Re-reading Sherlock Holmes and it strikes me all over again that the main draw of this man is not his intelligence but his kindness and courteousness towards his distressed clients, most especially women. I was like ten when I read my Dad's copy of Adventures and so fascinated and attached to him immediately. It could never be replicated by modern interpretations, especially Moffat's Sherlock. *soul deep shudder* I hated the series from the get-go and couldn't figure out why until I saw that Tumblr post that pointed it out.
Also? Irene Adler's sexualisation is obviously gross and so much less progressive and agentive than the version this Victorian man wrote, but I'm also repulsed by the sexualisation of Sherlock Holmes. The man hasn't had a boner in his life. It's canon that he's never had any interest in women and his only close relationship with a man was Watson, and all power to slash fans, but there's absolutely nothing in canon that hints at anything but a friendship of, get this, mutual respect and admiration. This is the most aroace character in the English canon is what I'm saying, and the most generous interpretation of his relationship with Watson is a queerplatonic connection.
TL;DR: Perpetually flabbergasted how we got from a very gentlemanly, deeply compassionate, grown-ass adult who never talks down to Watson nor burdens anyone, to this entitled misogynistic manbaby with the social skills of a hornet.
Why is the Bull fandom so small?!
If you’re in the Bull fandom repost. I’m super curious.
I go 2+4= 6 so 60 8+8=16 so 7+8=15 60+15= 75
"I hope your god has asked for your mercy. I hope you have refused to forgive him" Instagram reel by stvksn
lifehack: when you see a Take One candy bowl in a restaurant, wait until noones looking and shovel candy into your pockets. god may judge you but his sins outnumber your own
Ohhh Yesss Merida (arrow aro XD). Also
9. Elsa from Frozen- aro
10. Luke Skywalker from Star Wars -ace
11. Ahri from League of Legends - ace
12. Tanjiro Kamado from Demon slayer - aro ace
13. James T. Kirk from Star Trek TOS- ace
14. Natasha Romanoff - ace
15. Sirius Black- aro
Reblog and add your headcanons!
16. Hercule Poirot - from Agatha Christie's novels and stories - AroAce
17. Miss Marple (Agatha Christie's novels) - AroAce
1. Sherlock Holmes from BBC Sherlock - ace
2. Frodo Baggins - ace
3. Bilbo Baggins - aro ace
4. Spencer Reid from criminal minds - ace
5.Jo March from little women - aro ace
6. Seto Kaiba from YughiOh - ace
7. Sandra Bell from For The People - aro ace (I know she kissed Ted in the end but still)
Why is no one talking about the fact that the scientist explicitly mentions what happens when you touch the bird and lick your finger afterwards? Like he has probably done this? He just went "Oh I've touched a poisonous bird. I wonder what happens when I lick the poison off my finger."?!
Dude has a death wish
"boringly abled" omg this is amazing
Things to start calling allistic people IMMEDIATELY:
people with allism
people suffering from allism
people trapped in allistic bodies
low-functioning allistics
the boringly abled
“he’s mostly normal, he’s just got a lick of the ‘lism”
I really don't like people touching me. A friend recently asked me to hug her because she was having a bad day and I was like ok. Can't be that bad right. Well, I had a panic attack... Now I remember why I don't like touching people. The strange thing is, I really like hugs and affection in theory. (I'm asexual by the way). In my daydreams and in my head in general I love hugs and cuddles, but if anyone in reality would just touch my shoulder I'd feel extremely uncomfortable. Does that make sense? Anyone else feel this way?
Ive made several sherlock holmes posts now so obviously i now have to talk about autism-
Im not an expert in autism for starters but i did discuss this with many people and it was one of the clearest scenes i remembered when judging Sherlock adaptations. I would dare to say Holmes's introduction is one of the most important scenes to his autism-coding, and that when adaptations fail to realize its importance, it also tends to reflect on how they code Holmes.
