we fucked up
Pretty big spoilers for Whitepine 4 and the ARG under the cut
So while watching the new episode, my friend and me came up with a few theories/thoughts and since figuring stuff out is a community effort, I thought I'd share them.
As my amazing, perceptive friend Bee ( @mossybee-exe ) pointed out, in this shot, while Ivory is walking back from the cabinet where she's supposed to find the cot, there is a pair of legs on the staircase.
You know who has black pants? THE DETECTIVE, who we later see in the manor.
That in itself is already kind of a theory, but I think this subtle detail makes sense for both explanations we've come up with.
The detective has something against Ivory and literally stalks around the manor to interrogate her, which would mean in this shot, he's watching her go about her day
The detective isn't actually in the manor. Instead, he's a figment of Ivory's imagination, a reflection of how badly the interrogation impacted her. That would explain why she's the only one who ever sees him at the estate and no one else does. When she mentions him to Serapter, Serapter hasn't seen him, and we don't have confirmation that Prince Zam sees him after going to find him in this episode.
This would mean that him standing atop of the stairs is a reflection of her mind, a sign that the memories of the interrogation are always ready to pounce on her in the form of the detective (which happens later in the episode).
---
A different theory which is pretty much unattached from this one
While I'm not all that familiar with the ARG videos and the backgrounds, I've watched those which have been found with a playlist someone else made.
In those videos, Epony (the mirror image or counterpart of Ivory) leads Ivory to a room in a bedrock box and traps her there. Then, Ivory tries to break out, but the whole room is surrounded by bedrock.
What is interesting to me about this part of the ARG especially, is the voice Ivory hears, because to my friend Bee and to me, this voice seems like Lop's. This would mean that this whole sequence of videos took place at the end of Whitepine 4, meaning we know at what time they happened.
---
It's possible these theories aren't actually what took place, but I thought sharing them might help the overall community 🤍
i. i was supposed to be a tr!owen hater because im a tr!ros stan. WHY AM I NOW GOING APESHIT OVER OWEN. HOLY SHIT THAT WAS SO GOOD?????? OWENGEJUICETV I THOUGHT I WAS FAMILIAR WITH YOUR GAME, I WAS NOT
Attention all Hogwarts Legacy MCs!
I am starting an MC Sleepover! Everyone is welcome!
Sharing and “nominating” others is definitely encouraged! I would like as many peeps at this sleep over as possible!💜💙
I look forward to seeing everyone’s MCs in there pjs! 🌙✨
taylor swift albums as summer moodboards
Imagine later, when Rosie is much, much older, she finally gets into astronomy of all topics. She learns about the solar system, the galaxy, everything she can get her hands on and eventually, Sherlock finds out.
He's confused, doesn't understand why she'd learn and store all this unnecessary information but then, she explains the solar system to him, with eyes glowing like the very sun itself, and a few days later Sherlock knows every planet of the solar system and every close star, not because he tried, not because he used his mind palace, but because it was important.
Rosie had told him, she had told him all about it, so of course it was important enough to remember because his daughter had told him that
Anyway if you see this you have to reblog and tag with a delight from ur day -- even the littlest thing counts
syndicate
Essentially, it's like... productivity website meets fantasy ambient and vibes
If you know Blue Turtle, that's the one who made it! Check it out if you like ambient videos I love it so much already
is that a bird is that a plane WRONG. BIG SUBSCRIBE BUTTON GO
^this is from technos enderchest.. number one sellout foreber i care him so much
I feel like there are so many people in writing spaces who seem to believe storytelling is metaphysical somehow instead of a very mundane and practicable skill and craft.
like that poll about whether a story needs meaning. I think it's so odd to be talking about whether a story "needs" meaning because it implies this image of writers pulling an already extant story from the sea and, like a lobsterman checking for eggs, deciding whether to throw it back to the waves based on whether or not it has "meaning."
the very simple reality of it is that stories are a form of communication. it is a use of language. whenever you are communicating something to someone using language, that person will be processing your words to understand your meaning. that is how language works.
if you're telling someone about your day, for example, you choose what events to include and exclude from your retelling. say you want to emphasize the bad parts of your day because you're feeling upset and you're talking about your day so someone will understand why you're upset. so you mention how your boss spoke to you and how you missed the bus and how you stained your one good shirt you wear to interviews when trying to find a better job. you might mention the person who offered you cover under their umbrella at the bus stop as a moment of compassion and relief contrasted with the rest of your day. but you probably leave out the details about scrolling through instagram on your lunch break or your conversation with a coworker about filling out a maintenance request because even though these were part of your day, neither are really important to the point you're making, and it would only obfuscate what you're trying to communicate. we communicate with storytelling all the time.
you can choose to just write and never interrogate why you're saying the things you're saying to other people. but I don't know why anyone would recommend it as a practice. especially in contexts in which you're tying your writing to your identity in any way, because then you're not remotely prepared for people's response to what you say to them. it's like getting blackout drunk or very high before giving a speech to a bunch of strangers. sure, it's theoretically possible that completely absent any inhibition or planning or self-aware intention or desire to communicate something you might say good things that you would be proud of later, but it's not likely. and even if it's possible, why would you want to surrender control over what random ideas and values and life experiences you share with all these people? terrifying! why gamble with that instead of being intentional?
the alternative is simply being intentional about what you actually want to say and what emotions you want your audience to be left with. intentional with what narratives you share and why it starts where it starts and ends where it ends. what images you want to repeat and why you want to connect the emotional scenes you connect. which characters you introduce and why their perspectives or actions are needed to convey what you're trying to convey. think about who and what is important to get what you're trying to say across.
all the intention and planning in the world is not going to necessarily ensure that people will understand what you are trying to communicate from reading your story. they might still interpret it completely different than how you meant it, bring their own meaning to it, assume things about you and your values from their own interpretation of it. that happens all the time, and it usually doesn't feel good, but that's art.
a lot of the craft of writing is learning how to best minimize that happening. how do you convey your meaning accurately to the most readers possible? how can you learn to evoke the emotions you're meaning to evoke from other writers who are successful at making you feel emotions they want you to feel? those things are at the core of what you are learning when you are honing your writing skills.
to refuse to engage with that at all is completely alien to me--what is the point if there is no point? why listen to someone tell you about their day if they don't even care why they're telling you what they're telling you?
all communication is imperfect--we can never understand exactly what someone else intended to convey. but good communication is trying our best to make the gap between what one person wants to communicate and what the other person interprets as small as possible. storytelling, and learning to do it well, is just another form this takes. it's language.
»Life is not a question, there does not need to be an answer.«💛🩷🤍🩶🖤✧ she/her
276 posts