OMG YOU ARE MONSTER FAN!now The Obligatory Question: What Is Your Interpretation Of The Last Scene?(Who

OMG YOU ARE MONSTER FAN!now the obligatory question: what is your interpretation of the last scene?(Who was unwanted)

What's the name of the work? Monster. What is the end? The end of Monster? The end of the monster, right?

Even though Johan lost his identity the moment he realized that his mother had sacrificed his sister. He doesn't realize that his mother would rather protect one than lose both.

If Bonaparte had realized that one of the little girls was a little boy, he would have wanted the little girl for the sake of his experiment. Their mother made her twins into a single being to protect them. She removed their names to make them exist, not disappear.

The proof is that she gave them a name.

Which proves that "Johan" the monster no longer needs to swallow to have a name. Then the monster is gone.

When Tenma has this hallucination of Johan, in reality it's the monster's last breath, an agony on a deathbed of the creature that had swallowed the little boy. But through this resentment, the boy behind the monster exists. The monster was nothing. Animosity, on the other hand, is something.

Through this resentment, the boy begins to exist. Then the hallucination fades, the monster is no longer present.

It’s a doctor's job to see that hospital bed empty again for all the right reasons. Tenma saved his patient.

This bed doesn't prove absence - it proves presence. Johan's trademark was to continually leave absolutely no trace of his existence. To the point where we wondered if anyone had actually occupied his student room.

This bed has all the evidence that someone was here. If Johan continued to exist, this bed would be made to perfection. As this bed is unmade, it proves that Johan has ceased to exist.

And that the man with a name exists.