Я думаю, было бы лучше, если бы мы игнорировали этих насильников, идентифицирующих себя с женщинами (at least for a while) Видеть их последнюю чушь в своей ленте просто утомительно.
Just a very friendly reminder that radical feminism would be incomplete without gender critical theory. There is no such thing as a “trans-inclusive radical feminist” and anyone who calls themselves that isn’t a radfem.
There are quite a few new “radical feminist” accounts popping up, claiming to be trans-inclusive with some having posts clearly being written with ChatGPT. I personally think this is an attempt to either influence our opinions and or invade our spaces. It would be best to not interact with these accounts. Don’t like, comment, reblog or report whatsoever. Even if you are going to call them out. Don’t give them an audience.
Men are constantly trying to divide us and make us quarrel. They try to talk nonsense about white privileged women. Or they try to make us think that women criminals are much more dangerous than men criminals. I read similar nonsense on Instagram the other day. Thanks for your "concern", but in a world without men we would all feel safer than in a world without dangerous women
"The Devil's greatest trick was making you believe that he doesn't exist."
Kind of like how men's greatest trick was making women believe that the patriarchy is an illusion and that their oppression is just a fantasy in the minds of a few crazy, shrieking harpies who call themselves "feminists."
They… literally contradict themselves…
Yes, gender ideology is the denial of female oppression. TRAs hate admitting this.
Not every abdominal pain is a period cramp.
All the women I follow are so sweet, fierce and awesome 🩷💞💕
males who identify as women really believe that gender roles is what makes someone a woman, so i guess im not a woman if i don’t shave my legs
I've never understood the argument: "You're going to alienate people if you continue to hold such a purist view." I saw that a lot in radfem circles before I left.
Alienate whom exactly? The people who don't care about the meaning of the label they're applying to themselves? The people who selfishly want to warp a whole movement or definition to include them, because they don't want to follow certain foundational aspects of it but still want to be included in the "club"?
It's so crazy how radfems would shun any other people narcissistically and falsely trying to include themselves in a group they don't belong to (4Bers who still date men, kinksters calling themselves asexuals, men calling themselves women) and yet they fall for this cry for "inclusivity"by women who are trying to water down their movement from within. It's such a joke!
You shouldn't be worried EVER about alienating people who are objectively not part of your group/movement; this is common sense. You should be gatekeeping the true meaning of it ruthlessly, or just give up and accept that it's going to be unrecognizable in a few short years.
It's really weird and uncomfortable speaking to someone and realizing that they watch pornography. There's always a few tells and it always makes me feel a bit grossed out.