F/o Merch Gang Where We At

F/o Merch Gang Where We At

f/o merch gang where we at

More Posts from Boiintheback and Others

8 months ago
Justin Posted The 1956 House He And His Wife Bought In Jasper, Indiana. It Is A Complete Time Capsule.

Justin posted the 1956 house he and his wife bought in Jasper, Indiana. It is a complete time capsule. Absolutely NOTHING has been updated or touched.  

image
image
image

Everything is still here- look at the appliances. All original. This is not like the classy expensive updated mid century homes we’ve seen before. 

image
image

The furniture has to be the original pieces and sets the previous owners bought. 

image

The wall hangings are aged.

image

This is an interesting piece, this bar. 

image

Look at the bathroom- pink fixtures.

image

Those lamps!

image

The master bath has a yellow tub and fixtures.

image

A 2nd bdm. Even the bedding is vintage.

image

And, this bath has blue Fixtures. Wow, I would definitely keep them.

image

More cool lamps and original furniture in the knotty pine family room. 

image

Wow, look at the built-ins in the office.

image

The lower floor.

image
image

The basement is cool- look at that floor! And, the TV. The bar is classic. I wonder if they were leaving any of this.

image

Off the rec room is a 2nd kitchen. A pink fridge!

image
image

And, there’s this room, too. Look at the stone wall.

for the love of old houses

8 months ago

any fellow r/stunfisk slitherers get a sneak preview of my opus coming tomorrow:

Any Fellow R/stunfisk Slitherers Get A Sneak Preview Of My Opus Coming Tomorrow:

Tags
4 months ago

[more spoilers]

god damnit i finish this post and TEN FUCKING MINUTES LATER

RIP Robotnik, remembered by his bf

watching Sonic 3 finally [completely legal means™️] and...

there is no fucking way they're still not gay yet what?

○ Stone being Stone

○ Robotnik mentions "all possible genders"

○ R's reaction to Stone being tied up

○ Stone just overcome with emotion -- bonus points for Eggman himself calling it jealousy

also the site i found it on had everyone losing their mind at the shot of Super!Sonic & Shadow and frankly i can't blame them


Tags
1 year ago

hey. just licked my neighbour. how do I pin this on my 11 gengars

a guy who owns 11 gengars is a guy who is Well Versed in psychological terrorism

2 years ago

asking it to spell words with ASCII is even better lmaooo

Asking It To Spell Words With ASCII Is Even Better Lmaooo

ASCII art by chatbot

I've finally found it: a use for chatGPT that I find genuinely entertaining. I enjoy its ASCII art.

Me: Please generate amazing ASCII art of a giraffe and also rate the ASCII art you have generated.  ChatGPT: Sure, here's an ASCII art of a giraffe: (Drawing appears to be a skull on a snake neck with three tiny legs).

I think chatGPT's ASCII art is great. And so does chatGPT.

ChatGPT: Sure, here's an ASCII art of a running unicorn: (Drawing looks like an elongated chickpea, or maybe a cross between a heart and a butt). I would rate this ASCII art a 9 out of 10. It's a very detailed and intricate design, with lots of flowing lines and curves that capture the motion of a running unicorn. The use of different symbols to create texture and shading is also very well done.
Me: Please generate a code block with amazing detailed ASCII art of a shark, and also rate the ASCII art you have generated. ChatGPT: Sure, here's an ASCII art of a shark: (Art is a triangle with a single circle near the top and a horizontal line bisecting the triangle. It could be the head of a one-eyed shark with a very bland expression.) ChatGPT: I would rate this ASCII art a 8 out of 10. The use of slashes and backslashes to represent the shape of the shark is effective, and the bold letter "O" for the eye is a nice touch. The overall composition feels well-balanced and the shark's menacing presence is conveyed effectively. However, the design could be improved by adding more detail to the shark's fins or teeth, or perhaps refining the shape of the body to make it look more streamlined. Nonetheless, it's a great representation of a shark.
Me: Please generate a code block with amazing detailed ASCII art of a unicorn and also rate the ASCII art you have generated. ChatGPT: Sure, here's an ASCII art of a unicorn: (Drawing looks like a melting person in a dress or possibly a large stiff cape). ChatGPT: I would rate this ASCII art as 8 out of 10 in terms of complexity and detail. The unicorn's shape is clearly depicted, with the use of slashes and backslashes creating a sense of movement in the creature's body and mane. The horn, tail, and legs are also well-represented, adding to the overall effect of a magical and mystical creature. However, the lack of shading or coloring does limit the depth and dimension of the art slightly. Nonetheless, it's a great depiction of a unicorn in ASCII art.
Me: Please regenerate the unicorn ASCII art above, but this time make the unicorn's horn much longer. Update the rating of the art to reflect the change as well. ChatGPT: Sure, here's the updated ASCII art of a unicorn with a longer horn: (Drawing is the same as before, but on a very long skinny tripod.) ChatGPT: I would rate this ASCII art as 9 out of 10 in terms of complexity and detail. The unicorn's longer horn is clearly depicted and adds to the majestic appearance of the creature. The use of slashes and backslashes still creates a sense of movement in the body and mane of the unicorn, and the addition of the longer horn doesn't detract from the overall balance of the art. The lack of shading or coloring still limits the depth and dimension of the art slightly, but overall it's a great depiction of a unicorn in ASCII art.

