This Man Has 2 Death Flags In Less Than A Year Someone Help Him

At this point, I feel like Vision died more often tha Loki

Loki

Thor 1- Dead but not really

Thor dark world- Dead but not really

Infinity War- Really dead this time but there's a spare

Vision

AoU- Jarvis dies and Vision is born

Infinity war- Dies twice

Wandavision- The newly created Vision is erased from its existence

Loki (Kind of) dies 3 times and Vision dies 4

Man, marvel really likes to kill their British actors in the mcu

Fantastic beasts and Crimes of Grindelwald review

Ok this is a NO SPOILER review with my own opinions

+ Just because I love the character doesn't mean that I'm defending the actors with certain controversies. Actor=/=Character

Things I liked about the movie

- Newt and Leta's back to school storyline. I LOVED IT. The young actors who portrayed those characters were incredibly symmetrical to original actors and how a boy from Hufflepuff and girl from Slytherin hang out melted my heart

- Everyone's sense of fashion

- JONNY DEPP'S GRINDELWALD Oh my god guys. Whether you like him or not, it's just... he just nailed the entire performance. Honestly, I didn't like how they styled his hair and looks, but once you watch the movie, they don't matter anymore. It's just the dark wizard himself inspiring and grasping everyone's attention. Once you step out from the cinema, the only character I thought about was him.

- Grindelwald actually proposes a very reasonable and convincing agenda which scared me. He reminded me of Michael Fassbender's Magneto in X Men. Compared to Voldemort, who proposes an extreme dictatorship, G sounded like he was actually fighting for the rights for the wizards.

- MY BABY NIFFLER

- Lkie the first one, it was nice to see the adult's wizarding world where they are not students, but and actual member of the wizarding society with strong and built up abilities

Thing I didn't like

- The storyline was extremely weak tbh. The first act with Newt and his animals was interesting & exciting, but the second act was dragging the storyline. The story only built up with conflict and more conflict without a proper climax in the movie

- Leta's storyline was full of plot holes and mostly dragging the movie. There is a scene which includes her talking for the entire scene which I felt it was kind of unnecessary and makes you roll your eyes and go 'uhh, can we move on to next part now??' I liked Zoe's acting, but it's just David Yate's poor storytelling skills

- There were a lot of UNNECESSARY SUPPORTING CHARACTERS. Like seriously, the movie could have been 100% fine without them

- The title 'Fantastic beasts' sounds like an mere excuse to explain Dumbledore and Grindelwald's storyline. Both of it could have been a separate movie, where there is a spin off about Newt acting like a Pokemon trainer, searching and analysing magical creatures, but the main movie is about the actual Dumbledore vs Grindelwald storyline. Why combine those two??

It wasn't a movie you'd enjoy 100% in the cinema because it didn't really solve or developed a storyline, but it makes you wonder and get excited for the sequel. 6.7/10 for me

Antman and the Wasp Review!

NON- SPOILER REVIEW SO YOU ARE SAFE TO READ IF YOU HAVEN'T WATCHED IT YET

I know I haven't done reviews for a while but here I go

- Antman, Scott Lang is hilarious like always, but I also liked the relationship between her daughter, family, the Pym & Van Dyne family, basically everyone. Cassie is so lovely

- Janet Van Dyne as Wasp was spectacular, her action scenes were great, and basically the main storyline of the movie revolved around her

- I really love those particular shrinking and enlarging action scenes with humor where can only seen by an Antman & Wasp movie. THE PYM TECH, I love it

- Scott and Hope had great chemistry together. And so did Hank and Janet, with that short amount of screen time together

- God Louis you precious man. Oh and also, the cop, he was awesome too

- Michelle Pfeiffer and Micheal Douglas in one shot just made me smile, where two silver haired senior actors are just happy together

- HORRIBLE villain

- It was like, as if Marvel created their uninteresting unattractive villain back in phase 1. Both Ghost and Sonny were just terrible

- There was one scene where Ghost basically explains her back story on why she became a villain about full five minutes just making the heroes sit there and she just says what ever she wants. And I was like ' Oh... Really....? Oh ok.... pity you..... but, are you done...? You're not? Ok....'. Basically she reminded me of Malekith back in Thor the Dark World

- You know when the heroes are more attractive than the villain, you want the good guys to win. When villain is more attractive, you want the villain to take over, and if both are charming, you are just sold? Well in this movie, Yeah heroes are damn great but every time when the villain appeared, I was just... irritated? Annoyed? Oh and yes, this includes Sonny too. But at least he had some more character in him

- OHHH!! the end credits!!!!! Don't you dare miss that. It makes you go HUUHHHH?????

Overall, great CGI, great graphics, main story line about the Pym family, awesome heores, meh villain. For me, it was 7.7/10. What a amazing introduction to debut the Wasp. She was amazing

Civil War

I was on Team Cap when I read the Civil War comics but I’m slightly confused right now..

