The Great Nebula in Carina : In one of the brightest parts of Milky Way lies a nebula where some of the oddest things occur. NGC 3372, known as the Great Nebula in Carina, is home to massive stars and changing nebulas. The Keyhole Nebula , the bright structure just above the image center, houses several of these massive stars and has itself changed its appearance. The entire Carina Nebula spans over 300 light years and lies about 7,500 light-years away in the constellation of Carina. Eta Carinae, the most energetic star in the nebula, was one of the brightest stars in the sky in the 1830s, but then faded dramatically. Eta Carinae is the brightest star near the image center, just left of the Keyhole Nebula. While Eta Carinae itself maybe on the verge of a supernova explosion, X-ray images indicate that much of the Great Carina Nebula has been a veritable supernova factory. via NASA
js
HIV virus particle, budding influenza virus and HIV in blood serum as illustrated by David S. Goodsell.
Goodsell is a professor at the Scripps Research Institute and is widely known for his scientific illustrations of life at a molecular scale. The illustrations are usually based on electron microscopy images and available protein structure data, which makes them more or less accurate. Each month a new illustrated protein structure can be found in Protein Data Bank molecule of the month section and you can read more on how his art is made here.
Outi on the couch - Sievänen, Jaakko 1974
Finnish,1932-2013
oil and tempera on canvas , 135,5 x 160,5 cm.
Nearly every day Cassini sends back something amazing to sit and wonder at.
1) Saturn’s rings, 15 July 2014
2) Tethys / Saturn’s rings 14 July 2014
3) Disk of Saturn 14 July 2014
4) Prometheus / F Ring 13 July 2014
5) Pan in the Encke Gap 13 July 2014
All raw and unprocessed images from saturn.jpl.nasa.gov
“The topic I’d like to suggest is high-energy relics, like domain walls, cosmic strings, monopoles, etc… it would be great to read more about what these defects really are, what their origin is, what properties they likely have, or, and this is probably the most exciting part for me, how we expect them to look like and interact with the ‘ordinary’ universe.”
So, you’d like to ruin the fabric of your space, would you? Similar to tying a knot in it, stitching it up with some poorly-run shenanigans, running a two-dimensional membrane through it (like a hole in a sponge), etc., it’s possible to put a topological defect in the fabric of space itself. This isn’t just a mathematical possibility, but a physical one: if you break a symmetry in just the right way, monopoles, strings, domain walls, or textures could be produced on a cosmic scale. These could show up in a variety of ways, from abundant new, massive particles to a network of large-scale structure defects in space to a particular set of fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background. Yet when it comes time to put up or shut up, the Universe offers no positive evidence of any of these defects. Save for one, that is: back in 1982, there was an observation of one (and only one) event consistent with a magnetic monopole. 35 years later, we still don’t know what it was.
It’s time to investigate the possibilities, no matter how outlandish they seem, on this week’s Ask Ethan!
NASA’s first satellite, launched in 1958, discovered two giant swaths of radiation encircling Earth. Five decades later, scientists are still trying to unlock the mysteries of these phenomena known as the Van Allen belt. The belt is named after its discoverer, American astrophysicist James Van Allen.
The near-Earth space environment is a complex interaction between the planet’s magnetic field, cool plasma moving up from Earth’s ionosphere, and hotter plasma coming in from the solar wind. This dynamic region is populated by charged particles (electrons and ions) which occupy regions known as the plasmasphere and the Van Allen radiation belt. As solar wind and cosmic rays carry fast-moving, highly energized particles past Earth, some of these particles become trapped by the planet’s magnetic field. These particles carry a lot of energy, and it is important to mention their energies when describing the belt, because there are actually two distinct belts; one with energetic electrons forming the outer belt, and a combination of protons and electrons creating the inner belt. The resulting belts, can swell or shrink in size in response to incoming particles from Earth’s upper atmosphere and changes in the solar wind. Recent studies suggest that there is boundary at the inner edge of the outer belt at roughly 7,200 miles in altitude that appears to block the ultrafast electrons from breaching the invisible shield that protects Earth.
Earth’s magnetic field doesn’t exactly line up with the planet’s rotation axis, the belts are actually tilted a bit. Because of this asymmetry, one of the shields that trap potentially harmful particles from space dips down to 200 km (124 mi) altitude.
This dip in the earth’s magnetic field allows charged particles and cosmic rays to reach lower into the atmosphere. Satellites and other low orbiting spacecraft passing through this region of space actually enter the Van Allen radiation belt and are bombarded by protons. Exposure to such radiation can wreak havoc on satellite electronics, and pose serious health risks to astronauts. This peculiar region is called the South Atlantic Anomaly.
Credit: NASA/ESA/M. Kornmesser
“4. Following your intuition will never get you as far as doing the math will. Coming up with a beautiful, powerful and compelling theory is the dream of many scientists worldwide, and has been for as long as there have been scientists. When Copernicus put forth his heliocentric model, it was attractive to many, but his circular orbits couldn’t explain the observations of the planets as well as Ptolemy’s epicycles – ugly as they were – did. Some 50 years later, Johannes Kepler built upon Copernicus’ idea and put forth his Mysterium Cosmographicum: a series of nested spheres whose ratios could explain the orbits of the planets. Except, the data didn’t fit right. When he did the math, the numbers didn’t add up.”
There are a lot of myths we have in our society about how the greatest of all scientific advances happened. We think about a lone genius, working outside the constraints of mainstream academia or mainstream thinking, working on something no one else works on. That hasn’t ever really been true, and yet there are actual lessons – valuable ones – to be learned from observing scientists throughout history. The greatest breakthroughs can only happen in the context of what’s already been discovered, and in that sense, our scientific knowledge base and our best new theories are a reflection of the very human endeavor of science. When Newton claimed he was standing on the shoulders of giants, it may have been his most brilliant realization of all, and it’s never been more true today.
Come learn these five vital lessons for yourself, and see if you can’t find some way to have them apply to your life!
sich wie die Axt im Wald benehmen
to behave like the axe in the forest
to behave like a bull in the china shop
(via thatswhywelovegermany)