We hear about Holmes before we see him. The description of him is more than a bit negative and uncomfortable at this time, with Stamford being overcautious and warning Watson about Holmes's tempers. While i cant read this now without the pop culture knowledge of Holmes, I suppose it was to build up tension as to what sort of strange scientist he would be.
Yet when we meet Holmes, hes doing some chemical work. When he spots Watson and Stamford, he immediately runs over to them and excitedly shows them that hes made a chemical that detects hemoglobin. He only briefly brings up Watson's military career, just the barest hint to intrigue us.
He then starts rambling excitedly and passionately about how his chemicals work. He goes into the effect they have on his job, and criminal justice as a whole. Him infodumping about his passions is a fantastic introduction by the way, but some people skip it or place more focus on extending his deductions of Watsons life. This introduction does a lot to show how overall passionate he is about his work, and that it is what he cares to be speaking on (this is one of the rare times we see him out of case mode).
I think its worth it to note that while the scene is written with hints of Watson being overwhelmed, he seems willing to go along with whatever Holmes is saying. Basically, while he finds Holmes's demeanor odd, he still tries to engage positively and follow what Holmes is saying.
They also exchange things each other should know as roommates, both relatively cheerful and relaxed about it. Watsons behavior is what i consider also important for his characterization, but i am here to talk about Holmes (oh just you wait watson-)
The thing is, this introduction is one of the most humanizing depictions of Holmes. While he is talking about crime, this shows early on he has interests related to it that arent just "deduction." It is also a very active conversation from him! He infodumps incredibly excitedly, projecting more than he seems to normally, interrupting Watson several times, and forgoing social convention.
This can be seen in direct contrast to how Stamford introduces him, showing the humanity and passion behind what he described. It gives us an even broader view of Holmes from the get go.
Holmes's introduction codes him as autistic by showing what he looks like when *excited*
The fact the first thing we get to see of this character is his overwhelming care and passion for his work is not only important to his character, it should be the basis for his autism coding. He is excited! He gets overwhelmed with how he likes his work! He forgets not everyone else knows what he does! He wants to show, share, and explain it to everyone in good humor!
To me, that is something ive experienced with every autistic person ive known, and the details of it are so, so instrumental
also the horrible sensation of your nails being filed (don't know if that's the correct word)
(Add yours in the comments)
Pre-visit:
having to make a phone call to arrange an appointment
actually getting there on time
During visit:
having nothing in common with your servicer, so you just awkwardly spent the whole time in silence
your cuticles bleeding because they file too close to your sensitive skin
the burning sensation the first time your nails enter the UV lamp after gel application
not able to stim or fidget cause your hands are always occupied
Post visit:
that one nail that looks a little asymmetrical than the rest of the nails 🥲
Same in German. I mean for the original stories and adaptions set in Victorian England it would kind of make sense since even family members once addressed each other with the formal version of 'you', although I'm not sure if we hadn't moved past this already in the late 1800s. But for all modern adaptions, this translation makes absolutely no fucking sense. I mean come on, you can't tell me that BBC Sherlock and John who were on a FIRST NAME BASIS would have addressed each other with formal 'you' (Sie) instead of 'you' (Du) until John's wedding?! Elementary's translation is even worse in that way because Joan and Sherlock address each other with Sie (formal you) until the very last episode. I mean please, they tell each other that they love one another let them say "du" (normal/informal you)
Lowkey hate how in Russian Sherlock Holmes translations (and, by extension, in adaptations in Russian, and in, like, the whole cultural tradition in general) Holmes and Watson use formal "you" with each other. It's, like, a whole Thing, seen as a something emblematic of book canon. And it doesn't really make sense!!! Yes they use last names but that was just the normal etiquette at the time even with close friends, and it's not like you have nothing to extrapolate from in Russian, because people also mostly used last names here at the time, and they did very much combine it with the informal you with their friends! There's tons of examples??? It was absolutely the done thing! Whooooo decided to translate Holmes and Watson like that >:(((
Galaxy | she/her | autistic | ADHD | This is a place for my hyperfixations,They may change often, but I'll always be obsessed with murder mysteries
102 posts