Same.

That reminds me: Too bad he is basically dead for thirty years. Imagine if he only left for twenty, so he'd be back in 2020, absolute hell of a time

we need to talk about more, as a community, how fucking weird it is to see alucard using a cellphone

Colored in MS Paint

i have a small hyperfixation

so I got into grad school today with my shitty 2.8 gpa and the moral of the story is reblog those good luck posts for the love of god

just some face doodles: Angles! Shading! Character favoritism!

Bonus: the poses

New Character Ref for October 2022

got it done real quick, woo

Princess.

Alice Werebird AU, inspired by Peregrine Falcons

I have terrible news: Sweet Pete had a bottle of dip next to his eraser among his torture devices

I just finished watching the new Chip and Dale movie and i have several questions

Let's start with the basics, Roger Rabbit we see him at the beginning of the film when Dale tells his story, we don't see him again but that simple cameo is enough to spark some questions

1.- Is this the same universe as the 1988 film? 2.- Did the events of the film played out in the same way? 3.- Is the movie a movie in this new movie?

If we asume that both movies take place in the same universe we run into a problem, in Roger Rabbit it is said that toons cannot die, this being the reason why they make such dangerous stunts that would kill any human that tried it, however, in the new movie we see both titular characters afraid for their lives, if this was indeed the exact same universe, there would be no worries

Another alternative is that the events of who framed Roger Rabbit happened but in a slightly different way, in this new universe for example we wouldn't have the plot point of acid that can kill toons since you wouldn't need acid to do that

We could theorize that the movie is a movie inside a movie, intentionally confusing wording aside, what i'm saying is that in the new Chip and Dale movie universe, who framed Roger Rabbit would be just a regular crime movie.

Now if they are not in the same universe that doesn't mean that WFRB is a movie inside of a movie, it could simply be that Roger's career mentioned in his movie happened, just not the events of the movie, this could also be the case in alternatives 1 and 2, in the sense that Roger is known for his acting outside of the movie.

Now let's talk about everyone's favorite hedgehog, Ugly Sonic! when Chip and Dale ask for his help specifying that they need it fast Ugly Sonic says that going fast is Sonic's job, and that he's slow, this of course implies the existence of good looking Sonic, but exactly which Sonic?

There have been many Sonic shows, the adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, Sonic the Hedgehog (Series and Ova of the same name) Sonic Underground, Sonic X, Sonic Boom, in a near future Sonic Prime, and, of course, the Sonic Movie.

We know that the Sonic movieSonic surely exist since ugly Sonic does, but what about the others? if they all exist this brings a lot of interesting possibilities, for example, both Sonic SatAM (Saturday-AM) and the Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog aired at the same time, both starting in 1993 with AoStH ending 2 years after SatAM in 1996, the same year the Sonic OVA came out, the Sonics in the series are very similar so they could be the same cartoon in universe, but Sonic from the OVA looks different, with a design similar to Japanese Sonic art while the series use the Americanized design, having this 2 Sonics which would likely have very different personalities and stories considering how much Sega of America changed.

Regional difference aside, we are still left with at the very least 7 Sonics, and i say at the very list because this transitions into my next talking point: video game animation

What about video game Sonics? or video game cutscenes? are those also recorded the same way as cartoons?

Most video game cutscenes are animated with the game engine, and the animations are recreated in game, have you wondered why some of the cutscenes in your games look way nicer than the rest? because those were pre-animated and are played as a video, while the rest are made in game

Alternative 1: In game cutscenes don't exists as cartoons, pre made cutscenes do, under this, for example, we would get some extra Sonics from CD and Unleashes' intros for example, maybe some from the promotional Origins, Mania and Team Sonic Racing animations, and all other cutscenes

Alternative 2: Every character in a cutscene exists, not very likely in my eyes since this implies that the video game character themselves are alive, why am i even writing this it doesn't make sense?

Alternative 3: None of them do

This image from LA Noire is the best transition i have

The Uncanny Valley, feeling disturbed from seeing something that looks human, but something's off

In case you forgot we are talking about the Chip and Dale movie, halfway through the film we see the titular characters enter the uncanny valley, a place were every uncanny character from the early 2000's lives, but, they specifically mention they being sent there

Sent, very interesting wording, it implies that someone wanted to get rid of them, so they sent them to this isolated place, is this cartoon segregation? are other types of cartoons segregated? were 3D cartoons the victims of cartoon racism back in the day? could an uncanny civil rights movement happen? Why is racism giving me less material to talk about than Sonic? is my sleep depravation finally getting through?

The posible inequality of people and cartoons in the years before who framed roger rabbit and this movie could make for a great plot of Disney has the balls to do it

My word machine isn't working so no good written ending ok bye!

Neat

NINTENDO DIRECT JUST HAPPENED. IM SHOOK