*drinks Coffee And Returns To Factory Mode*

Maybe the real Neil Gaiman was the hashtags we found along the way.

Sometimes I doubt that you're the real neil gaiman

Sometimes I doubt that there is a real neil gaiman.

My lecturer: creates literally the worst PowerPoint I have ever seen in my life.

Also my lecturer, every 5 minutes: I'm so good at writing PowerPoints. I bet you're all so jealous of my PowerPoint writing skills.

Pack your bags and kiss your mother on the cheek, for not even God will survive the end of all things.

@wearewatcher I'd like to offer Mr Shane some vindication on this fine day.

All of us, the Seekers of Literary Knowledge, gathering on Tumblr.com: Mr Gaiman! Mr Gaiman! Look! We made a thing! Would you, our resident writing expert and trusted giver of creative advice, like to participate in our improvisatory storytelling project?

The Man, the Myth, the Legend: That is literally the worst thing I've ever seen in my life.

Neil Gaiman: I loved writing Good Omens collaboratively with Terry Pratchett. It added so much depth to the story and was really enjoyable. We had so much fun using "yes, and..." interactions to further the plot. I'd definitely recommend writing with friends to anyone looking to get into writing.

Tumblr: *Develops concepts to a movie collaboratively using "yes, and..." interactions to further the plot, making media analysis more accessible to people who don't have much experience and allowing people from drastically different fandoms to interact in a new and interesting way.*

Neil Gaiman: No, not like that.

I definitely think there's Something (TM) to say about the portrayal of "off-human" characters in modern media adaptations as having (particularly facial) deformities and/or learning disabilities.

Robert Louis Stevenson was fully like "this is my OC, Hyde, who represents the impact of a complete apathy toward your fellow man. There is nothing extraordinary about him except that his rancid vibes make people uncomfortable which adds to the core theme of the role of morality in humanity, so its really important that he's physically normal so the audience can recognise that it's what's inside that's most important," and every film adaptation was like "mmkay. Yeah, no, I've got it. We can show that he's evil by using prosthetics and making him non/semi-verbal, which, as we all know, are the True Measures of Evil."

a bunch of people are in my inbox rn asking me how to get a boring office job so here’s an answer

Neil Gaiman: I strongly encourage all of you to give writing a try! I loved writing Good Omens collaboratively with Terry Pratchett. It added so much depth to the story and was really enjoyable. We had so much fun using "yes, and..." interactions to further the plot. I'd definitely recommend writing with friends to anyone looking to get into writing.

Tumblr: *Develops concepts to a movie collaboratively using "yes, and..." interactions to further the plot, making media analysis more accessible to people who don't have much experience and allowing people from drastically different fandoms to interact in a new and interesting way.*

Neil Gaiman: No, not like that.

Goncharov Lore Thus Far, based on the top tumblr post results

Main cast are Goncharov himself, his wife Katya (née Michailov), and Andrey 

One side character is named Mario Ambrosini. He is described as a “sad boi” and is involved in gambling. 

Set in Naples and involving a drug ring/mafia. The plot seems to involve Russian organized crime attempting to get a foothold in Italy. 

There is a Boat Scene. Katya survives via resourcefulness. 

Andrey and Goncharov have a substantial amount of homoeroticism. Andrey also has an internet in Katya. This forms a true love triangle. 

At some point, Katya threatens to shoot Goncharov. This is framed as a Girlboss Moment. 

There is also a Beer Bottle Scene. 

Katya fakes her death.