For This To Be True, Heterosexuality As A Whole Would Have To Be Challenged. That Includes Non Heteros

For this to be true, heterosexuality as a whole would have to be challenged. That includes non heteros who seek to mimic such dynamics. We all know that won’t happen though. An actual feminist would protect children by demanding the porn watching father be removed from the house. Boy children wouldn’t be allowed preferential treatment. Mothers who bought their daughters razors and lipstick could be called out for grooming the next generation. Your desire to have babies with degenerate losers would no longer be enabled. We all know how that would go.

This is another call to extract resources from sovereign women. Who would only be further ostracized and ridiculed by the same women asking for help, if they actually delivered proper treatment. Women insist on cohabiting and procreating with the same half of the population they become paranoid about leaving their children with. Most women will eventually settle with a man and become pregnant. Meaning most men will be chosen by women. Yet, they’d never ask men as a collective to care for kids.

How does that work exactly? Most men have women willing to vouch for them and co-sign their social “safeness” by partnering up, but they’re still not fully trusted. If men are worthy of sleeping with and birthing, there should be no reason to fear their presence so much. These women would never call on men to protect every child they see, as most can barely be present for their own. Women reduce themselves to being incubators for predators, and want those who are free to be even lower than themselves. You’re the predator and groomers babysitter.

Question a mother on anything and watch her reaction. Try and instill actual feminist principles into children, especially daughters, and prepare to be torn a new one. More women will accuse you of malicious intent for letting their daughters know the truth about marriage and procreation, than they would for their beloved husband with “young” in his search history. If protecting children was considered important, majority of the population wouldn’t be here today.

Cat calling typically begins to happen for girls at age 10. 18 and under is when most abuse and assault takes place. Gendered grooming starts when the sonographer accurately reports a baby’s sex, with most women hoping for a son. Boy children are revered, and adult men are worshipped. If women continue to insist on bringing more children here, they shouldn’t require backup, as there’s no higher endorsement of our world than furthering it.

This is a losing game. Women know men are going to continue preying on children, even the ones they help make. Instead of swallowing their cognitive dissonance, they’ll blame unburdened women for continually failing. In the same way non lesbians employ homophobia the moment their lapdogs won’t defend, or excuse their dealings with men. CPS already exists, and is looked down upon. If child well fare were to be societally acted upon, no more than %2 of the population could parent.

You will do more to protect kids by never birthing them into our Earths low vibrational circumstances, and leading by example through freedom. A million man lovers could pitch into communal nurturing, making the world an even less safe place. While one highly functioning woman with the capacity to reason, discern her environment, and put logic over idealistic thoughts, would make more of a difference. Even if only once. You co create reality with your actions. Helping husband and wife only furthers their misery making. Keep children safe by refusing to succumb to societal guilt tripping by the child endangering masses,