I was against the superhuman registration act and Cap was fighting for his moral values which made me to be on his side (but honestly, Ironman also had some point on SRA. You guys also know you’ll support the act if superheroes were in real life and use their powers without ANY supervision. That would be a disaster)

However, in this movie Civil War, Captain made every heroes to fight against each other, who were very close friends in order to protect his friend Bucky, who may not be a villian but definately IS A CRIMINAL (just because he was brain washed while doing so doesn’t mean he is clean) and needs to go to prison or see justice some other way. If Captain had his moral values straight, he would have found some other way to protect his friend in court instead of causing a WAR

Of course, there will be some political issues involved but I’m worried that the Civil War movie may go too personal on Cap's instead of fighting for superhuman's rights. I'm still on Team Cap but there may be changes

The thing is, Thor isn't a person who would abandon his responsibilities as a king or his people after Thor 3. Possibly in Thor 2, sure. He actually mentions that he doesn't want to be a king. But after Thor 3 and Infinity war he's grown, he saw Loki & Heimdall sacrifice themselves so Thor could live. But in all those incidents he wouldn't let him self go just like that. He just wouldn't. Remember when he lost his hammer, father, hair(lol), finds out he had a sister who's really evil and he got casted out as a slave in trash planet? Did he let him self go? NO. Because Thor is someone who continues to walk forward no matter the failures and mistakes he had made. He destroyed his own planet to save the Asgardians and still had hope to carry on. Then in Endgame where Valkyrie, Korg, and the survivors of Asgard returned, he just chucked away his responsibilities and whines about his the one who killed Thanos and blah blah. He's trapped in self misery which is out of the past 10 years of characterisation. He actually doesn't have the reason to give up! Not to mention How Russos used Thor's PTSD as a comic device and fat shamed him the entire movie for the sake of humor

For Bruce Banner, in Infinity War the Russos didn't give any chance for Hulk to actually fight until the end after he got beaten in the first act. I thought there would be an important reason for that which would be explained in Endgame. BUT NOPE. The struggle of Bruce identifying his alter ego is just one and they mixed the two together. We didn't even got to see how the hell did that happen. Russos were like 'here, this is canon accept it even if we showed & explained nothing for you' in our throat. Also, Bruce banner is one of the smartest scientist in the mcu yet he struggles so much on the Quantum realm sutff and in the end, its always Tony Stark who saves the day with Bruce banner not being able to solve anything. I really prefered Whedon's Bruce Banner & Hulk more than Russos'.

For Natasha, I found it really creepy on how Russo brothers kept sacrificing the only female member of the team (Gamora in original GotG, Natasha in original Avengers) for the sake of 'sacrifice the LOVED ones for the sake of greater good' in Vormir. Also it just doesn't make any sense. If they wanted the soul stone then didn't Nebula forewarn them that there should be a LOVING sacrifice? Again, plot hole. Natasha's sacrifice was unnecessary and was just full of plot holes. But then I thought, fine. I guess they're starting to kill off all the original 6 avengers one by one starting with Black widow. But nope, just her and Tony, who got the most screen time and emotional scene with most dramatic exit ever happened in MCU, but not Nat. Didn't you find it odd to see when Steve said Avengers assemble and there was no Black widow? Or the scene where all the female heroes stand and there is no first female superhero in the MCU? Didn't you think that Black widow's death was totally unnecessary and was just wasted as mere plot device? Or she didn't get that grand funeral that Tony got or just NO FUNERAL AT ALL. I mean you can say that 'Oh I'm pretty sure that Nat had her tombstone too and everyone's mourning for her as well!' But did we see that in the movie? NO. It's just Clint and Wanda mentioning her for 3 sec then boom. End of the movie

I agree Joss Whedon was horrible in AoU with her character but I really liked Nat in Avengers 1. And in terms of female characters, at least Whedon didn't make Wanda to wear Corset through out the movie. The suit at the end of AoU had no corset which Russos just ignored... Also he actually cared for Bruce Banner & Hulk which Russos just used him as comical device in IW and Endgame. And Thor... god I just want to cry on how they concluded the story line like this. Tony and Steve had glorified ending but Thor who's the big three of the MCU was just unacceptable

Gosh Avengers Endgame was so bad now I’m starting to want Joss Whedon back

At least Whedon wouldn’t ruin Thor & Banner’s character just like that or he’ll kill off female character so pointlessly… Seriously, there’s so many plot holes in this time travel shit that Russos failed to explain. Are they even the same directors who directed Infinity war???? What the fuck happened?? I think marvel will never be able to surpass Whedon’s Avengers 1. And yes, I am this desperate. It’s like Sherlock season three all over again. Directors starring themselves& their family members in the movie, taking up time and not enough for the actual characters. I didn’t pay to see your face or your children

I just watched Hunger games

Great movie representing the conflict between the rulling class and the subject class and how there are no winners in war, but there are only survivors And I didn't know Foggy was in Hunger games!?

No seriously, Wenwu needs a what if...? episode on what would have happened if his wife didn't die and he wasn't a horrible father to Shang Chi and Xia Ling. If that purple thumb can have it, Toney Leung deserves much more

It's really refreshing to see this blog. I hate choosing to support marvel or DC. Love~

Thank you!! It’s quite depressing to see how one fandom hates the another while I just love all the comic book superheroes/villains in general. They all have their own charms

(Softly) Don't do it Disney

GUYS WHAT IF BUCKY RIPPED OUT RHODEY'S ARC REACTOR AND NOW HE'S TRYING TO RIP TONY'S?!? WTF BUCKY?! WAKE UP!!