part of the world from the rest, and

3) the opposition to, and denial of, the rest of mankind, which is indiscriminately and pejoratively labeled as 'Orient'.

III. The interminable internecine wars of the West, its composite nature, and the ensuing concerns for the rest of the world

Many people are nowadays impressed because of the collapse of the so-called Franco-German axis within European Union (EU); but what is there to be possibly impressed with? Personally, I rather tend to believe that the so-called Berlin-Paris axis lasted for long. Taking into consideration the past that Western Europe has had after the Christianization of the Roman Empire (313-380 CE) and its final division into two parts (395 CE), we have to find the present divisions within EU as quite normal.

Contrarily to what happened in the Eastern Roman Empire with the prevailing Caesaropapism (which is tantamount to absolute prevalence of the emperor over the patriarch), in the ill-fated and short-lived Western Roman Empire, the pope of Rome prevailed over the local emperor by means of a well-orchestrated deception (and this is called Papo-Caesarism). Even worse, the papal authority devised an ignominious plan as per which barbarian 'kingdoms' ruled by idiotic thugs would supplant the Western Roman Empire as an imperial institution, thus leaving the pope as the sole ruler of Western Europe.

By ceaselessly pursuing divisive tactics and by keeping a balance among the barbarian rulers, the counterfeit administration of Anti-Christian Rome, while fervently fighting against the Eastern Roman Empire, implemented systematically a devilish policy of acculturation during the long process of Christianization of the uncivilized migrant tribes in the lands of today's Northern Italy, France, Spain, Portugal, England and Ireland. This means that in fact all these populations never became truly Christian, but believed that they were Christian while remaining pagan, cruel and incestuous.

Quite contrarily, in the truly Christian Eastern Roman Empire, the emperor and the patriarch implemented methodically different approaches to the successive waves of migrating nations, i.e. religious integration, cultural assimilation and administrative incorporation. The alternative solution was always military victory, expulsion and dispersion of the enemy. For this reason, in the Eastern Roman Empire there were few religious quarrels and conflicts, whereas in Western Europe there were endless tribal, feudal and later monarchical hostilities, which were always wars of plunder.

Consequently, spiritual, religious, doctrinal and theological opposition went extinct in the Eastern Roman Empire after the 9th c., but across Western Europe, numerous groups survived in clandestine form from the times of Late Antiquity until the 15th c. The Eastern Roman Emperors never faced an opponent like the Knights Templar; but the papal power, which was never counterbalanced by any royal (and the exceptions only confirm the rule), was unable to uproot secret movements and doctrinal factions that challenged its authority in later periods, because they had aptly managed to penetrate several religious orders and the papal hierarchy.

With the gradual arrival of Ashkenazi 'Jews' in Northern and Central Europe (9th–10th c.), the admixture (or if you prefer the circulation) of elites that formed the modern Western world (also known as the 'Collective West') was ready. Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) understood it quite well. Consequently, it was only normal for Western Europeans to experience interminable internecine wars, while expanding colonially. This fact only reveals the composite nature of Western Europe; it also explains the present conjuncture.

Originating from diverse religious societies of the Late Antiquity, the three main forces, which composed Modern Europe and controlled the world by means of colonization, always managed to make compromises for their reciprocal interests in spite of the enormous differences that their eschatological agendas comprise. The three most influential groups (or 'nebulae' if you prefer) are the following: the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists. About their agendas and remote antiquity, you can find general information in my earlier publications:                                                                                                 

academia.edu

Zionist - Freemasonic - Jesuit Agendas in Conflict or Superposition: End Times' Sequence & Trajectories

First published in: https://megalommatis.wordpress.com/2017/06/08/zionist-freemasonic-jesuit-agendas-in-conflict-or-superposition-end-times-

and

academia.edu

Antiquity & Eschatology of Freemasonic, Jesuit & Zionist Orders as Vector of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Античность и эсхатология масонских, иезуитских и сионистских орденов как вектор израильско-палестинского конфликта -------- Contents Introdu

Quite interestingly, I read only recently a compelling article about the intentions toward Russia that three major groups of the Collective West have; it was first published before one year (8 May 2023). Titled Шахматы войны (Chess of War), the article was authored by the world-known Russian intellectual Alexander Dugin (https://katehon.com/ru/article/shahmaty-voyny). For an English translation (by Lorenzo Maria Pacini): https://www.geopolitika.ru/en/article/chess-war

The article was written after a chess-like style and that is why the 'Collective West' is designated as "Black", meaning a black set of chess. In his second part (Black's centers), A. Dugin makes the following distinction:

«With Black we can distinguish three main macro-figures, which are not symmetrical with each other, but each of them has a sufficient degree of sovereignty to actively influence the course of the entire confrontation. We have named them as follows:

The party of complete and immediate victory over Russia

The party of delayed victory over Russia

The party of indifference to Russia».

In fact, the first 'party' represents the Zionists; the second 'party' corresponds fully to the Jesuits, their world conceptualization, mentality, attitude, and agenda. And the third 'party' can clearly be identified with some leading Freemasonic lodges (at this point, I have to clarify that there is an ongoing fierce dispute among several apostate lodges). 

Further expanding upon "the party of total and immediate victory over Russia", Alexander Dugin identifies it as the "most radical part of the globalists", stating more specifically that it consists of "the British secret services, which act in close connection with certain US neo-conservative centers (Kagan, Nuland, Kristol) and with the Pentagon and CIA circles close to them".

Focusing on "the party of delayed victory over Russia" (i.e. the second of the three groups), A. Dugin exemplifies the group with the Roman Catholic General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces, a ferocious enemy of former US President Donald Trump. While explaining the geopolitical positions of this group, the Russian intellectual adds current US President Biden in the picture: "This is the position of Biden himself and most of his administration".

When it comes to the third party (or "The indifference’s party"), A. Dugin draws the political portrait of Donald Trump: "the position of those American political forces that do not identify US interests with globalism, do not rely on the rules of Atlanticist geopolitics (where the main goal of the Anglo-Saxon civilisation of the sea is an overwhelming victory over the Eurasian civilisation of the land, i.e. sovereign Russia), and are therefore indifferent to Russia, which, on a soberly pragmatic analysis, does not threaten US national interests - neither in the military nor in the economic field - in general". He then epitomizes it by adding that "this is exactly the position expressed by former US President Donald Trump. His claims, that if he becomes US President again the conflict in Ukraine will immediately cease, are not boastfulness, but pure realism".

The composite nature of the 'Collective West' and the total control that the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists exercise over the governments and the societies of Western Europe and North America (and through them over the rest of the world) are indeed very preoccupying issues and quite determinant factors for the rest of the world. This is so for the following four reasons:

a) the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model that Western European elites imposed first locally and then worldwide is similarly a composite corpus of notions; it contains gravely divergent concepts that were finally adopted after many gradual, trilateral compromises.

b) in the same manner, the bogus-historical dogma, which was elaborated by Western European academics and then colonially imposed worldwide, is also a composite patchwork. This can be attested in several terms, which are meaningless for the rest of the world, but in fact, they are the result of compromises. Examples:

'Greco-Roman world', 'Hellenistic and Roman' times, 'Judeo-Christian' culture, 'Helleno-Christian' civilization, 'Helleno-Orthodox' doctrine, etc.

c) at any given moment during the last 500 years, the flee ahead to even more unreal notions, ideas or theories led always to final compromises, modifications, and new composite constructs, which had Jesuit, Freemasonic and Zionist components and dimensions. The same is also valid for the conflicts ensued and the treaties signed at the end.  

d) even more importantly, the penetration of the Western elites into the rest of the world was also composite; this means that countries, parts and/or sectors of the non-Western world are controlled at all levels by representatives of the three groups of power. Due to this phenomenon, the internecine wars of the Western World have spread across the Earth, making of any potential disentanglement a very difficult and very dangerous option.

IV. Westernization is not 'à la carte'

Due to the situation described as per above, it is impossible for any non-Westerner to stand opposite to the 'Collective West', selecting only some of the theoretical systems, philosophical maxims, intellectual approaches, academic considerations, political ideologies, and governmental practices produced and implemented by the Western world. Although this attitude is not straightforwardly opposite to the Western world, it is considered as gravely inimical by the paranoid rulers of UK, US, EU, NATO and their satellites.

It is actually misplaced to attempt to view the modern Western world as a diachronic entity, because it was never such and it was not geared to be anything of the kind. You don't have the option to possibly accept 'this' and reject 'that'. It is true that, in every historical period after Renaissance, the Western elites came up with several theoretical options, governmental concepts, social ideals and philosophical concepts, which were entirely fallacious and still opposite to one another; at a later date, one of the conflicting poles may have subsided or eventually both were brought together, and a new -always delusional and inhuman- environment appeared. Many scholars described this type of developments as 'Hegelian', but in reality they were entirely Manichaean.

However, average people everywhere, either in the Western colonial metropolises or in the colonized peripheries, were always asked to promptly, duly and fully cope with the new environment. No feudal state was tolerated in the 19th c.; no imperial state was accepted in the 20th c.; and no Communist state is permitted in the 21st c. The 'logic' (truly speaking: the 'absurdity') of the conflicting Jesuit, Freemasonic and Zionist agendas that have formed the historical developments over the past 500 years is 'permanent update'. For this reason, the concept of 'evolution' (spread as delusion among people worldwide) was necessary to all major societies that rule the Western world: those who supported and promoted notions relating to Darwinism and those who opposed this theory.

The 'permanent updates' to which all have to concur every now and then have been scaled over the past five centuries, because in reality every delusion made, every change occurred, every development introduced, and every scheme implemented were either a distinct paragraph of one of the aforementioned agendas or the ultimate compromise between the divergent paragraphs of two among them.

The Westernization project that was launched since the first days of the Renaissance is a compact eschatological program of which no one can possibly accept only a part without signing his death warrant. This is true for anyone anytime anywhere and under any circumstances whatsoever; for this reason, every selective approach to the inhuman scheme of worldwide Westernization would inevitably constitute a certain opposition to the provisions of one of the existing agendas.  

