That comic is an online goof, but there is an actual official DC comic about a communist Superman. It’s called Superman: Red Son, and it’s one of those Elseworld “what-if” comics DC used to put out on occasion in the 1990s.
The basic premise is that baby Superman’s capsule crashes in one of the less ravaged parts of the Ukraine in the 1930s instead of Kansas, so Superman grows up as an ardent Marxist-Leninist. After doing the superhero thing for a few years, he becomes Stalin’s successor as general secretary in the early 1950s and makes it his mission to make the world a better place. By the middle of the 1960s almost the entire world is united under technocratic socialism, and America is a decaying hermit kingdom wracked by civil unrest and rapidly sinking into geopolitical and historical irrelevance. (Sadly, America ends up winning in the end, because of course it does.) This comic has gotten a fair bit of praise over the years, probably more than it deserves. Still, I have a soft spot for it, if only for the fact that it was the first superhero comic I ever bought, and one of the few I didn’t get rid of later. For something a little grittier, I’d highly recommend looking for The Winter Men, an obscure noir crime story set most in late Yeltsin-era Moscow and dealing with the fate of a number of Soviet-era superhero programs.
The X-Files is interesting in this context, since even though Mulder and Scully are our heroes and we love them, they are still FBI agents, actual official representatives of the greater American monoculture who are tasked with going to the backwaters and forgotten places and dealing with the strange and deviant for the good of the whole. To their credit, the people writing The X-Files recognized this, and there’s plenty of episodes where they depict their monsters-of-the-week with some sympathy, or handle Mulder and Scully’s incursions with a note of ambivalence.
Old tv shows where the hero visits the 'town of the week' and identifies then solves a unique problem before moving on are so weird to watch now. "Route 66" to "Touched by an Angel" and etc. Any town in North America that still actually has a unique local culture wouldn't be receptive to an outsider pushing their nose into the local affairs.
Who even still thinks of turning to a pack of kind-hearted outlaws when the bank comes to foreclose on their orphanage?
I really like this design, even if it’s just the basic patrol escort hull profile kitbashed with TOS components. It’s a good design for a little putt-putt ship that does all the dirty work.
Pioneer-class, Star Trek: Online
Me too, Madiha, me too.
i feel like my tastes are so bizarre and inhuman that i can never share things with anyone or be part of a fandom without feeling like the biggest weirdo
My go-to source for the history of scientific romances is Brian Stableford’s 1985 book Scientific Romance in Britain 1890-1950. (While long out of print, this book is worth its weight in gold.) In Stableford’s account, scientific romances are very much the products of the environment they evolved from. Before the 1890s, publishing in Britain was divided into two rigid categories. On the “respectable” side were the great triple-decker novels, conservative in both style and content, and physically inaccessible to anyone who wasn’t wealthy or who didn’t have access to a circulating library. On the less reputable side were, of course, the penny dreadfuls; cheap to make, quick to read, easy to forget, and not that well-written. Scientific romances (and to a certain extent modern sf) tend to work best in the range between short stories, novellas, and single novels; long enough to properly extrapolate from a central idea, but not so long as to wear out their welcome. It was only at the end of the 19th century, with the decline of the triple-decker, the rise of a literate middle class, publications that catered to them, and of writers that could comfortably support themselves writing for this new audience, that scientific romances had the space and opportunity to emerge. Naturally, this was a different class of writers with different influences that those who had written the gothic works from earlier in the century, so scientific romances evolved in both style and content in a much different direction. (As an example, scientists in 19th-century Britain had a unique tradition of penning essays to explain their theories and their significance to a more general audience, a tendency that was absorbed wholeheartedly into the scientific romance, to the point that both scientists and novelists tried their hands at both essays and stories every so often.)
I was thinking about the literature of 1897 and it got me thinking about the Scientific Romances and how they differ from the Gothic Romances or Gothic Horrors of the age. Clearly, there is some overlap and Frankenstein (much earlier but still relevant) crosses those borders many time without showing a passport for either but by the late 19th you couldn't really compare say 'The War of the Worlds' to 'Dracula'. Where did they diverge so wildly? Or did they?
That’s a really good point, and I’m sorry I took so long to get to this question! Arguably, Frankenstein himself brings this up- he started out reading ancient mystic texts and moved to more scientific ones later- but I guess there started to be a clearer divide between what we’d call fantasy and what we’d call science fiction as science itself became better known. You could probably write gothic science fiction in the mode of Asimov, where the science is there to set up philosophical and psychological issues- I’d certainly read about the drama between robot heirs to their creators’ estate and legacy- but the divide certainly feels there. Returning to H. G. Welles, maybe The Invisible Man is the midpoint? Or maybe it’s when “scientist” became a common enough profession to not seem mysterious? Any followers with ideas on this subject, help me out here!
@coppermarigolds eeee! :D
I had to break in my new Surface Pro and make a quick shitty sketch of Kuvira as Iden Versio because how the shit has no one made the resemblance yet?
I mean they both fall in love with top notch dork ass engineers too what more do you want
Holy hell. I loved Beyond the Black Rainbow, and I’ve been waiting for years for Panos Cosmatos to be able to make another movie. And now he’s got one! With cults! And monsters! And Nicolas Cage!
PUT IT DIRECTLY IN MY VEINS.
Seriously though, this feels like the first time I heard metal that I really, really liked.
Picard: “...well, fuck me, I guess.”
The unnamed battlefield medic who shows up to evac downed units also made her debut in Skies of Arcadia as Fina, though according to her ingame bio she’s actually three people in VC1: the triplets Fina, Mina, and Gina Sellers.
Watching you play Valkyria Chronicles I saw some familiar faces - Vyse and Aika are main characters from Skies of Arcadia. Vyse is kind of a tool but Aika's my homegirl. In said game they fight against the Empress of Valua, and I noticed there's also a city called Valua mentioned in passing during your video.
Oh I thought I’d seen those characters somewhere! I think one of the main dudes behind ValCro had a hand in Skies of Arcadia (it was also published by Sega too if I remember correctly). That’s a neat little thing. Thank you!
Hello there! I'm nesterov81, and this tumblr is a dumping ground for my fandom stuff. Feel free to root through it and find something you like.
215 posts