Don't Really Know Anyone Here So No Tagging, But Definitely Reblogging. And Anyone Who Sees This Should

if you support donald trump unfollow me. full stop. hopefully no trump supporters are dumb enough to think they’re welcome here, but seriously. gtfo my page. block me while you’re at it.

things you don’t point out about people:

acne

cuts

Scars

body hair in places you’re not used to it being???

fat rolls/curves

how much/how little they’re eating

how skinny they are/what bones they can see because of how skinny they are

How fat they are.

If they have crooked or misaligned teeth maybe even yellowed

If they sweat a lot

don’t do it

don’t

Did I also cry when Scarlemagne died?

Also yes

Did I binge all of season 3 in one day?

Yes.

Am I proud of this decision?

Also yes.

Is Kipo and the Age of Wonderbeasts a top tier show that deserves all the attention and praise?

Once again, yes.

do you ever just see a youtube video and think "gee i wish this was made by one of My Youtubers(tm) so i could watch it comfortably" or are you neurotypical

Me, an intellectual: *goes into a long rant about Treasure Planet and why it is an amazing movie and why I enjoy its plot and messages and relationships based on my personal interests, experiences, and preferences in movies and things in general*

Also me, a simp: I just… Silver is amazing, guys…

➡️ Content warnings on fiction are a courtesy. 

➡️ Not every medium of fiction and storytelling has or is expected to have content warnings or extensive tagging.

➡️ Print novels do not traditionally warn for content in any way.

➡️ Until AO3 came along, fanfiction did not traditionally warn for content in any significant way.

➡️ An author is only obligated to warn for content to the degree mandated by the format they publish their fiction on.

➡️ Content warnings beyond the minimum are a courtesy, not an obligation.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is a valid tag that authors are allowed to use on AO3. It means there could be anything in there and you have accepted the risk. 'May contain peanuts!'

➡️ Writers are allowed to use 'Creator chose not to warn' for any reason, including to maintain surprise and avoid spoilers.

➡️ 'Creator chose not to warn' is not the same thing as 'no archive warnings apply'.

➡️ It is your responsibility to protect yourself and close a book, or hit the back button if you find something in fiction that you're reading that upsets you.

➡️ You are responsible for protecting yourself from fiction that causes you discomfort.

It's always so disappointing when plans don't work

me: *hyperfixating on fictional character for hours before bed* wow, I sure hope I’ll dream about them

my dreams: *spider monster chasing me downtown*

DTIYS for odd.loser_kun (insta). This is Hugo.

Hi! What do you dislike about the way Morgana is written in ToA?

Hello! Thank you for your question! Now I'll try to explain you what I dislike in ToA Morgana

Firsly, I have to say that I'm in love with Morgana from Trollhunters. She's literally queen of the darkness, her look is full of royalty and madness. But the way she was written in Wizards...... I just made a quick sketch about it

You see?? Morgana from Wizards feels like totally different character. If the only thing that I dislike in Trollhunters Morgana was her low level of magic power (btw even Angor Rot used more magic tricks in s1, but he is MUCH weaker than she), so in Wizards situation is very bad.

!! I have to say that I KNOW that Wizards should have got the second season and all the character bevelopment could be another, BUT!! I'M TALKING ABOUT THE FINAL PRODUCT THAT I SAW IN THE SERIES! THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION

Back to my words, Wizards gave us another Morgana. And I can't imagine how she turned from cute girl that wants to protect magical creatures to crazy bitch-ass woman that made an army of changelings IN A FEW DAYS. In this post I've written my own Morgana backstory in which from the start she have some mental issues and tendencies to violence.

Wizards Morgana feels strange. In this show she is a victim, but I don't feel any emotions about her tradegy. Why? Because I remember how she was acting in Trollhunters. Do you remember her villainous laugh when she deceived Angor Rot and took his soul? She told him to kill all Trollhunters but in Wizards she tries to save trolls. Umm, what? Okay, she also was doing cruel experiments on troll whelps (and obviously have stolen a lot of human children) to make changelings. Or the creepy moment when she first scares Claire and then takes control of her body to kill Jim? Oh, but she's actually a good girl, I assure you! She manipulates Strickler's feelings to achieve her goal and prevent Jim and Toby from getting out of the Shadow Realm, although he is almost her son.

Perhaps the problem was that the writers needed to introduce the Secret Orden into the plot for a future film, but it could have been done the same way with Morgana's old portrayal, although it would have made her a slightly weaker character. Anyway, making Morgana Secret Orden's champion would not changed her personality very much. Or just not that fast.

I cannot sympathize to a character who, on the one hand, wants to save magical creatures, and on the other, is ready to use any way to get her goal. Instead, I want to admire a strong female character who is willing to get her hands bloodied and wear the crown on her head.

Well, I think I'm done with that theme and thank you for your question!