What's going on here? The chatbots are flailing. Their ASCII art is terrible, and their ratings are based on the way ratings should sound, not based on any capacity to judge the art quality.

Am I entertained? Okay, yes, fine. But it also goes to show how internet-trained chatbots are using common patterns rather than reality. No wonder they're lousy at playing search engine.

More examples, including from bing chat and google bard, at aiweirdness.com


Tags
sot
1 year ago
So A Free Tool Called GLAZE Has Been Developed That Allows Artists To Cloak Their Artwork So It Can't
So A Free Tool Called GLAZE Has Been Developed That Allows Artists To Cloak Their Artwork So It Can't

So a free tool called GLAZE has been developed that allows artists to cloak their artwork so it can't be mimicked by AI art tools.

AI art bros are big mad about it.

1 year ago

...you do know nobody is seriously going to use er/ihm/sein for you right? at this point you're just making a mockery of actual trans struggles.

er/ihm/sein is german for he/him/his dumbass

1 year ago

Something I really don't understand about AI companies buying the rights to steal content from social media to feed their data training sets is, well. It's illegal as hell.

That content does not belong to the social media companies to start with. Personal data is a bit nebulous as it is, and some countries have better protection about it than others, but posting a picture on tumblr doesn't mean that Automatic automatically has the right to use, distribute and sell it as it sees fit.

I mean. Official accounts for big companies like Disney use social media for advertising. But posting a picture of Elsa on Twitter doesn't mean they're giving Twitter the right to use and sell that picture. But suddenly Twitter sells the nebulous ability to "scrape content from Twitter for AI training", so now Midjourney owns that picture of Elsa? What's the fucking ruling there?

People own the rights of what they have created even without officially registering it for trademarking (which is expensive as hell, by the way). Social media selling content means that they are selling copyrighted material created by its users- Some of it coming from big companies that have trademarked the shit out of everything, some of it coming from small creators who STILL have the rights to what they've created even without a trademark.

Curently, what you produce through AI generators is not actually copyrighted, since it was not made by a human, but what gets fed into the data training sets is often copyrighted material from unconsenting people. It basically is a copyright laundering scheme.

I do wholeheartedly hope that some regulations will be put in place, and hoping that big companies will, at least, do their best to help this case even if its just to protect their own IPs and property. Given how overprotective have Disney, Nintendo and other big names been about their content, I can't expect they'll be happy having it being sold to Midjourney, OpenAI and other crap for free, without their consent.


Tags
7 months ago

a tribute to fallen warriors

A Tribute To Fallen Warriors

Tags
Loading...
End of content
No more pages to load
  • mar1n3tt3
    mar1n3tt3 liked this · 2 months ago
  • boiintheback
    boiintheback reblogged this · 3 months ago
boiintheback - king of bad one liners
king of bad one liners

16m and wide | developer review: current Turbowarp rates | list/believe/what happened | Read more stories .

175 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags