Me when antis try to gaslight me into believing that darkshipping is harming me
A term for when you are a character through kinning, but you also ship yourself with them.
Alternatively, when you and your partner are both the same character through kinning.
This term is a cousin to Altercest(link).
This term is not for anyone against selfshipping or proshipping.
black & white and also the symbol below
"basic dni" do i get inside of the oven if i interact with you or not
how it feels enjoying anything when antis are around
Cookie run has so many lolis
â„ïž imagine your F/O whoâs almost decade older than you treating you like a child as a way to make you feel smaller.
â„ïžImagine them passively scolding you whenever you do something wrong. âNo, darling, we donât do thatâ as they grab you by chin and force you to look at them âMind your mannersâ âSay sorryâ
â„ïžImagine your F/O insisting on making every decision for you as âYouâre too young to know what you want. I know whatâs best for youâ
Proship friendly blog! Antis dni
Proship culture is making your s/i (self insert) younger or older to be in a pedophilic relationship with your f/o (fictional other)
â
âOMG there are so many proshippers in this fandomââ
Youâ DARE TO TRESPASS IN OUR TERRITORY AND COMPLAIN WHO LIVES HEREâïžâŒïžâïž
why does proselfship community loves this sm
aging your self insert down >>>>>>
Running back into the room with "AND ANOTHER THING"
In regards to the "not anti, not proship, but a third thing":
Many neutrals will openly interact with antis who are aggressive against pro-shippers, all in the name of "well, I don't care about the discourse, so I don't care that they're antis"
I need you to understand that the flaw with this is that it frames the anti mindset as an acceptable viewpoint to have. It isn't.
Imagine if I said "I don't care about the arguments between librarians and Moms For Liberty, and I think they just need to calm down. I support neither! Just stop fighting!" and then exchanged friendly emails with M4L members. This would be utterly ridiculous, wouldn't it? It would mean that I find their beliefs to be valid opinions to hold, and not dangerous rhetoric that, taken to its logical conclusion, would result in mass censorship.
This is even worse in the case of people who "used to be" pro-ship/pro-fiction, presumably knowing how bad this can get and how it affects people IN REAL LIFE, who still chose to go "neutral" and start interacting with antis. You know what they do, you know how they doxx and stalk and threaten people, and you know how they've caused a lot of mentally vulnerable people to take their own lives, and you're going to give them ANY kind of voice in fandom?
To be "neutral" tells me you don't give a single shit about the people who are being targeted over stupid fandom bullshit that was practically never an issue pre-2015. And the few times that it was... well, that's actually why AO3 exists now.
You want the discourse to stop? The only way that's going to happen at this point is if you snuff out as much interaction with fancops as possible. Avoid interacting with them directly as much as possible, do not reblog their posts or their art no matter how innocuous it is, do not allow them into your fandom spaces. Exclude them from fandom entirely, methodically ostracize them. Block, block, block, and block some more. Doing this will mean we only have to deal with the most extreme of cases that involve mass-brigading and block evading.
That's still a tall order of course, but I can guarantee you fandom spaces will improve in quality if you refuse to make a space for fancops at the table.
Sorry. I'm tired of pretending "neutrals" are anything other than Fancop-Lite.
call me eden/kair . 5teen . he / it / neos . proship/darkshipper . anti radqueer . latino esp/eng OK!
136 posts