Time for more Saiyan kids headcanons đ
Goten grows up to be a fucking behemoth and you cannot change my mind
Someone in the son family has to take some ox royalty genes đ€
Some extras for comparison đ€Ł I might do a personal height chart of db characters which is 100% canon and verified by Toriyama with absolutely no bias from me
Ekekek battle. (via ekekekkekkek)
I hatched a Psyduck with perfect IV today and named it Mob due to their resemblence! I guess you could call it..
Mob Psyduck 100
Modern howls moving castle but in ncy inspired by @jacarandatree post
reblog for something very lgbt to happen to you on nov 5th
I find it kind of funny that human babies are so fragile and helpless and useless that natural selection went like HARD-hard on humans finding babies cute. This thing is a wailing messy resource sinkhole so please find other reason to enjoy it. And the humans that did find baby cute and invest time in them, the crazy bastards?? Lived!!
And now thereâs so much spill-over from âbaby cuteâ gene that humans see literally any âbabyâ creature that even slightly resembles us, like
and weâre like đđ„°đ€©đ„șđ„șđ„ș I wanna love you so bad. I wanna make so many images of you, you are so small, just baby. Iâm inventing new emotions as we speak bc I love you so much.
Like, Iâm almost convinced humans didnât even domesticate dogs bc we thought theyâd be useful, we saw some puppies and it activated our Big Boi Primate Baby buttons, it wasnât even logic time baby, it was đ„ș time.
Weirdly anti-millennial articles have scraped the bottom of the barrel so hard that they are now two feet down into the topsoil
âWomen are told it is unfeminine and gross to have muscles and to cultivate strength, which in turn leads them to actively avoid doing things that will build muscles and strength, which then makes them even less capable of doing things that require strength, which the critics then use as proof of womenâs inherent physical frailty. And so the cycle continuesâŠâ
â
Womenâs difficulty with pull-ups is about more than biology | Fit and Feminist (via rememo)
And I always want to point out here: women, on average, possess more lower-body strength, while men, on average, possess more upper-body strength. Thereâs a lot of overlap and it isnât always individually applicable, but thatâs the generalization, averaging across the population.
But we SOCIALLY value upper-body strength, and upper-body muscles. So we construct women as weaker, because we refuse to measure them on the body parts where they may be stronger, we devalue those.
Lifting is mostly done with the legs. So women may be as good or better at heavy lifting as men. But we socially construct lifting as having to do with large, muscular arms and chests. You donât really need powerful arms and chests to liftâyou need powerful thighs, otherwise youâre gonna throw your back out. We actually lie about what makes a person strong and capable to favor men.
Push-up and pull-ups are upper-body strength exercises. So theyâre socially valued. The military doesnât tell you to do 20 squats as penance. No one is fucking impressed by all the squats you can do. Squats just sound stupid, hah, squats. We laugh at them because women might be better at them than men, on average. Theyâre worthless.
(via iknewiwouldregretthis)
This stuff plays into all sorts of other body image problems, too. The body weight thatâs regarded as ideal for women, for example, is really only achievable for individuals suffering from mild to moderate muscular atrophy. You literally canât get there just by shedding fat - you also have to let your muscles waste away. We actually regard it as ânormalâ for a woman to be suffering from muscular atrophy.
(via dancing-painted-bears)