This fact is not understood by several statesmen, politicians, diplomats, academics, intellectuals and religious authorities in countries other than the 'Collective West'; similarly, average people, who live in the Western world but still value their own cultural heritage, ancestral traditions, faith, moral, and spirituality, fail to grasp the true nature of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model and the ensuing Westernization of the world. They mistakenly think that 'only now' or 'only recently' the Westerners started 'forgetting' their past and values. However, this approach is shortsighted, narrow-minded, and totally false.

The error is due to the fact that all those, who find the so-called 'woke culture' or 'cancel culture' as a drastically different from the earlier Western norms, values and standards, have beforehand developed a diachronic view of the modern Western world. But this is very wrong. Over the past 500 years, people in the West passed through several, different from one another, stages; every stage was diverse from the previous and constituted (for the Western elites) an 'advanced step' if compared with earlier conditions of life.

The so-called 'woke culture' or 'cancel culture' looks very different from the average culture of Westerners in either Western Europe of North America in the 1930s, and this is true. But if we add to the equation few turning points or moments of upheaval like the May 1968 protests, the 1969 Woodstock festival, the lawless legalization of the abortion (1975 in France / "la Loi Veil"), and the evil decriminalization of the adultery (1987 in Belgium; 2006 in Romania), we understand that nothing happened suddenly or abruptly. Every step of moral degradation and social corruption of the Western societies was small enough and it was made slowly enough in order to be accepted over a period of time that was accorded to it.

Consequently, to the eyes of today's Western statesmen, academics and intellectuals (i.e. the puppets of the devilish Western elites) it appears as 'hypocritical' or 'absurd' or 'crazy' that statesmen, who reject today's Collective West, like President Putin of Russia, refer to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, admire Peter the Great (who attempted to emphatically westernize Russia), state publicly that they were inspired by Catherine the Great (who opened Russia to Western philosophers), and expect their approach to possibly please their eventual Western interlocutors or disreputable haters or to create a feeling of cultural-historical familiarity. The following articles are only indicative in this regard:

Putin, Citing Roosevelt, Hints at a 3rd-Term Bid

nytimes.com

Putin, Citing Roosevelt, Hints at a 3rd-Term Bid (Published 2010)

Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin of Russia has not dampened speculation that he is considering an effort to return to the presidency in the

Putin compares himself to Peter the Great in quest to take back Russian lands

the Guardian

Putin compares himself to Peter the Great in quest to take back Russian lands

President draws parallel with tsar who waged war on Sweden and says campaign in Ukraine stems from ‘basic values’

How Catherine the Great may have inspired Putin’s Ukraine invasion

The Conversation

How Catherine the Great may have inspired Putin’s Ukraine invasion

Is Catherine the Great a source of inspiration to Vladimir Putin? Her actions in Poland throughout her reign are remarkably similar to Putin

Vladimir Putin justifies his imperial aims in Tucker Carlson interview

The Conversation

Vladimir Putin justifies his imperial aims in Tucker Carlson interview

Why is there such a Russian focus on the Second World War? Because it’s used to justify authoritarian states, the rule of dictators like Put

However, President Putin was undoubtedly responsible for the 'mistakes'; the reason for this conclusion is due to the fact that the Westerners do not view their modern world as a diachronic entity but as a series of successive stages through which they reached the present status. Consequently, to the Western elites of today, Reagan, Roosevelt, Clemenceau, Napoleon, Louis XIV, and Charles V, pretty much like Hegel, Kant, Rousseau, Voltaire, Pascal, Shakespeare, du Bellay, Rabelais, and Giovanni Pico della Mirandola had a certain value but only as fully functioning factors of their times – not diachronically. Their importance (as it is viewed by the present Western elites) is their contribution to the developments of their time, but Rabelais (or any other 16th c. Western European intellectual) had become obsolete and meaningless at the time of Karl Marx, and subsequently, the latter is -in turn- truly excoriated today. The same approach applies to music, literature, art, theater, law, science, and -last but not the least- the manner of living.

It is crystal clear that this situation causes terrible troubles to the rest of the world, i.e. the colonized periphery; this is so because of the complex manner through which the colonization / Westernization process was carried out. Different countries in Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, Africa, and Latin America accepted diverse stages and aspects of the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model in distinct moments and junctures. This automatically makes of them the disparate members of a group that exists only in one dimension: that of being irrelevant to 15th-16th c. Western Europe.

Then, the fact that notable historical persons or a restricted elite from the past of one non-Western country may have accepted in their time a certain stage or an aspect of the Westernization project (which was later widely propagated across the nation in question) makes today the de-Westernization effort a very strenuous task for the said country to undertake. But this is another issue, because it concerns the non-Western world. Example: Western Theater was alien to the average Russian society of the time of Ivan IV the Terrible (1530-1584; reign after 1547); however, it was initially supported by the 18th c. royal elite, and it became gradually accepted by more people (mainly the nobles and the then rising Russian bourgeoisie). The Bolshoi Theater was built in Moscow before two centuries (1825), but it is a monument of Russia's Westernization. Many Russians, Christian or Muslim, rejected the Western notion of Theater at the time as an Anti-Russian abomination. All the same, if today's Russians want to reach out to the spiritual concept and imperial ideal of Holy Rus (Святая Русь), they will certainly have to allow their de-Westernization effort to cover that sector too.

As a matter of fact, it is certainly noteworthy that across the Earth numerous aspects of Westernization were accepted subliminally, and this situation will apparently necessitate an enormous effort during the process of liberation (de-Westernization) that those countries have definitely to launch.

V. Westernization is part of eschatological agendas

For the leading internal forces of the West, Westernization is the process needed for the implementation of variant eschatological agendas; in other words, the inhuman Western European 'civilizational' model was not an intellectual caprice, an academic arrogance, a moral deviation or a mental degeneration. It was the basic means that these forces have used to fool, corrupt and enslave their populations and the rest of the world, and -more importantly- to impose on them their eschatological agendas.   

The sinister Renaissance -with all its attributes and paraphernalia- was evidently conceived as the foreclosure of History. I can only admit that it simply failed to fully impose its barbarous, inhuman and evil scope and to comprehensively enforce its blasphemous delusion across the Earth in only 500 years. But the abysmal attempt to terminate History does not start with the infinitesimal, petty propagandist Francis Fukuyama and his absurd and nonsensical book.

It started with the ominous specter that the devilish Western European monks, priests, mystics, academics, intellectuals, artists, and statesmen devised before 500-600 years; this is the true, atrocious face of Renaissance, which still threatens all historical nations with spiritual and material extinction, having the nuclear sword of Damocles hanging over the head of the entire mankind. Actually, the conflagration was envisioned by Mani, the Iranian founder of Manichaeism, before almost 1800 years as the right and proper eschatological end of mankind. Lenore Marshall's essay "The Nuclear Sword of Damocles" (1971) came only too late for readers interested to discover their fate (https://energyhistory.yale.edu/lenore-marshall-the-nuclear-sword-of-damocles-1971/).

It is really foolish for theoreticians like Miriam Leonard to come to the conclusion that «Heidegger and Loraux articulate how the historical can and should act to disrupt the "final repression" of history. If difference "alone is historical through and through and from the start" it is also crucially able to resist the foreclosure of history». {The Uses of Reception Derrida and the Historical Imperative, p. 116-136 (see the last page); in: Classics and the Uses of Reception, Editor(s): Charles Martindale, Richard F. Thomas, 1 January 2006, Blackwell Publishing Ltd (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470774007)}

This is so because the concept of 'classics' is fallacious, ahistorical and intentionally delusional, whereas Western Europeans first and their colonized victims (starting from later dates) have already lived «the "final repression" of history» in the lapse of time between the diffusion of the Renaissance concepts and notions among them and the present moment. The atemporal period in which post-Renaissance people live is the disruption of history of which today's theoreticians are purposelessly afraid of; this is actually the final deception which was inevitably stated in the New Testament (2 Thessalonians 2:11/ καὶ διὰ τοῦτο πέμψει αὐτοῖς ὁ Θεὸς ἐνέργειαν πλάνης εἰς τὸ πιστεῦσαι αὐτοὺς τῷ ψεύδει,/ Ideo mittet illis Deus operationem erroris ut credant mendacio,/For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie.). 

The elaboration of eschatological agendas by the 'venerable elders' of the hierarchical societies that constitute the ruling elites of our world is something natural, normal and even intrinsic; average people today find it difficult to believe but it is not. One must never forget that these groups originate from diverse religious societies of the Late Antiquity. There is no religion without a version of Cosmogony, a description of Cosmology, and a salvatory narrative of Eschatology, i.e. 'Soteriology'. In fact, the secular appearance of those societies in our times constitutes only their smokescreen; but their members are in reality 'priests'.

Even more importantly, I have to point out here that several theories, philosophical systems, and ideologies conceived and propagated by members of the said societies are purely of eschatological content, although this is somewhat dissimulated. In fact, modern sciences, academic theories, philosophical systems, political ideologies, and even art movements are in reality dissimulated forms of eschatology. And there is no Cosmogony, Cosmology and Eschatology without an underlying notion of religion and spirituality.

That is why the Collective West and the colonized world have been submerged over the past 200 years in particular with (unidentified as such) eschatological narratives and systems. Utopian Socialism, Marxism-Leninism, Darwinism, Impressionism, Monism, Anarchism, Atheism, Fascism, Nazism, Materialism, Eugenics & Scientific Racism, Abstract Art, Robotism, Islamism, Christian Zionism, Liberalism, Leftism, Consumerism, and a multitude of other similar systems or subsystems are in reality Westernization-promoting parts of the eschatological agendas of the Jesuits, the Freemasons, and the Zionists.    

