I Love Science

For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear. For the bear.

Iterators but theyre a massive fackin war llama from the hit game Ultrakill

Tumblr

Voynich Manuscript SparkNotes

Trust me I'm getting tired of this too but... This is Micah Mayfield, a guntuber who recently released a video in which he made a "joke" ab

Maybe not all of his friends but a good chunk definitely. Also We*digoon is friends with Turkey Tom, that should be enough for anyone to disavow him.

I understand that IPOS' video isn't the best when it comes to being accurate but that doesn't change the fact that We*digoon is comfortable being friends with nazis, transphobes, and racists.

Unless We*digoon makes a video shitting on all of his bigot friends, then he's a bigot in my eyes. Doesn't matter if he's "nice" while sitting back as his friends openly desire killing queer people.

Best-case scenario: He is standing back as his friends joke about killing trans people.

Worst-case scenario: He's a slimy fuck who supports their ideals but hides it under his YT persona.

Would a porn ban in AO3 affect other countries too? Or will AO3 just block explicit works in the USA but let the rest of the world see them?

hey everyone! back up your works on ao3, because project 2025 is probably going into effect. porn will be illegal.

BACK IT UP OFFLINE. the cloud will not save you here.

also, make sure you're current on your vaccines. and that all your ID and documents are up to date. Renew that passport.

because the fda, cdc, and state department are about to go to hell, too.

how are we even in this position again? insanity. pure insanity. but protect yourself, and be ready to protect your vulnerable loved ones. shit is about to get real bad.

Poorly drawn Eevee line

Is someone gonna take one for the team and leak Scott Cawthons political donations again

Reminder that scott cawthon donates money to anti-lgbt republicans

I hate how they made Stella so dumb to the point that I question how she survived in Hell for so long because of how intellectually, politically, powerfully, and emotionally inadequate she is. I'm surprised she hasn't been assassinated, or been killed off by an enraged noble, or gotten killed by one of the carnivorous plants.

It is impossible that she has survived this long IN HELL! In Hell POLITICS especially! Shit is probably GoT on steroids and more magic.

Now when people say that, "It's Hell of course she's horrible," I just laugh because they're right, she is horrible. Horrible at being A NOBLE in HELL!

Someone who survived so long being betrothed and married to one of the most important members of Hell politics and no one tried to vie for her position? No one has ever challenged her to actually think?

here comes Stella!! I know she is bad but i still love her for some reason

hoot hoot💅

I'm showing up to this topic three years late, but the overrall fandom response to Scott's response about his political donations is really strange to me in hindsight.

I guess I'm not super surprised that people took his words of not being racist or queerphobic at face-value, but I am disappointed.

At best, we don't know the guy, and being able to evaluate whether he definitively is or is not bigoted is just something that's hard to do with the limited information we have, especially since we don't know how genuine his online persona is. He doesn't elaborate very much on his political views in his reddit post [link] other than specifically saying he's a Christian republican and pro-life.

But even beyond that, most white, allocishet, able-bodied, and otherwise privileged people will deny any accusations of bigotry without reflecting on themselves first, because acknowledging the bigoted things we are taught and complacent in immediately feels like an attack. It takes conscious work to actually respond in a constructive, repairative way to that, and Scott's post feels really dismissive, especially in that he outright refuses to apologize for supporting the candidates in question. The whole post had a "I'm sorry you feel that way" overtone, which is not a proper apology let alone a solution. I feel that someone genuinely invested in disproving those accusations, i.e. not because it hurts their ego, but because it hurts others, would put more care into their response.

Not to mention, even if Scott genuinely isn't queerphobic, and especially if he isn't racist, it's not enough to not be those things. You have to actively unlearn and fight against them. I will give Scott that he has supported organizing against queerphobia with donations to the Trevor Project, but I'm not sure if he has supported any antiracist organizations or movements.

He states he supported a politician thinking they could help "bring the Black community out of poverty," but doesn't elaborate further. From what I understand, that's not necessarily an acknowledgment of systemic racism, as many racists will acknowledge that Black people struggle, but then deny that it's the fault of systemic oppression.

Regardless, neither of these erase his donations to queerphobic and racist politicians. And his admitted pro-life stance is most definitely informed by some amount of misogyny, which is rampant in American Christian spaces.

That's really a lot of words to say that as much as Scott defined our childhood and seems like a nice guy, we shouldn't take his statements at face value at all. We have little information, and what we do have doesn't seem to paint a pretty picture.

It's been three years and I can only hope his opinions and donation patterns have changed, but without any solid evidence, I don't feel comfortable giving him money or benefit of the doubt.