I Posted 952 Times In 2021

Concept: a low-level Dungeons & Dragons adventure that’s initially presented as a standard “retrieve valuable treasure from bottom of dungeon at behest of wealthy patron” scenario.

As they enter the dungeon, the first thing the player characters encounter is a trap, clearly already triggered, with the long-dead bones of a previous adventurer caught inside. They can loot the corpse or not, as they prefer; it’s not a trick, and the trap is no longer dangerous.

As they delve deeper into the dungeon, they encounter further already-triggered traps, in a wide variety of increasingly imaginative forms, some with dead adventurers in them, some with dead monsters. What they do not, however, encounter are any living monsters or untriggered traps.

Finally, they reach the bottom of the dungeon, where they find the treasure: the Under-King’s personal living quarters, full of magically preserved Fifth Dynasty furniture, priceless to the right sort of collector, and untouched by looters due to the aforementioned traps. Bringing it out of the dungeon intact will be a slow and awkward proposition, of course, but the path is conveniently clear.

… that is, until the party ventures beyond the chamber’s threshhold, and the air is immediately filled with the telltale creaks and clicks of all the traps they just walked past automatically resetting.

As an autistic person, all of the above

not-so-friendly reminder to unfollow me if:

u think autism is a disease or illness

u think autism needs to be “cured”

u support Autism Speaks or organizations like it

u “feel bad” for ppl with autism and their families

u think autistic children are a burden to their parents/guardians 

u don’t believe in getting children vaccinated because vaccines “cause autism”

my friend just started watching atla (fucking finally) and he was like “how the fuck is this show apparently appropriate for seven year olds it’s about genocide???!!!?!!?!?!” and like..... the thing is, it’s animated and they don’t swear. there are no explicit depictions of blood or sexual violence. those are the standards by which [american] censors deem something to be a kids’ show. of course, what is and isn’t “appropriate for kids” is extremely arbitrary, because every kid is different, and will react differently to content, but if we are to rate certain media for certain demographics, we need specific guidelines.

we also discussed the fact that the matter of genocide is something that will either go over a young viewer’s head entirely, since they have yet to truly grasp the enormity of that grief & trauma, or, by the time they have reached the age of seven, they are so familiar with genocide and its effects that they would not consider a tv show that centers genocides in its narrative to be out of the ordinary.

(not always, of course, but) typically, you either grow up knowing that you come from genocide survivors (as well as many who did not survive) and that is second nature to you, something you carry with you in your guts and bones and heart, or, by the time you are seven (still a young child), the concept of such brutal atrocities has not yet entered your worldview, and thus you do not grasp what has actually happened to aang, katara, etc. you recognize that aang is “the last,” but you don’t actually understand what that means.

similarly, some children will see depictions of imperialist/colonial violence and immediately understand and relate, because again, it is something they grew up carrying with them; whereas others will simply understand the fire nation to be “the bad guys,” without fully understanding the human effects of their violence.

atla depicts imperialism, colonialism, genocide, poverty, labor camps, ptsd, abuse, etc. but unlike utena (which i just watched, so it’s on my mind) it does not depict sibling incest, it does not depict sexual violence period. sure, atla contains commentary on patriarchal violence, but not in the same way utena does. it’s that britta meme: “I can excuse colonial violence and paternal abuse, but I draw the line at incest!”

and I mean yeah. that makes sense. I read lolita at a very young age (upon my mother’s insistence that it’s time I learn how the world works), but I recognize that sexual violence is considered far more taboo than state/imperial violence, which is, frankly, considered commonplace (especially during bush-era america).

and then there’s a show like adventure time, which does depict taboos such as sexual violence, but is able to get past censors due to the more abstract nature of its storytelling, making it “kid friendly” by virtue of the fact that kids simply wouldn’t pick up on the less “appropriate” elements of the story.

I’m not sure I really have a singular point to make here. I just think the question “how is this [piece of media] apparently ‘for kids’?” can lead to interesting conversations about what forms of violence we deem age-appropriate in our society, why, as well as the ways in which various stories are told, and how audiences react to them. so these are just some scattered thoughts on the matter, based on some conversations I’ve had with friends recently. I think it’s a valuable question to ask, as long as you try to approach the subject from a place of understanding. shrug.

Akjlsjlsphh

if I wrote a dystopian novel where the corrupt evil megacorporation that controls society has a fucking smirk for a logo, my editor would tell me to use a less heavy-handed metaphor

I mean. I'm just saying. There are already ghost-type pokémon that eat human souls, so really I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out some Pokemon ate the flesh too. Also, humans totally eat pokemon, and pokémon totally eat each other. Check out this curry that looks suspiciously like Kingler:

are pokemon carnivorous?

This joke came to me in a fit of laughter (ALT description provided :3!)

“Humans are complex creatures with a variety of needs. They are not a suitable pet for most dragons, but for the right dragons who have time, patience, and proper resources, these animals can make absolutely incredible pets.”

Spring in Japan | Kazuhiro Yashima

The prince of the far, far away land wanted to marry the princess, but she rejected him. As a punishment the princess was sent to a lair of a dragon so that it would kill her. But as soon as the dragon and the princess saw each other they fell madly in love and lived happily ever after. The end!