If the evangelized societies and the salutatory orations appear to be so distressing, gloomy and calamitous, and if many people across the Earth start discovering that these promises are totally dystopian and hellish, this is due to the totally evil nature of the ruling societies and the world elites. Not only are the initiated members of those organizations degenerate enough to see the Hell as an optimal choice, but their secret spiritual doctrines are counterfeit versions of religions.

To many it may appear odd that atheism, materialism and consumerism can be considered as forms of eschatology, but this is only the result of the deception carried out. People have been fooled up to the point of being unable to understand that, even if someone expresses the idea that the present society is perfect and makes the wish that it always stays the same, this is already a form of eschatology.

However, the inevitability of the final conflagration is only underscored by the fact that every eschatological narrative includes an unprecedented clash. And this is something that the evil high priests of these societies intend to bring about anytime soon. For this reason, it is foolish to take their supposed rationalism for granted.

Reason, reasoning and rationality have been propagated only to fool, distract and divert the rest: the Russians, the Indians, the Africans, the Latin Americans, the Chinese, and the Muslims. But only insanity, lunacy, paranoia and chaos prevail in the backside of the evil minds and the dark bottom of the venomous hearts of the ruling Western elites.  

The advantage of the first (nuclear) strike is the 'privilege' that the inhuman rulers of the Western world reserve for themselves; that's why they must be stripped of this prerogative. For this reason, it will be totally disastrous for the rest of the world not to isolate the Collective West. Instead of the nuclear conflagration that the evil elites of the West intend to cause in order to materialize their nauseating wickedness, a domestic implosion, a social explosion, and a final disintegration must be forcefully adjusted to European Union, UK, Canada, Australia, and the US.

All the same, de-Westernization is imperative and inevitable to all; otherwise, even if the Collective West disappears supernaturally, the non-de-Westernized states of BRICS+ will only function like Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, the Ottoman Empire, France, Italy, England, America and Japan on the eve of WWI. Then, the same cycle of wars and bloodshed will be lamentably repeated, the empires will be merely substituted by others, and the humans will be taken in the maelstrom of Tiamat.

==============

Download the article in PDF:

Patreon

The Collective West, its Mysteries, Illusions and Threats against the Mankind | Megalommatis

Get more from Megalommatis on Patreon

Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Ρωμιός ανάμεσα στη Χριστιανωσύνη & το Ισλάμ

ΑΝΑΔΗΜΟΣΙΕΥΣΗ ΑΠΟ ΤΟ ΣΗΜΕΡΑ ΑΝΕΝΕΡΓΟ ΜΠΛΟΓΚ “ΟΙ ΡΩΜΙΟΙ ΤΗΣ ΑΝΑΤΟΛΗΣ”

Το κείμενο του κ. Νίκου Μπαϋρακτάρη είχε αρχικά δημοσιευθεί την 16η Φεβρουαρίου 2018.

--------------  

Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Ρωμιός ανάμεσα στη Χριστιανωσύνη & το Ισλάμ

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2018/02/16/κοσμάς-μουχάμαντ-σαμσαντίν-μεγαλομμ/  

========================================  

Οι Ρωμιοί της Ανατολής – Greeks of the Orient

Ρωμιοσύνη, Ρωμανία, Ανατολική Ρωμαϊκή Αυτοκρατορία

Από τη συζήτηση που έγινε στο μπλογκ του καθ. Δημήτρη Κιτσίκη με βάση την ερώτηση ενός σχολιαστή.

https://endiameseperiochenea.blogspot.com/2018/02/405.html

Ioannnis February 12, 2018 at 5:29 AM

Γνωρίζετε γιατί ο κος Μεγαλομμάτης, άλλαξε πίστη από χριστιανός σε μουσουλμάνος, και από Κοσμάς σε Μουχάμαντ;

Απάντηση

Περίπου. Αν και είναι ένα θέμα για το οποίο ο ίδιος ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης, μουσουλμάνος από το 1992 και επίσημα από το 1994, δεν έχει ποτέ γράψει το παραμικρό. Επειδή έχω την τύχη να τον έχω γνωρίσει από κοντά, θα σας μεταφέρω τι μου είπε στην ερώτησή μου γιατί έγινε μουσουλμάνος.

Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Χριστιανός Ορθόδοξος που γίνεται Άθρησκος

Αλλά πριν από αυτό, θα πρέπει να διορθώσω κάπως την ερώτησή σας η οποία είναι σωστή μόνον κατά το ήμισυ. Ναι, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης γεννήθηκε στην Αθήνα από δύο χριστιανούς ορθόδοξους γονείς γεννημένους στην Ιωνία και στην Παφλαγονία και βαφτίστηκε χριστιανός ορθόδοξος με το όνομα του πατέρα του πατέρα του, Κοσμάς. Και ναι, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης σήμερα είναι μουσουλμάνος με τα δύο ονόματα Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν (κυρ. ‘ο ήλιος της θρησκείας’). Αλλά, και αυτό είναι ιδιαίτερο, αντίθετα με το τι λέτε στην ερώτησή σας, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης δεν “άλλαξε πίστη από χριστιανός σε μουσουλμάνος”.

Το ελληνικό επώνυμό τους επήραν οι πρόγονοί του φθάνοντας στην Ελλάδα στην δεκαετία του 1930. Στην Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία και στην Τουρκία η οικογένεια ονομαζόταν Gözübüyükoğlu (Γκιοζουμπουγιούκογλου) και το Μεγαλομμάτης είναι η σωστή ελληνική μετάφραση. Ήταν γεννημένοι στην Κασταμονή ο πατέρας του και στην Καισάρεια ο παππούς του μεγαλέμπορος ζάχαρης στην Τουρκία και χρηματιστής στην Ελλάδα. Στην οικογένειά του, όπως σε πολλές οικογένειες των ενδοτέρων της Μικράς Ασίας υπήρχαν και μουσουλμάνοι και χριστιανοί.

Μιλάει γι’ αυτό ο ίδιος σε μια online συνέντευξή του σε ένα πόρταλ ορισμένων Ορόμο επιστημόνων στις ΗΠΑ (οι Ορόμο είναι ένα μεγάλο, 45 εκ. πληθυσμού, υπόδουλο έθνος μοιρασμένο από τους αποικιοκράτες στις ψευτο-χώρες Αβησσυνία και Κένυα): ” I am Greek citizen of Turkish origin; my father, my mother and my grandparents were all born in the Ottoman Empire. During my childhood, I became familiar with a trilingual phenomenon – Turkish at home, Greek in the streets, and French in school. I belong to a family that had Muslim and Christian members who did not have difficulty in changing their faith while preserving their deepest cultural personality intact – an uncle to my father, named Murad, fought against the British at Basra in 1916, but easily became Christian, and was renamed as Evdokimos when the family decided to move to Greece 14 years later! I belong to a family of merchants – my paternal grandfather was a big sugar merchant from Caesarea of Cappadocia, and later owner of a Brokerage and Securities company at the Athens Stock Exchange. I belong to two families, I mean paternal and maternal, whose members were familiar with extensive travels throughout the Middle East, the Balkans, the Caucasus area, and Central Asia at the end of the 19th and in the early 20th centuries. They were the first to describe to me, when a child at Athens – Greece, all the marvels of the Orient, the pyramids of Egypt, the zikkurat of Ur in southern Mesopotamia, the great palaces of Assurbanipal at Nineveh, nearby Mosul, the ruins of Persepolis, the great Phoenician temple of Baalbek, the majestic Islamic sites of Najaf – Iraq, Shiraz, Esfahan, Samarkand, Damascus, Jerusalem, and Cairo, the wilderness of Baluchistan, the magic coasts of the Red Sea, and of course what was home to them, the majestic and bewitching cities of Anatolia, Caesarea, Castamone, Sebastea, Konya, Malatya, Urfa, Erzerum, Diyarbakir, and of course Istanbul. My mother’s family had a maritime vocation, moving from Izmir/Smyrna in the Western coast of Turkey to the Aegean Sea islands of Cassos and Carpathos, before settling at Athens. It was only normal consequence that before 10 I knew in three languages the real meaning of terms such as ‘Hieroglyphic’ and ‘Cuneiform’ scriptures. And it was only normal for me to accept that ‘borders’ mean nothing to anybody – except the rulers, of course – and that the best way for anyone to see things is to go to the other side of the ‘border’, and see things from there as well!”

http://www.voicefinfinne.org/English/Interviews/Interview_Mega1.htm

Προσέξτε ότι θείος του πατέρα του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη ήταν μουσουλμάνος αξιωματικός του οθωμανικού στρατού και πολέμησε τους Άγγλους στη Βασόρα και την Βαγδάτη! Και 14 χρόνια αργότερα, για να ακολουθήσει την οικογένεια του αδερφού του έγινε χριστιανός ορθόδοξος κι άλλαξε το όνομά του από Μουράτ σε Ευδόκιμος.

Θα βρείτε ολόκληρη την συνέντευξη αναδημοσιευμένη εδώ:

https://www.academia.edu/23432753/Voice_Finfinne_Organization_-_Interview_with_Professor_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis_on_the_Oromos_Ethiopia_Sudan_Abyssinia_and_East_Africa

Μιλώντας σε μένα για το παρελθόν της οικογένειάς του, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης μου είχε χαρακτηριστικά πει: “ήμασταν πάντοτε μία οικογένεια ανάμεσα σε δύο κόσμους”. Αλλά αυτό ήταν μόνον το παρελθόν. Ένα παρελθόν που συμπληρώνεται από την αμειγώς χριστιανική οικογένεια της μητέρας του που είχε γεννηθεί στη Σμύρνη, όπως και η μητέρα της, ενώ ο εκ της μητρός παππούς του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη είχε γεννηθεί στο Κιρκαγάτς του Αξαρίου (Άκ Χισάρ) δηλαδή τα Θυάτειρα. Αυτό το τμήμα της οικογένειας του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη έζησε την μικρασιατική καταστροφή και την πυρπόληση της Σμύρνης. Εγγονή ιερέα, του παπα-Μάρκου Πλυτά που είχε ιερουργήσει στην Σμύρνη, την Κάσο και την Κάρπαθο, η μητέρα του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη ήταν μία βαθειά θρησκευόμενη χριστιανή.

Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης μετά τις σπουδές του στην Φιλοσοφική Αθηνών (1974-1978) φοίτησε σε μεταπτυχιακό επίπεδο στη Γαλλία (1978-1981), την Αγγλία (1981-1982), και το Βέλγιο (1983-1984) και ειδικεύθηκε σε 4 διαφορετικούς κλάδους ανατολιστικών επιστημών (ιστορία, ιστορία θρησκειών, αρχαιολογία), δηλ. ασσυριολογία, αιγυπτιολογία, χιττιτολογία και ιρανολογία, και σε πολιτικές επιστήμες (σοβιετολογία), παίρνοντας πολλά μεταπτυχιακά διπλώματα. Παράλληλα παρακολούθησε σεμινάρια σε φοινικικά, βιβλικές επιστήμες, αραμαϊκά, αρχαία υεμενικά, γκεζ (αξωμικά αβησσυνικά), ανατολικούς χριστιανισμούς, γνώση και μανιχεϊσμό.

Μετά την πρώτη συνάντησή μου μαζί του, όταν κύτταξα το βιογραφικό του στο σημείο σχετικά με τα μεταπτυχιακά του μου έκανε εντύπωση πόσο πολλά σεμινάρια και διαφορετικούς τομείς είχε παρακολουθήσει (λεπτομέρειες: https://www.academia.edu/34760195/1_Curriculum_August_2017_-_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis) και τον ερώτησα σχετικά. Μου είχε απαντήσει ότι επί τρία χρόνια στο Παρίσι, ‘παρακολουθούσε μόνον’ 60-65 ώρες μαθήματα και σεμινάρια την εβδομάδα. Σκεφθείτε το επιπλέον διάβασμα! Στο σύνδεσμο θα βρείτε και ονόματα καθηγητών του ανά χώρα.

Στη συνέχεια, το 1984 άρχισε την ετοιμασία της διδακτορικής διατριβής του στη Γερμανία, σπουδάζοντας παράλληλα σε Συρία, Ισραήλ, Ιράκ, Ανατολική Τουρκία, και Ιράν, μελετώντας τους εκεί αρχαιολογικούς χώρους, και επίσης δημοσιεύοντας δημοσιογραφικού επιπέδου άρθρα.

Οπότε, την διαφορά έκανε στην αρχή η βαθειά ιστορικο-θρησκευτική μελέτη του. Όταν κάποιος διαβάζει στο ασσυροβαβυλωνιακό πρωτότυπο το Ενούμα Ελίς (που ως Γένεση είναι ποσοτικά εκτενέστερη και ποιοτικά ανώτερη περιγραφή της αντίστοιχης βιβλικής) και περνάει διαγωνισμούς σε ιερογλυφικά κείμενα – αιγυπτιακούς μονοθεϊστκούς ύμνους του Αχενατόν (των οποίων αυτούσια μετάφραση στα αρχαία εβραϊκά είναι πολλοί ψαλμοί της Βίβλου), όταν κάποιος σπουδάζει ισιακές λατρείες, μιθραϊσμό, και γνωστικισμούς, τότε βλέπει και την θρησκεία του Αρχαίου Ισραήλ και την Χριστιανωσύνη μέσα σε ένα ιστορικό πλαίσιο πολύ μεγαλύτερο αυτού που είναι γνωστό σε σημερινούς Ιουδαίους και Χριστιανούς. Σ’ αυτό προσθέστε και την ιστορική κριτική των πηγών της Χριστιανωσύνης και την μελέτη των ανατολικών χριστιανισμών, από τους οποίους ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης ήταν και είναι κοντύτερα στον νεστοριανισμό.

Οπότε, ήδη από το 1984, στα 28 του, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης είχε πάψει να είναι χριστιανός ορθόδοξος. Ο ίδιος μου έχει πει αλλά και αρκετά κείμενά του συνηγορούν στο γεγονός ότι έβλεπε πολλά σημεία της Ιστορίας και της Καταγωγής της Χριστιανωσύνης παράλληλα με τον Γάλλο ιστορικό θρησκειών και κορυφαίο ελεύθερο τέκτονα Robert Ambelain.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Ambelain

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Амбелен,_Робер

Προσέξτε πόσο μεγαλύτερο είναι το κείμενο της ρωσσικής wikipedia! (προσωπικά έχω μάθει ρωσσικά τα τελευταία 2-3 χρόνια επειδή ζούμε μαζί εδώ στην Κένυα με τους Ρώσσους -από το Καζακστάν- συνεταίρους μας). Εσείς μπορεί να μην ξέρετε ρωσσικά αλλά και μόνο η διαφορά μεγέθους του λήμματος για ένα μάλιστα ‘ξένο’ στη Ρωσσία επιστήμονα θα σας δείξει την ουσία του βάθους της διαφοράς που βλέπετε σε πολιτικο-οικονομικό επίπεδο ανάμεσα στην Γαλλία και τη Ρωσσία. Στη διάρκεια των μεταπτυχιακών του στο Παρίσι, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης μου έχει πει ότι είχε συναντηθεί και συζητήσει επί μακρόν και για πολλές φορές με τον Robert Ambelain.

Προσέξτε, φερ’ ειπείν, μια σειρά από εκλαϊκευτικά άρθρα του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη αρχικά δημοσιευμένα στη δεκαετία του 1990! Εδώ φαίνεται να ακολουθεί από κοντά σχετικά δημοσιεύσεις του Robert Ambelain:

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης – Οι Χριστιανισμοί Το Άγνωστο Παρασκήνιο της Δημιουργίας της “Νέας” Θρησκείας Οι Επισημασμένες Αντιφάσεις μεταξύ των Πηγών του Χριστιανισμού: Ευαγγέλια, Πράξεις, Επιστολές

(Και εδώ σε PDF: https://www.academia.edu/49282705/ΟιΧριστιανισμοίΤοΆγνωστοΠαρασκήνιοτηςΔημιουργίαςτηςΝέας_Θρησκείας_1)

Εδώ όμως είναι μια καθαρόαιμη ‘μεγαλομματική’ ιστορικο-θρησκευτική προσέγγιση:

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης – Οι Χριστιανισμοί Το Άγνωστο Παρασκήνιο της Δημιουργίας της “Νέας” Θρησκείας Οι Τέσσερις Ιουδαϊκές Τάσεις & τα Βασικά Θρησκευτικά Ρεύματα της Εποχής

(Και εδώ σε PDF: https://www.academia.edu/49285956/ΟιΧριστιανισμοίΤοΆγνωστοΠαρασκήνιοτηςΔημιουργίαςτηςΝέας_Θρησκείας_2)

Πολλές φορές πρέπει κάποιος να ξέρει να διαβάζει τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη σωστά. Εδώ δεν εξιστορεί (ούτε υπερασπίζεται) την θρησκευτική θέση των Αχμαντίγια (στο Πακιστάν δεν τους θεωρούν καν μουσουλμάνους αλλά οι ίδιοι πιστεύουν ότι είναι κι ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης τους υπερασπίζεται σε πολιτικό επίπεδο) περί τον Ιησού (ότι τάχα απεβίωσε στο Κασμίρ) αλλά την ιστορία της θέσης αυτής, δηλαδή πως αυτή προέκυψε ‘ξαφνικά κι από το πουθενά’ και ποια γεωστρατηγικά συμφέροντα εκπροσωπούσε:

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης Τα σκοτεινά χρόνια της ζωής του Ιησού. Τα ταξίδια του σε Περσία, Ινδία & Κασμίρ

(Και εδώ σε PDF: https://www.academia.edu/49291062/ΤαΣκοτεινάΧρόνιατηςΖωήςτουΙησούταΤαξίδιατουσεΠερσίαΙνδίακαιΚασμίρ_)

Και εδώ δίνει το όλο ιστορικό πλαίσιο των χρόνων του Ιησού από τα βρεταννικά νησιά (ρωμαϊκή επικράτεια) μέχρι την Ινδία:

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης – Από την Ιουδαία στο Κασμίρ

(Και εδώ σε PDF: https://www.academia.edu/49293803/ΑπότηνΙουδαίαστοΚασμίρ_From_Judaea_to_Kashmir)

Σου λέει δηλαδή ότι, ναι, είναι αληθοφανές (plausible) ότι ο Ιησούς θα μπορούσε να είχε πάει εύκολα στο Κασμίρ. Δεν ήταν ούτε ‘μακριά’ για τα τότε μέτρα, ούτε ‘επικίνδυνο’.

Οπότε, όπως μου έχει πει ο ίδιος, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης, με σχετική δήλωσή του, απέρριψε τον Χριστιανισμό το 1985 και απέκτησε μια νέα ταυτότητα όπου στην ένδειξη ‘θρήσκευμα’ έγραφε ‘άθρησκος’. Καταλαβαίνετε βέβαια ότι αυτό δεν έχει καμμία σχέση με αθεΐα.

Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Άθρησκος που αναζητάει να βρει μια θρησκεία

Το πιο ενδιαφέρον ωστόσο (σε μένα που δυστυχώς τον γνώρισα ‘πρόσφατα’, το 2011, και έκτοτε προσπαθώ να βρω και να διαβάσω άρθρα του δημοσιευμένα στα ελληνικά και σε άλλες γλώσσες στις δεκαετίες του 1980 και 1990) είναι ότι, από τότε που ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης γίνεται άθρησκος, στα άρθρα του είναι εμφανής (τουλάχιστον σε μένα, τώρα) μια προσπάθεια έρευνας, αναζήτησης και ταύτισης μιας πλέον χαμένης θρησκευτικότητας.

Κυττάξτε αυτό:

https://www.academia.edu/23010978/ΜουχάμαντΣαμσαντίνπρώηνΚοσμάςΜεγαλομμάτηςΟδοιπορικόστηνΠερσίατου_Ιμάμη

https://www.academia.edu/23010128/ΟδοιπορικόστηνΠερσίατουΙμάμητουΜουχάμαντΣαμσαντίνπρώηνΚοσμάΜεγαλομμάτη

Εδώ μπορείτε να το δείτε σε βίντεο (δύο συνέχειες) το οποίο ανέβασα επειδή μου άρεσε ιδιαίτερα:

http://www.youtube.com/    watch?v=wB2Ze1v_uA8

http://www.youtube.com/    watch?v=XCLjynFKcCU

Τα δύο βίντεο βρίσκονται εδώ:  

https://vk.com/video429864789_456239043

https://ok.ru/video/333170084440

και

https://vk.com/video429864789_456239044

https://ok.ru/video/333172181592

Αρχικά δημοσιευμένο το 1986, δείχνει ένα νεαρό άνθρωπο που ψάχνει στα πλαίσια του κόσμου στον οποίο ζει την αλήθεια και την πνευματικότητα σε παραμύθια ειπωμένα στο μακρινό χωριό, μακριά από τις μεγαλουπόλεις, την τεχνολογία, τον μοντερνισμό, και τον εκδυτικισμό. Ήταν ηλίθιο που μερικοί, όπως έμαθα από φίλους, τον θεώρησαν τότε φιλο-Ιρανό διαβάζοντας και παρερμηνεύοντας το άρθρο αυτό.

Ναι, υπάρχει αναφορά στην αυτοθυσία των πολεμιστών αλλά το όλο κείμενο περνάει φευγαλέα από τις μεγάλες πόλεις, επικεντρώνεται στα βουνά, τις παραδοσιακές αξίες, τη ζωή κοντά στη φύση, με τα ζώα, την αγροτική καλλιέργεια, τα δάση, παραδοσιακό ετήσιο κύκλο στη φύση, και καταλήγει στην απόλυτη απόρριψη κάθε νεωτερισμού των τελευταίων αιώνων.

Σε ένα βαθμό, το άρθρο αυτό ήταν και μια αντιπολίτευση στον Χομεϊνί της οικονομίας, της πολιτικής, της εξόρυξης υδρογονανθράκων, και του πολιτικοποιημένου σιιτικού ισλάμ που είναι – όπως λέει ο ίδιος ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης – μια υλιστική ψευτο-θρησκεία όπως κι όλες οι άλλες οι σημερινές που όλες τους είναι “πολύ μακριά από το τι είναι μια πραγματική θρησκεία, δηλαδή μια ψυχοσωματική ένωση και μια υπερβατική επικοινωνία με τον αληθινό κόσμο, τον ψυχικό κόσμο, χωρίς τις σκέψεις, τις θεωρίες και τις ιδεολογίες του υλιστικού περιβάλλοντός μας”.

Προσέξτε εδώ ένα 29χρονο επιστήμονα να επικεντρώνει τις αναζητήσεις του στην τοπογραφία του ….. ασσυροβαβυλωνιακού Κάτω Κόσμου με πολλά αιγυπτιακά, εβραϊκά κι αρχαιοελληνικά παράλληλα:

Τα Σπήλαια: Χθόνιος Χώρος στις Σημιτικές Αντιλήψεις

και https://www.academia.edu/23213198/ΤαΣπήλαιαΧθόνιοςΧώροςστιςΣημιτικέςΑντιλήψειςΤουκαθΜουχάμαντΣαμσαντίνπρώηνΚοσμά_Μεγαλομμάτη

Σημειώνω πάντως ότι στα χρόνια εκείνα, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης δεν πορεύθηκε σε ευθεία γραμμή προς το Ισλάμ. Ο ίδιος μας έχει πει ότι στο Ισραήλ (για μεταπτυχιακά, προετοιμασία διατριβής, και έρευνα – με υποτροφία του ισραηλινού κράτους) έκανε μπαρ μιτσβά (Bar Mitzvah), ενώ ο συγχρωτισμός του με τους Γιαζίντι βόρεια της Μοσούλης είχε περιέλαβε σαφώς και κάποια μύηση.

Διαβάστε τις σελίδες 104-110 από το βιβλίο του Έξι Άστρα της Ανατολής (στο τέλος του κεφαλαίου Άμιδα, δηλαδή σχετικά με το Ντιγιάρμπακιρ) όπου αρνείται ολότελα τις διαδόσεις μουσουλμάνων περί του σατανισμού ως θρησκείας των Γιεζιντί και θα καταλάβετε:

και (σε PDF)

https://www.academia.edu/49409404/ΆμιδαΝτιγιάρμπακιρΈξιΆστρατης_Ανατολής_Amida_Diyarbakir_The_Six_Stars_of_the_Orient

Οπότε, όντας για μία περίοδο 7-8 ετών άθρησκος, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης προσχώρησε στο Ισλάμ, προφέροντας στο σουνιτικό τζαμί του Καΐρου Αλ Άζχαρ τα γνωστά ‘λα ιλάχ ιλά Αλλάχ’ και ‘Μουχάμαντ αρ-ρασούλ Αλλάχ’.

Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης στα χρόνια των αναζητήσεων

Ντιγιάρμπακιρ (Άμιδα) 1984 – έξω από τα τείχη και με φόντο τον Τίγρη

Σαούρ, χωριό κοντά στην Μιντυάτ της επαρχίας Μάρντιν – 1985

Κοσμάς / Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Άθρησκος που ‘προσχωρεί’ στο Ισλάμ

Χαρράν – Κάρραι, Ούρφα (Έδεσσα Οσροηνής) 1994

Εσκί Σουματάρ, Ούρφα 1994

Ο ίδιος ορίζει στο σύντομο βιογραφικό του τα εξής: “Born Christian Orthodox, he adhered to Islam when 36, devoted to ideas of Muhyieldin Ibn al Arabi”.

https://independent.academia.edu/ShamsaddinMegalommatis

Τουρκία 1994

Εδώ πρέπει να σημειώσω προκαταρκτικά ότι ο Μοχυιεντίν Ιμπν Άραμπι, ίσως ο πολυμαθέστερος μουσουλμάνος όλων των εποχών, ήταν ένας σπάνια ανατρεπτικός φιλόσοφος ο οποίος στη διαμάχη Φαραώ – Μωϋσή (θέμα κοινό σε εβραϊκή θρησκεία, Χριστιανωσύνη και Ισλάμ) υποστήριξε τον Φαραώ, λέγοντας ότι ήταν πιο σωστός από τον Μωϋσή κι ότι η Θεϊκή Παρουσία ήταν υπέρ αυτού!

Πνευματικός πατέρας του Τζελαλεντίν Ρούμι (ιδρυτή του τάγματος των Δερβίσηδων), ο Ιμπν Άραμπι υπήρξε ο κορυφαίος μύστης του Ισλάμ και στις Μεκκικές Ενοράσεις (Αλ Φουτουχάτ αλ Μακίγιε) – που είναι μόνιμος σύντροφος του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη (περισσότερο από το κοράνι) – περιγράφει ασύλληπτες ψυχικές εμπειρίες, μετακινήσεις του στον χρόνο, επικοινωνία με ψυχές παλαιοτέρων γενεών (προ του Αδάμ) και άλλα απερίγραπτα θέματα που η σημερινή παγκόσμια τυραννίδα έχει καταδικάσει τον περισσότερο κόσμο σε άγνοια και συνεπώς καθολική παραπληροφόρηση.

Εννοείται ότι ο Ιμπν Άραμπι είναι ‘κόκκινο πανί’ για τα τέρατα του πολιτικού Ισλάμ (Αδελφούς Μουσουλμάνους) και των Ουαχαμπιστών (‘σαλαφιστών’).

Αλλά ας αφήσουμε τον Ιμπν Άραμπι!

Θεραπειά (Ταραμπυά) Σταμπούλ 1995

Προσέξτε τα ρήματα! Η διαφορά από το convert στο adhere είναι χαοτική. Άλλο ‘μετατρέπομαι’ ή ‘προσηλυτίζομαι’ και άλλο ‘προσχωρώ’. Σαφώς πρόκειται για επιλογή θρησκείας εκ μέρους ενός αθρήσκου.

Αλλά δεν έχει να κάνει τίποτα με σύγχρονους σεΐχηδες και ιμάμηδες τους οποίους ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης θεωρεί αμόρφωτους ψευτο-μουσουλμάνους, όπως άλλωστε θεωρεί όλες τις σημερινές θρησκείες υλιστικά εκτρώματα που απομακρύνουν τον μέσο άνθρωπο από την εναργή αίσθηση της ψυχής του, την ένωση μαζί της, και την λειτουργία του ανθρώπου ως ψυχοσωματικής ενότητας ικανής να εννοεί, να αντιλαμβάνεται και να δρα σε υλικό και σε ψυχικό επίπεδο.

Πολύ καλός γνώστης των λατινικών, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης κάτι δηλώνει με την αποφυγή του cum- (convert) και την προτίμηση του ad- (adhere).

Τασουτζού (Taşucu), Μερσίνη 1996

Από τις μεταξύ μας συζητήσεις μπορώ να σε διαβεβαιώσω ότι ο ορισμός της Πίστης, τον οποίο δίνει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης, βρίσκεται στους αντίποδες του τι ο κόσμος νομίζει ως ‘πίστη’ σήμερα και ταυτίζεται απόλυτα με την σήμερα ξεχασμένη και παρανοημένη, πλην όμως απολύτως κυριολεκτική και σε φυσικό επίπεδο, πρόταση του Ιησού “ἐὰν ἔχητε πίστιν ὡς κόκκον σινάπεως, ἐρεῖτε τῷ ὄρει τούτῳ μετάβηθι ἐντεῦθεν ἐκεῖ, καὶ μεταβήσεται, καὶ οὐδὲν ἀδυνατήσει ὑμῖν” (Κατά Ματθαίον, ΙΖ’ 20).

Δηλαδή, δεν είναι η Πίστη μια απλή θεωρητική /ιδεολογική παραδοχή απόψεων, αφηγήσεων, γνωμών, θεωριών και αντιλήψεων του στυλ “εσύ πιστεύεις στον κομμουνισμό”, “εγώ πιστεύω στο ναζισμό”, “αυτός πιστεύει στον βουδισμό”, “αυτή πιστεύει στον μονισμό”, “αυτοί πιστεύουν στον υπαρξισμό” κι “αυτές πιστεύουν στον χριστιανισμό”, κοκ. Πίστη είναι κάτι άλλο. Μια λειτουργία του ψυχικού κόσμου.

Ναι, ερώτησα τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη, σε μια από τις πρώτες συναντήσεις μας, νομίζω εδώ στην Κένυα το 2012, γιατί έγινε μουσουλμάνος. Μου είπε ότι ποτέ δεν είχε γράψει ή πει σε κάποιον κάτι το σχετικό, ούτε και επρόκειτο, “επειδή η Πίστη είναι μια απολύτως προσωπική λειτουργία και πραγματική, δηλαδή ψυχική, επικοινωνία με τον Θεό, οπότε από τη φύση της δεν μπορεί να αφορά άλλους”.

Στη συνέχεια μου είπε ότι το να τον ρωτάω κάτι τέτοιο ήταν σχεδόν οξύμωρο επειδή, για να κατανοήσω μια ενδεχόμενη απάντησή του, θα έπρεπε να σπουδάσω και να μελετήσω όλα όσα εκείνος είχε μελετήσει, σπουδάσει και αντιληφθεί ως Χείρα Θεού μέσα στις λίγες χιλιετίες της Ανθρώπινης Ιστορίας.

Αλλοιώς θα ήταν σαν να του ζητήσω να μου μιλήσει σε ασσυροβαβυλωνιακά, μια γλώσσα στην οποία δεν κατέχω ούτε μία λέξη. Οπότε συμπεραίνω προσωπικά ότι η προσχώρησή του στο Ισλάμ, στο ιστορικό Ισλάμ των χρόνων της ακμής της Βαγδάτης και της Ανδαλουσίας και όχι στο σημερινό ψευτο-ισλάμ, ήταν συνάρτηση των ιστορικών, αρχαιολογικών, ιστορικο-θρησκευτικών ερευνών, μελετών και συμπερασμάτων του από την μία πλευρά και υπόθεση υπερβατικών ψυχικών αναζητήσεων από την άλλη.

Στην συνέχεια, τον ερώτησα αν θα μου συνιστούσε να γίνω και γω μουσουλμάνος και μου απάντησε ρητώς “ασφαλώς και όχι”. Συνέχισε λέγοντας ότι ο καθένας έχει τον δικό του δρόμο για την επικοινωνία και την συνένωση με τον Θεό και για την ολοκλήρωση της αποστολής του εδώ, και ότι δεν υπάρχει θρησκεία η οποία στο αρχικό της ή στο κορυφαίο της σημείο να μην είναι ικανή να οδηγήσει ένα άνθρωπο επιτυχώς στον απώτατο στόχο: το υπερπέραν (και βέβαια εννοείται ότι οι κατά τόπους πολυθεϊσμοί δεν αποτελούν ποτέ θρησκεία για τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη αλλά αλλοίωση και ξεπεσμό θρησκείας).

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Μουσουλμάνος που υπερασπίζεται τους Αραμαίους Χριστιανούς κι απαιτεί ανεξάρτητο αραμαϊκό χριστιανικό κράτος σε Συρία-Ιράκ

Στην αρχή της γνωριμίας μας, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης μου είχε δημιουργήσει μεγάλη περιέργεια επειδή ακριβώς δεν μπορούσα να τον εντάξω κάπου (κι αυτό ήταν αδύνατο) και επειδή σύντομη έστω συζήτηση μαζί του δείχνει ότι και ξέρει πολύ καλά και την Χριστιανωσύνη και το Ισλάμ και τις πρότερες και νυν θρησκείες της Ανατολής, και εύκολα βρίσκει συγγενή προς εκείνον άτομα, στοιχεία, θέσεις και εκφράσεις παντού.

Στην Χριστιανωσύνη έλκουν τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη πολύ διαφορετικά μεταξύ τους πρόσωπα και ρεύματα. Αλλά μόνον εκείνος θα μπορούσε να εξηγήσει πως συνδυάζει τον Ιωάννη Χρυσόστομο με τον Ιερό Αυγουστίνο, τον Εφραίμ Σύρο με τον Νεστόριο, τον Μιχαήλ Ψελλό και τον Κοσμά Ινδικοπλεύστη. Και ασφαλώς θα είναι ο μόνος μουσουλμάνος με μεγάλη εκτίμηση για τον Ιωάννη Δαμασκηνό, από τον οποίο ωστόσο θεωρεί ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης ολόκληρη την σημερινή Ορθόδοξη εκκλησία ως απομακρυσμένη και συνεπώς ως αλλοιωμένη.

Και βέβαια, ακριβώς επειδή ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης (κι επανέρχομαι στην ίδια την ερώτησή σας) δεν ‘απέρριψε την Χριστιανωσύνη για ν’ αποδεχθεί το Ισλάμ’, δεν υπάρχει στον ίδιο κανένα είδος αντίθεσης ή αντιπαράθεσης με την Χριστιανωσύνη. Όταν κάποτε τον είχα ρωτήσει ποιος είναι πιο κοντά στον Θεό, ένας μέσος χριστιανός ή ένας μέσος μουσουλμάνος, μου είχε πει ότι ο πιο κοντινός στον Θεό είναι …. ὁ ποιῶν τὸ θέλημα τοῦ πατρός τοῦ ἐν οὐρανοῖς.

Και όταν τον ερώτησα, αν πιστεύει ότι οι θεωρητικοί στυλοβάτες του Ισλάμ είναι πιο ορθοί από τους αντίστοιχους της Χριστιανωσύνης και ότι το Ισλάμ είναι περισσότερο μονοθεϊστική θρησκεία από την Χριστιανωσύνη, τότε μου είπε ότι εξετάζω τις θρησκείες πολύ επιφανειακά και ότι αυτό οδηγεί πάντοτε σε λάθη, και όταν ζήτησα περισσότερες εξηγήσεις, μου έκανε την εξής ερώτηση:

– Κατά πόσον μια θρησκεία με πιο ορθούς θεωρητικούς στυλοβάτες και περισσότερο μονοθεϊστική από μιαν άλλη είναι καλύτερη από την άλλη, αν της άλλης θρησκείας οι οπαδοί είναι πιο ηθικά, πιο ευσεβή και πιο κοντινά στον Θεό άτομα;

Κάϊρο 2002

Και αυτό νομίζω δίνει και την ταυτότητα του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη που βλέπει συνέχεια στο τι υπάρχει πίσω από τις θρησκείες-συστήματα και κηρύγματα. Γι’ αυτό άλλωστε και ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης συστηματικά και με εκτεταμένη αρθρογραφία ζήτησε από το 2004 και το 2005 την ίδρυση αραμαϊκού χριστιανικού κράτους στον χώρο του Ιράκ και της Συρίας, και ολόθερμα υπερασπίστηκε τους Αραμαίους Μονοφυσίτες (Ενοφυσίτες) και Νεστοριανούς και τους Κόπτες της Αιγύπτου. Αυτούς για τους οποίους ψευτο-πατριάρχες, ψευτο-μητροπολίτες και ψευτο-χριστιανοί δεν έχουν πει ούτε λέξη!

Αλεξάνδρεια 2003

Γι’ αυτό και η μεγάλη αραμαϊκή οργάνωση Αράμ Ναχρίν (‘Αραμαϊκή Μεσοποταμία’) τον τιμάει και τον υπερασπίζεται, επειδή οι αλήθειες τις οποίες αποκαλύπτει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης καταστρέφουν αποικιοκρατικά έργα, ατιμίες, εγκλήματα και γενοκτονίες αιώνων:

http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Iraq.htm

http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Insults_Assyrian_Terrorists_27_6_2007.htm

Αλεξάνδρεια 2006 με την Ευρωπαία Επίτροπο Benita Ferrero–Waldner και τον Αιγύπτιο υπουργό Εξωτερικών Άχμεντ Αμπού ‘λ Γέϊτ (Ahmed Aboul Gheit)

Και συμφωνούν μαζί του ότι τίποτα δεν βαραίνει την Οθωμανική Αυτοκρατορία, το Σαφεβιδικό / Κατζάρ Ιράν ή την σύγχρονη Τουρκία και ότι για όλα τα εγκλήματα στην ευρύτερη περιοχή οι μόνοι ένοχοι είναι η Γαλλία, η Αγγλία, κι η Αμερική. Αναδημοσιεύουν δε σωρεία άρθρων του στα αγγλικά και μεταφράζουν πολλά από αυτά στα ολλανδικά (επειδή υπάρχει μεγάλη συρο-λιβανο-ιρακο-ιρανο-τουρκική αραμαϊκή χριστιανική κονότητα στην Ολλανδία), και εδώ είναι κατάλογοι:

http://www.aramnaharaim.org/English/opinion_analyse.htm

http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Issue_Iraq.htm

Αμπού Δάμπι 2012

Αναφορές θα δείτε και εδώ:

http://www.aramnaharaim.org/English/ (κεντρική κολώνα)

http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/index_en.htm (κάτω δεξιά)

Μογκαντίσου 2013 – στα δεξιά, μαζί με συναδέλφους του Σομαλούς σε εκδήλωση του πανεπιστημίου στο οποίο εργαζόταν ως μόνος ευρωπαϊκής καταγωγής καθηγητής σε όλη την Σομαλία

(στα αριστερά)

Στους δρόμους του Μογκαντίσου 2013 – σε αυθόρμητη πολιτική εκδήλωση οπαδών του μόλις τότε απελθόντος προέδρου Σεΐχ Σερίφ Σεΐχ Άχμεντ τον οποίο ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης είχε συστηματικά υποστηρίξει από το 2007, όπως στα εξής άρθρα:

http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewarticle.asp?id=58660

και

https://pemot5.blogspot.com/2011/05/geeska-africa-somalia-ogaden-oromia.html

Μογκαντίσου 2013 – με Σομαλούς φοιτητές του στην παραλία Λίντο

Σημειωτέον ότι ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης είχε υπερασπιστεί τον Πάπα Βενέδικτο ΙΣΤ’ ενάντια στις κατηγορίες που είχαν εκφράσει μουσουλμάνοι εναντίον του το 2006. Ενδεικτικά:

https://www.academia.edu/24775355/Benedictus_XVI_may_not_be_right_but_todays_Muslims_are_islamically_wrong_By_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/24778178/Lord_Carey_Benedictus_XVI_and_todays_decayed_Islam_-_Prof._Dr._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/24779064/What_Benedict_XVI_should_say_admonishing_Muslim_Ambassadors_-_by_Prof._Dr._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/24779960/Can_Benedict_XVI_bring_Peace_and_Concord_-_by_Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

Επίσης:

https://www.academia.edu/25317295/Benedict_XVI_between_Constantinople_and_Istanbul_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/25317609/Benedictus_XVI_between_Istanbul_and_Nova_Roma_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Μουσουλμάνος που δίνει προτεραιότητα στην Ουακεφάνα, παραδοσιακή θρησκεία των Ορόμο, κι όχι στους Ορόμο Μουσουλμάνους

Επίσης, μια χαρακτηριστική προσέγγιση του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη σε κοινωνικά – πολιτιστικά θέματα και καταστάσεις των Ορόμο, ενός μεγάλου (45 εκ. πληθυσμός) και ιστορικού κουσιτικού αφρικανικού έθνους ακόμη υπόδουλου στην Αβησσυνία και την Κένυα, δείχνει πολλά.

Οι Ορόμο σήμερα έχουν ένα είδος τριχοτόμησης. Είναι το μόνο έθνος στον κόσμο που, παρά το όμαιμον και το ομόγλωσσον και το μεγάλο παρελθόν του, πιστεύει σε τρεις διαφορετικές θρησκείες: την Ουακεφάνα (παραδοσιακή, μονοθεϊστική θρησκεία των Ορόμο για την οποία έχει συγγράψει αρκετά ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης βρίσκοντας πολλά παράλληλα με αρχαία αιγυπτιακά μονοθεϊστικά δόγματα), το Ισλάμ, και τη Χριστιανωσύνη.

Αν μάλιστα προσέξουμε ότι και οι Χριστιανοί Ορόμο είναι διαιρεμένοι σε προτεστάντες και καθολικούς (που δέχθηκαν τα κηρύγματα δυτικών ιεραποστόλων), καθώς και σε μονοφυσίτες (στους οποίους επιβλήθηκε μια κοπτική αίρεση ως θρησκεία κατά την κατάληψη των Ορόμο βασιλείων από τους Αμ(χ)άρα κατά το δεύτερο μισό του 19ου αιώνα), καταλαβαίνουμε ότι η ‘τριχοτόμηση’ είναι στην ουσία θρησκευτική κατάτμηση.

Όμως και η Χριστιανωσύνη και το Ισλάμ μόνον πρόσφατα διαδόθηκαν ανάμεσα στους Ορόμο: τα τελευταία 150-170 χρόνια.

Όταν οι Αμ(χ)άρα κατκατητές προσπαθούσαν να επιβάλουν την κοπτική αίρεση που πιστεύουν, πολλοί Ορόμο, γνωρίζοντας το αντι-ισλαμικό μένος της αμ(χ)αρικής εξουσίας, από αντίδραση έγιναν μουσουλμάνοι καθώς γειτνίαζαν με τους Ογκαντένι Σομαλούς, παραδοσιακούς μουσουλμάνους για πάνω από μία χιλιετία.

Κάϊρο 2014 σε εκδήλωση Ορόμο προσφύγων, βασικός ομιλητής ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης περιγράφει το κουσιτικό – μεροϊτικό παρελθόν των Ορόμο και φοράει τη μπλούζα με τα σύμβολα του Oromo Liberation Front και τον χάρτη της Ανεξάρτητης Ορομία που θα αποσχισθεί από την Αβησσυνία παίρνοντας επίσης εκτάσεις της Κένυας.

Πάνω σε όλο αυτό το υπόστρωμα, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης (που έχει γράψει εκατοντάδες άρθρα για την Ιστορία, τον πολιτισμό και την ανεξαρτησία των Ορόμο τα οποία αναδημοσιεύουν πολλά Ορόμο πόρταλς, ακόμη και των  εξόριστων στην Ευρώπη Ορόμο κοινοβουλευτικών), αν και μουσουλμάνος, δίνει προβάδισμα στην Ουακεφάνα, θεωρώντας την ως πιο αυθεντική έκφραση της Ορομούμα (Ορομό-τητας) του μεγάλου έθνους. Ενδεικτικά:

Oromo Action Plan for the Liberation of Oromia and the Destruction of Abyssinia (Fake Ethiopia)

http://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/English/News_Archive/Oromo%20Action%20Plan%20for%20the%20Liberation%20of%20Oromia.htm

(https://www.academia.edu/35060233/Oromo_Action_Plan_for_the_Liberation_of_Oromia_and_the_Destruction_of_Abyssinia_Fake_Ethiopia_-_2010)

For the Oromos, it´s Now or Never!

http://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/Dhaamsa_bara_haaraa/For%20the%20Oromos,%20it’s%20Now%20or%20Never.htm

(https://www.academia.edu/35056747/For_the_Oromos_it_s_Now_or_Never_2010_)

Kushitic Oromos’ Ancestry in Ethiopia (: Ancient Sudan) vs. Semitic Amharas’ & Tigrays’ (Abyssinians’) Ancestry in Yemen

http://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/English/Facts%20about%20Oromo/Muhammad%20Shamsaddin%20Megamlommatis.htm

(https://www.academia.edu/34046949/Kushitic_Oromos_Ancestry_in_Ethiopia_Ancient_Sudan_and_Semitic_Amharas_and_Tigrays_Abyssinians_Ancestry_in_Yemen)

THE TRUE ETHIOPIA IS SUDAN & THE OROMO NATION, NOT ABYSSINIA

http://www.oromoparliamentarians.org/English/Facts%20about%20Oromo/Oromo-%20Kush.htm

(https://ar-ar.facebook.com/pg/Gadaa-Getachew-Jigi-1658210391147316/posts/?ref=page_internal

και

https://www.academia.edu/34046949/Kushitic_Oromos_Ancestry_in_Ethiopia_Ancient_Sudan_and_Semitic_Amharas_and_Tigrays_Abyssinians_Ancestry_in_Yemen)

Επίσης:

https://www.academia.edu/35057013/The_Astral_Voyage_to_Sublime_Finfinne

Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης: ένας Μουσουλμάνος ικανός για θρησκευτική και ιστορική αυτοκριτική

Αν τα παραπάνω δεν είναι αρκετά, θα πρέπει να προσθέσω και τα υπόλοιπα. Σε μία ερώτησή μου αν το κοράνι είναι το τελικό βιβλίο της Θείας Αποκάλυψης, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης μου απάντησε αυτόματα:

– Μα αυτό δεν το δεχόταν ούτε ο Γαζάλι, ο οποίος αν και πολέμησε την Μουτάζιλα, απέτυχε να αποδείξει ότι το Κοράνιο είναι αδημιούργητο και σύναρχο με τον Θεό. Οπότε, κατέληξε ότι στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου θα υπάρχει μια πιο ολοκληρωμένη, μία πληρέστερη αποκάλυψη του Θείου.

Κάϊρο 2016

Έτσι, προχωρώντας σε μουταζιλικές θέσεις, ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης συνέχισε παραβάλλοντας την αναμενόμενη από αρκετούς μουσουλμάνους φιλοσόφους έσχατη αποκάλυψη κατά το Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου με την αναφορά του Ιησού στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου, κατά το οποίο – μόνον – καὶ κηρυχθήσεται τοῦτο τὸ εὐαγγέλιον τῆς βασιλείας ἐν ὅλῃ τῇ οἰκουμένῃ εἰς μαρτύριον πᾶσι τοῖς ἔθνεσι, καὶ τότε ἥξει τὸ τέλος (κατά Ματθαίον, ΚΔ’ 14).

Αυτή η πρόταση του Ιησού, εμφανώς τοποθετημένη μέσα σε πλαίσια αναφορών στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου, δείχνει ότι δεν κηρύχθηκαν από την επίσημη χριστιανική εκκλησία όλα όσα εκείνος έλεγε και ότι αυτά θα κηρυχθούν για πρώτη φορά τότε, φέρνοντας μάλιστα το τέλος.

Την Έσχατη Αποκάλυψη, την οποία περιμένουν μετά το Κοράνιο, στο Πλήρωμα του Χρόνου, ορισμένοι μουσουλμάνοι φιλόσοφοι των χρόνων της ακμής του Ισλάμ, και στην οποία αναφέρθηκε ο Ιησούς, ταυτίζει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης με την αναφορά στο δέκατο κεφάλαιο της Αποκάλυψης σε ένα ‘βιβλιδάριο’: “Καὶ ἡ φωνὴ ἣν ἤκουσα ἐκ τοῦ οὐρανοῦ, πάλιν λαλοῦσα μετ᾿ ἐμοῦ καὶ λέγουσα· ὕπαγε λάβε τὸ βιβλιδάριον τὸ ἀνεῳγμένον ἐν τῇ χειρὶ τοῦ ἀγγέλου τοῦ ἑστῶτος ἐπὶ τῆς θαλάσσης καὶ ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς. καὶ ἀπῆλθα πρὸς τὸν ἄγγελον, λέγων αὐτῷ δοῦναί μοι τὸ βιβλιδάριον. καὶ λέγει μοι· λάβε καὶ κατάφαγε αὐτό, καὶ πικρανεῖ σου τὴν κοιλίαν, ἀλλ᾿ ἐν τῷ στόματί σου ἔσται γλυκὺ ὡς μέλι. καὶ ἔλαβον τὸ βιβλίον ἐκ τῆς χειρὸς τοῦ ἀγγέλου καὶ κατέφαγον αὐτό, καὶ ἦν ἐν τῷ στόματί μου ὡς μέλι γλυκύ· καὶ ὅτε ἔφαγον αὐτό, ἐπικράνθη ἡ κοιλία μου”. (Αποκάλυψη, Ι’ 8-10)

Η μουσουλμανική ταυτότητα του κ.Μεγαλομμάτη είναι λοιπόν σε έντονη αντιπαράθεση με τις πολιτικο-κοινωνικές εκφάνσεις του σημερινού “Ισλάμ των μεγαλουπόλεων”, όπως το αποκαλεί (αναφερόμενος είτε σε ουαχαμπιστές / ‘σαλαφιστές’, είτε στο ‘πολιτικό Ισλάμ’ / Αδελφούς Μουσουλμάνους).

Κι επισύρει έντονη αυτοκριτική η οποία προξενεί διπλή αντίδραση: οι μεν παραδοσιακοί μουσουλμάνοι που ζουν μακριά από αστικά κέντρα και μεγαλουπόλεις, εκείνοι που δεν καταδέχονται να ασχοληθούν με την πολιτική και την ευτέλειά τη, εκείνοι που περνούν τη ζωή τους χωρίς σύγχρονη τεχνολογία και χωρίς εκδυτικισμό στην καθημερινότητά τους, τον αποδέχονται σχεδόν αυτόματα. Αντίθετα, μουσουλμάνοι που ζουν σε μεγαλουπόλεις συχνά εκφράζουν πρωτοφανή οργή εναντίον του και η έχθρα τους θυμίζει λύσσα.

Η διεισδυτική ματιά του κ. Μεγαλομμάτη στις ιστορικές πηγές τον βοήθησε να βγει έξω από το δυτικό αποικιοκρατικό ψέμμα αναφορικά με την πρώϊμη διάδοση του Ισλάμ. Αυτό το ψέμμα δημιουργεί τους πόλους μιας τεχνητής σύγκρουσης παγκοσμίων διαστάσεων: τους αμόρφωτους αντι-μουσουλμάνους δυτικούς μοντερνιστές και τους αγράμματους αντι-δυτικούς ψευτο-μουσουλμάνους και ψευτο-μοντερνιστές, δηλαδή δύο τεράστια σύνολα που έχουν και τα δύο απόλυτα απωλέσει την ταυτότητά τους και δει τον ‘άλλο’ μέσα από παραμορφωτικούς φακούς. Προσέξτε αυτά:

https://www.academia.edu/25491609/The_Aramaeans_rise_will_transfigure_the_Middle_Eastern_Chessboard_2005_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/25552905/Islam_the_Cultural_Aramaization_of_the_Arabs_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/25553198/Aramaeans_vs.Arabs_The_fight_between_Civilization_and_Barbarism_within_Islam-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/35195555/Modern_Arabic_the_Anglo-French_Tool_of_Islamic_Terrorism_Promotion_2006_

https://www.academia.edu/23699776/Pan-Arabism_the_inhuman_progenitor_of_Islamic_Terrorism_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/25606449/Syria_A_Non-Arabic_Aramaean_Country_Ruled_by_the_Pan-Arabist_Puppets_of_Zionism_and_Freemasonry

https://www.academia.edu/24440473/Syria_Assad_US_Turkey_and_the_Concealed_Reality_the_Aramaean_Identity_of_Syria_-_By_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

Και κυρίως:

https://www.academia.edu/24440061/Arab_Nation_Hoax_Geared_to_Falsify_Islamic_History_Ruin_Varied_Nations_disfiguratively_Named_Arab_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

Κυττάξτε λοιπόν πως ο μουσουλμάνος κ. Μεγαλομμάτης ολότελα απορρίπτει την σημερινή πολιτικοποίηση και χρήση του χετζάμπ/νικάμπ ως ποταπή υποκρισία:

https://www.academia.edu/34460297/About_the_Islamic_Veil_and_the_related_False_Dilemma_and_World_Deception

Γυμνόστηθες, αναφέρει και αποδεικνύει, κυκλοφορούσαν οι μουσουλμάνες σε θερμά κλίματα πριν από 200 χρόνια και δεν υπήρχαν ούτε βιασμοί, ούτε πανσεξισμός, ούτε πορνεία!

Και στα ελληνικά σε δημοσιευμένη απάντηση σε Κερκυραίο παλιό αναγνώστη του στο Τρίτο Μάτι που συμπτωματικά συνάντησα εγώ στο ΥΤ κι έφερα σ’ επαφή με τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη: https://www.academia.edu/34450027/ΗσημερινήκατάστασητουΙσλάμκαισεποιουςοφείλεται

Το πιο τρομερό είναι το πως κατακρίνει τους περισσότερους μουσουλμάνους για την καθημερινότητα και την ψεύτικη, επίπλαστη λατρεία τους ως υποκριτές και ως στερούμενους κάθε πνευματικότητας υλιστές. Ψεύτικο το Ραμαζάνι και αισχρά τα απερίγραπτα τσιμπούσια μετά το ηλιοβασίλεμα, τονίζει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης.

Δεν γινόταν έτσι πριν από 1000 χρόνια το Ραμαζάνι. Δούλευαν κανονικά και νήστευαν. Σήμερα, δεν πάνε στη δουλειά τους και κοιμούνται ολημερίς για να ξυπνήσουν και να φάνε! Κι αυτή τη βρωμιά την αποκαλούν Ραμαζάνι και Ισλάμ.

Ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης πρώτα τους εγκαλεί να καταργήσουν το ψευτο-Ραμαζάνι τους και στη συνέχεια καταγγέλλει τους τυραννικούς ψευτο-μουσουλμάνους σεΐχηδες που θέλουν να σκαρτέψουν και να εκσατανίσουν όλους τους μουσουλμάνους υποχρεώνοντάς τους να υποκρίνονται και να ενεργούν έτσι όπως δεν επιθυμούν. Σε δυο συνέχειες:

https://www.academia.edu/25906093/Abolish_your_fake_Ramadhan_stupid_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

και https://www.academia.edu/26051016/Tyrannical_Ramadhan_as_part_of_Islamic_Terrorism_-_by_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

Ασουάν 2018

Όσο για την ισλαμική τρομοκρατία, διαβάστε την εκπληκτική τετραλογία για την τρομοκρατική επίθεση στις Βρυξέλλες (2016) όπου κάνει λόγο για ισλαμιστές τρομοκράτες στην Σταμπούλ του 1580! Κάτι που όλες οι αποικιοκρατικές χώρες, Γαλλία, Αγγλία κι Αμερική, γνωρίζουν πολύ καλά αλλά προσπαθούν να αποκρύψουν από τον μέσο άνθρωπο ανά τον κόσμο επειδή η γνώση της αλήθειας αυτής καταστρέφει τα απειλητικά κατά της ανθρωπότητας σχέδιά τους:

https://www.academia.edu/23602094/Brussels_Terror_Attack_Due_to_Western_Misperceptions_Part_I._By_Prof._Muhammad_Shamsaddin_Megalommatis

https://www.academia.edu/23641124/Brussels_Terror_Attack_Due_to_Western_Ignorance_of_Evil_Theological_Systems_-_Part_II

https://www.academia.edu/23685704/Brussels_Terror_Attack_Due_to_Western_Ignorance_of_the_Barbaric_Darkness_of_Ibn_Taimiyas_theological_system_-_Part_III

https://www.academia.edu/23706216/Brussels_Terror_Attack_Due_to_Western_Ignorance_of_the_Turning_Point_of_Islam_from_Civilization_to_Barbarism_Part_IV

“Δεν υπάρχει καταναγκασμός στην θρησκεία” είναι το ύπατο αξίωμα του Ισλάμ, ορίζει ο κ. Μεγαλομμάτης.

Κλείνοντας την εκτενή απάντηση θα πρότεινα να ρίξετε μια ματιά σε μια παλαιότερη αναφορά μου στον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη:

Ποιος είναι ο καθ. Μουχάμαντ Σαμσαντίν Μεγαλομμάτης;

https://greeksoftheorient.wordpress.com/2017/04/05/ποιος-είναι-ο-καθ-μουχάμαντ-σαμσαντίν/

(και πλέον: https://www.academia.edu/34415843/ΠοιοςείναιοκαθΜουχάμαντΣαμσαντίνΜεγαλομμάτης_)

Και για να κατανοήσετε τις υπερβατικές έρευνες, ασκήσεις και δραστηριότητες, στις οποίες μας έχει δείξει τον δρόμο, θα πρέπει ασφαλώς να προσέξετε αυτόν τον πίνακα κεφαλαίων και οδηγό υπερβατικών αναζητήσεων:

https://www.academia.edu/34399625/ΘεματολογίαΨυχικώνΕπιστημών_-_Seminars_in_Spiritual_Exercises_Handouts_in_Greek

Για ο,τιδήποτε περισσότερο, μπορείτε να επικοινωνήσετε με τον κ. Μεγαλομμάτη εδώ: megalommatis@inbox.ru & mshamsaddin@inbox.ru

Έχετε υπόψει όμως ότι από μεθαύριο θα βρίσκεται στο Σουδάν και σε πολύ απόμακρες κι υπανάπτυκτες επαρχίες, οπότε η επικοινωνία θα καθυστερεί διότι οι περιοχές εκείνες είναι εκτός δικτύων τηλεπικοινωνιών και χωρίς ηλεκτρισμό.